26.01.2015 Views

One Hundred Years of Federal Mining Safety and Health Research

One Hundred Years of Federal Mining Safety and Health Research

One Hundred Years of Federal Mining Safety and Health Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Novel approaches undertaken by NIOSH staff have recently identified counties in the coalfields<br />

with high rates <strong>of</strong> rapid pneumoconiosis progression among active miners [Antao et al. 2005,<br />

2006]. The reasons for this apparent rapid progression <strong>and</strong> continuing occurrence <strong>of</strong> progressive<br />

massive fibrosis are not entirely clear. However, they may result from a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

inadequacies in the present dust limit <strong>and</strong> its method <strong>of</strong> enforcement. Certainly, these<br />

occurrences point to the need for continued monitoring activities to track disease <strong>and</strong> for<br />

continued research on enhanced exposure assessment <strong>and</strong> dust control.<br />

6.2.3 Personal Dust Monitor (PDM)<br />

In 1996, the Secretary <strong>of</strong> Labor asked NIOSH to develop a better dust monitoring instrument for<br />

coal mining. At that time, the coal mine personal sampler, a rugged <strong>and</strong> reasonably accurate<br />

instrument, had been in use for about 30 years. Nevertheless, because the internal filter must be<br />

weighed in a lab, there was always a delay <strong>of</strong> a week or more in getting measurement results<br />

back to the mine operator. Meanwhile, the miners themselves seldom had any knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

their dust exposure measurements. This delay meant that miners could be exposed to excessive<br />

dust levels without having the chance to immediately correct the problem <strong>and</strong> avoid<br />

overexposures.<br />

Initial work to develop a better dust monitoring instrument focused on a machine-mounted areasampling<br />

monitor, but NIOSH found this to be inadequate for compliance sampling <strong>of</strong> miners’<br />

dust exposure. Further, NIOSH findings showed no consistent relationship between personal<br />

sampling equipment worn by workers <strong>and</strong> area samples.<br />

The work was then redirected in 1999 to develop a mass-based, continuous dust monitor that was<br />

small <strong>and</strong> light enough to be worn by the workers. Called a personal dust monitor, or PDM, it<br />

retained most <strong>of</strong> the features <strong>of</strong> the previous machine-mounted area monitor. <strong>One</strong> <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important <strong>of</strong> these features was its ability to read out the gravimetric dust level during the work<br />

shift <strong>and</strong> to predict the full-shift dust level if nothing changed in the mining situation. This<br />

allowed workers <strong>and</strong> mine management to immediately correct dust controls to lower dust levels,<br />

thereby avoiding overexposure <strong>of</strong> the workers. At the end <strong>of</strong> the shift, the PDM data could be<br />

downloaded into a computer <strong>and</strong> stored for future reference. The concept was to empower<br />

miners <strong>and</strong> mine management to act on possible dust overexposures in real time. Conveniently,<br />

the dust monitor was built into a miner’s cap lamp unit so that miners were putting on their dust<br />

monitors when they put on their cap lamps. The PDM underwent an extensive field evaluation<br />

to assess accuracy, reliability, <strong>and</strong> acceptance by mine workers, <strong>and</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the field<br />

evaluation were very positive (see Figure 39).<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!