Planning Applications - Runnymede Borough Council
Planning Applications - Runnymede Borough Council
Planning Applications - Runnymede Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Flooding Issues<br />
6.12 The site lies within the flood plain of the River Wey. The application is<br />
accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA). The FRA identifies<br />
various mitigation measures and these have been incorporated with the<br />
proposed scheme to compensate for the loss of flood capacity. The views<br />
of the Environment Agency are not known, however the concerns for<br />
<strong>Runnymede</strong> will be that such measures are sufficient to ensure the<br />
development will not increase the risk of flooding downstream within the<br />
<strong>Borough</strong>. Elmbridge <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong> should be requested to have full<br />
regard for this concern in their consideration of the application.<br />
Conclusion<br />
6.13 The Committee would undoubtedly wish to support an acceptable scheme<br />
which secured the long term future of the Central Area of Brooklands in a<br />
satisfactory manner in terms of both the Green Belt, the local highway<br />
network and matters of flooding. Clearly it will be for Elmbridge <strong>Borough</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong>, in the first instance, to assess whether or not this is an acceptable<br />
scheme given all the circumstances and material considerations. In coming<br />
to any such decision Elmbridge <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will among other matters,<br />
need to consider fully this <strong>Borough</strong>’s objections in respect of the Green Belt<br />
and highways-related issues and to ensure that the concerns regarding<br />
flooding are adequately addressed.<br />
Officers’ Recommendation<br />
OBJECT for the following reasons:<br />
1. The proposal conflicts with the policy for the preservation of the<br />
Metropolitan Green Belt, as defined and described in Policies PE1<br />
and PE2 of the Surrey Structure Plan 1994, Policy LO4 of the Surrey<br />
Structure Plan Deposit Draft December 2002 and Policy GB2 of the<br />
Elmbridge <strong>Borough</strong> Local Plan August 2000, and it is not considered<br />
that sufficient reasons have been put forward in support of the<br />
application to amount to very special circumstances justifying the<br />
development.<br />
2. It has not yet been demonstrated that the proposals are compatible<br />
with the transport infrastructure in the area, in terms of the level of<br />
trip generation and the impact of the development traffic on the local<br />
highway network, contrary to the requirements in Policy MT2 of the<br />
Surrey Structure Plan Deposit Draft December 2002 and the advice<br />
in <strong>Planning</strong> Policy Guidance Note 13.<br />
Informatives:<br />
1. Elmbridge <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong> are requested to ensure that the<br />
development will not give rise to any increased risk of flooding from<br />
the River Wey downstream of the site, but which lies within the<br />
<strong>Borough</strong> of <strong>Runnymede</strong>.