22.01.2015 Views

(Vocational) and - Umalusi

(Vocational) and - Umalusi

(Vocational) and - Umalusi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CRITERIA AND<br />

FINDINGS<br />

subjects. The markers<br />

worked together as<br />

teams, discussing<br />

problems as they<br />

arose.<br />

There was a high level<br />

of consistency in<br />

marking, as evidenced<br />

in the verification of<br />

marking control sheets<br />

which reflected little<br />

variation between<br />

marks awarded by the<br />

marker <strong>and</strong> the internal<br />

<strong>and</strong> external<br />

moderators.<br />

Administration<br />

The prescribed<br />

procedures were<br />

mostly followed in 78%<br />

of the subjects.<br />

Markers signed their<br />

initials next to the<br />

questions that they had<br />

marked <strong>and</strong> the<br />

marker who totalled<br />

the script signed in full<br />

in 75% of the subjects.<br />

The name of the<br />

internal moderator was<br />

clear on 85% of the<br />

subjects/scripts.<br />

CHALLENGES<br />

SUBJECTS AFFECTED<br />

between accuracy <strong>and</strong> manipulation<br />

errors, did not underst<strong>and</strong> some of the<br />

computer terminology, e.g. row <strong>and</strong><br />

column headings, or how to<br />

award/penalise for horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical<br />

lines.<br />

Question was not marked according to the Concrete Structures<br />

marking guideline.<br />

In sample marking, the internal moderator Project Management<br />

reported that five markers had not<br />

adhered to the marking guideline in one<br />

question <strong>and</strong> hence the scripts were all<br />

remarked.<br />

Inexperienced markers were unable to Life Orientation P1 <strong>and</strong> P2<br />

interpret answers which were not identical English First Additional<br />

to the marking guideline.<br />

Language P1<strong>and</strong> P2<br />

Food Preparation<br />

New Venture Creation<br />

Markers were all novices which led to Hospitality Generics<br />

inconsistent marking <strong>and</strong> deviations from<br />

the marking guidelines. Markers tended to<br />

give credit for incorrect answers <strong>and</strong> were<br />

overly lenient in the awarding marks.<br />

Inability of the markers to interpret the Economic Environment<br />

questions <strong>and</strong> mark accordingly.<br />

The prescribed procedure for the allocation English First Additional<br />

of marks, the indication of marks per Language P1<br />

question <strong>and</strong> the indication of mistakes was<br />

on the whole not well done. In some<br />

subjects specific aspects were not adhered<br />

to.<br />

None of the markers kept to the correct Marketing Communication<br />

procedure throughout.<br />

Adding/totalling errors were evident. Applied Accounting P1<br />

Life Orientation P1 <strong>and</strong> P2<br />

Office Practice<br />

Consumer Behaviour<br />

An incorrect point was not always<br />

Applied Accounting P1<br />

indicated by a cross, e.g. it was left blank. Food Preparation<br />

Concrete Structures<br />

Marks were not entered on the mark sheet Mathematical Literacy P1<br />

as three digit numbers.<br />

<strong>and</strong> P2<br />

Advertising <strong>and</strong> Promotions<br />

Consumer Behaviour<br />

Food Preparation<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!