22.01.2015 Views

Planning Applications - Runnymede Borough Council

Planning Applications - Runnymede Borough Council

Planning Applications - Runnymede Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.8 The ES has since been supplemented by an ‘Alternative Sites Study’<br />

(received by this <strong>Council</strong> in May 2003) which seeks to assess the<br />

acceptability of other potential sites within the south east of England.<br />

5. Consultations<br />

5.1 Elmbridge <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is the <strong>Planning</strong> Authority for this application and<br />

responsible for undertaking the required consultations.<br />

5.2 The application has been subject to public advertisement by the applicants<br />

under the Environmental Assessment Regulations and by Elmbridge<br />

<strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

6. <strong>Planning</strong> Considerations<br />

6.1 The main considerations so far as this <strong>Borough</strong> is concerned in respect of<br />

this application are those of Green Belt policy, the likely impact of traffic<br />

generation, and any flooding implications. The County <strong>Council</strong> will be<br />

looking at the strategic planning issues including the possible contribution<br />

of the development to the spatial strategy of the emerging Structure Plan in<br />

relation to economic growth. Other considerations including conservation,<br />

flooding, landscaping and design are essentially matters for Elmbridge<br />

<strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Green Belt Issues<br />

6.2 The Inspector who reported on the 1990 appeal considered that there was<br />

“no doubt” that the Central Area of Brooklands “serves to divide not only the<br />

two towns [Byfleet and Weybridge] but the east and west areas [of<br />

Brooklands]” and that “it serves a clear Green Belt function in terms of the<br />

advice in PPG2”. PPG2 (Green Belts) provides for a presumption against<br />

inappropriate development within the Green Belt which includes the<br />

construction of new buildings unless for specified purposes. The major built<br />

development now proposed would consist of a Heritage and Technology<br />

Centre for Mercedes coupled with the construction of a driving experience<br />

circuit, the creation of an additional access to Brooklands Museum, a<br />

replacement car park and an hotel, all located to the northern end of the<br />

Central Area within the Green Belt. The development of Class B1 office<br />

premises would be on the remaining part of the allocated strategic<br />

employment land of the Brooklands Industrial Estate, again to the northern<br />

end close to the main railway embankment.<br />

6.3 The proposals for buildings within the Green Belt are inappropriate<br />

development and therefore, by definition, a form of encroachment and<br />

harmful. Very special circumstances are required for an exceptional case,<br />

sufficient to override the harm caused by inappropriateness and any other<br />

material harm.<br />

6.4 With regard to very special circumstances, the proposals place heavy<br />

emphasis on the heritage aspects of the scheme including the restoration of<br />

surviving features, re-instatement of others, and the connection with the<br />

Brooklands Museum. In addition the proposal includes the provision of a<br />

community recreational park and a public thoroughfare along Wellington

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!