(Vocational) and - Umalusi
(Vocational) and - Umalusi
(Vocational) and - Umalusi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CRITERIA AND<br />
FINDINGS<br />
subjects. The markers<br />
worked together as<br />
teams, discussing<br />
problems as they<br />
arose.<br />
There was a high level<br />
of consistency in<br />
marking, as evidenced<br />
in the verification of<br />
marking control sheets<br />
which reflected little<br />
variation between<br />
marks awarded by the<br />
marker <strong>and</strong> the internal<br />
<strong>and</strong> external<br />
moderators.<br />
Administration<br />
The prescribed<br />
procedures were<br />
mostly followed in 78%<br />
of the subjects.<br />
Markers signed their<br />
initials next to the<br />
questions that they had<br />
marked <strong>and</strong> the<br />
marker who totalled<br />
the script signed in full<br />
in 75% of the subjects.<br />
The name of the<br />
internal moderator was<br />
clear on 85% of the<br />
subjects/scripts.<br />
CHALLENGES<br />
SUBJECTS AFFECTED<br />
between accuracy <strong>and</strong> manipulation<br />
errors, did not underst<strong>and</strong> some of the<br />
computer terminology, e.g. row <strong>and</strong><br />
column headings, or how to<br />
award/penalise for horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical<br />
lines.<br />
Question was not marked according to the Concrete Structures<br />
marking guideline.<br />
In sample marking, the internal moderator Project Management<br />
reported that five markers had not<br />
adhered to the marking guideline in one<br />
question <strong>and</strong> hence the scripts were all<br />
remarked.<br />
Inexperienced markers were unable to Life Orientation P1 <strong>and</strong> P2<br />
interpret answers which were not identical English First Additional<br />
to the marking guideline.<br />
Language P1<strong>and</strong> P2<br />
Food Preparation<br />
New Venture Creation<br />
Markers were all novices which led to Hospitality Generics<br />
inconsistent marking <strong>and</strong> deviations from<br />
the marking guidelines. Markers tended to<br />
give credit for incorrect answers <strong>and</strong> were<br />
overly lenient in the awarding marks.<br />
Inability of the markers to interpret the Economic Environment<br />
questions <strong>and</strong> mark accordingly.<br />
The prescribed procedure for the allocation English First Additional<br />
of marks, the indication of marks per Language P1<br />
question <strong>and</strong> the indication of mistakes was<br />
on the whole not well done. In some<br />
subjects specific aspects were not adhered<br />
to.<br />
None of the markers kept to the correct Marketing Communication<br />
procedure throughout.<br />
Adding/totalling errors were evident. Applied Accounting P1<br />
Life Orientation P1 <strong>and</strong> P2<br />
Office Practice<br />
Consumer Behaviour<br />
An incorrect point was not always<br />
Applied Accounting P1<br />
indicated by a cross, e.g. it was left blank. Food Preparation<br />
Concrete Structures<br />
Marks were not entered on the mark sheet Mathematical Literacy P1<br />
as three digit numbers.<br />
<strong>and</strong> P2<br />
Advertising <strong>and</strong> Promotions<br />
Consumer Behaviour<br />
Food Preparation<br />
131