26.01.2015 Views

One Hundred Years of Federal Mining Safety and Health Research

One Hundred Years of Federal Mining Safety and Health Research

One Hundred Years of Federal Mining Safety and Health Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.6 Expansion <strong>of</strong> the USBM Mission<br />

By 1912, the USBM recognized that most fatalities in coal mine explosions were caused by the<br />

release <strong>of</strong> toxic mine gases rather than the explosions themselves. In emergencies, some rescued<br />

miners had successfully barricaded themselves in isolated areas <strong>of</strong> the mine where the air was<br />

breathable, <strong>and</strong> thus were not affected by the gases. In response, the Bureau’s second annual<br />

report [USBM 1912] described refuge chambers that might be built in mines for use by miners<br />

after an explosion. The chambers would be simple in construction <strong>and</strong> contain food, water, <strong>and</strong><br />

first aid materials. Several Bureau engineers advocated that they be made available in all coal<br />

mines. The report also introduced the possibility <strong>of</strong> providing a protected telephone for<br />

communication <strong>and</strong> boreholes to the chambers in mines closest to the surface.<br />

The largest cause <strong>of</strong> fatalities in coal mines in 1912 was falls <strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> coal, with ro<strong>of</strong> falls also<br />

identified as the greatest safety hazard in metal mines. The Bureau noted that the mining<br />

systems in use may have been key to the problem, as mines in Europe appeared to have lower<br />

fatality rates. At the time, U.S. mines used less timber for ro<strong>of</strong> support <strong>and</strong> suffered from a less<br />

safe use <strong>of</strong> explosives [USBM 1912].<br />

A new Organic Act for the Bureau was passed by Congress <strong>and</strong> signed by President Taft on<br />

February 25, 1913. This new act broadened the scope <strong>and</strong> more clearly defined the mission <strong>of</strong><br />

the Bureau, charging it as follows:<br />

. . . to conduct inquiries <strong>and</strong> scientific <strong>and</strong> technologic investigations concerning mining,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the preparation, treatment, <strong>and</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> mineral substances with a view to<br />

improving health conditions, <strong>and</strong> increasing safety, efficiency, economic development,<br />

<strong>and</strong> conserving resources through prevention <strong>of</strong> waste in the mining, quarrying,<br />

metallurgical, <strong>and</strong> other mineral industries [USBM 1913].<br />

The Bureau’s purpose was described concisely at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the fourth annual report: to<br />

conduct research to “lead to increased safety, efficiency, <strong>and</strong> economy in the mining industry <strong>of</strong><br />

the United States” [USBM 1914]. Congress required that the Bureau should not conduct<br />

investigations on behalf <strong>of</strong> private parties nor promote individual business enterprises. The<br />

Bureau policy was to be nonpartisan, favoring neither the miner nor the mine operator. Its<br />

function was to st<strong>and</strong> for the welfare <strong>of</strong> all workers in the mining industry, the industry itself,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the public.<br />

The Bureau’s fourth annual report [USBM 1914] also stated the general policy under which the<br />

Bureau operated relative to other mining stakeholders:<br />

1. that the National Government conduct the necessary general inquiries <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

in relation to mining industries <strong>and</strong> disseminate in such manner as may prove most<br />

effective the information obtained <strong>and</strong> the conclusions reached;<br />

2. that each State enact needed legislation <strong>and</strong> make ample provision for the proper<br />

inspection <strong>of</strong> mining operations within its borders;<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!