Program Book
Program Book
Program Book
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1940 RB15<br />
PROTON THERAPY FOR RECURRENT LOCALLY<br />
ADVANCED RETINOBLASTOMA: COMBINED RESULTS<br />
FROM THE RETINOBLASTOMA CENTER OF HOUSTON<br />
& INDIANA UNIVERSITY<br />
D.S. Gombos MD FACS; A.L. Chang MD; D.L. Andolino MD; H.P. Fontanilla<br />
MD; C. Herzog MD; M. Chintagumpala MD; P. Zage MD; R. Hurwitz MD;<br />
P. Chevez-Barrios MD; A. Mahajan MD (dgombos@mdanderson.org)<br />
The Retinoblastoma Center of Houston<br />
MD Anderson Cancer Center<br />
Indiana University<br />
Texas Children’’s Cancer Center<br />
The Methodist Hospital Research Insitute<br />
Baylor College of Medicine<br />
Purpose. Despite significant advances with systemic and local<br />
chemotherapeutic modalities, relapsed retinoblastoma can be salvaged<br />
with adjuvant radiotherapy. We present a cohort of patients treated with<br />
fractionated proton beam radiotherapy for recurrent locally advanced<br />
retinoblastoma.<br />
Methods. A review of all patients with recurrent retinoblastoma treated<br />
with proton beam radiotherapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center and the<br />
Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute.<br />
Results. 14 patients / 16 eyes were treated. Median treatment dose was<br />
45 CGE with a median dose to the bony orbit of 24 CGE. Local control<br />
was achieved in 6 of 16 eyes (38%). Median time to local failure was<br />
eight months. Toxicity included peri-orbital erythema, cataract, retinal<br />
vasculopathy and neovascular glaucoma.<br />
Conclusions. Proton beam radiotherapy can be used in the salvage<br />
setting for patients with advanced disease refractory to other treatments<br />
with results comparable to other series.<br />
Dosimetric planning is superior to other modalities.<br />
Financial disclosure. Dr Gombos is a member of the Children’s Oncology Group and has received<br />
reimbursement for travel. He has provided consultation for IMS Health.<br />
1828 RB16<br />
COMPARISON OF HIGH-RISK HISTOPATHOLOGY<br />
BETWEEN UNTREATED AND TREATED EYES OF PA-<br />
TIENTS WITH RETINOBLASTOMA<br />
M.W. Wilson1,2,5, R. Brennan3,6, C. Rodriguez-Galindo3,6, C. Billups4,<br />
B.G. Haik5, I. Qaddoumi3,6 (mwilson5@uthsc.edu)<br />
Departments of 1. Surgery, 2. Pathology, 3. Oncology, and 4. Biostatics,<br />
St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA<br />
Departments of 5. Ophthalmology and 6. Pediatrics, University of<br />
Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA<br />
Purpose. To compare high risk histology between untreated and treated<br />
eyes of patients with retinoblastoma.<br />
Methods. A retrospective study identified 177 eyes of 172 patients<br />
enucleated between February 1986 and September 2010. Review of<br />
ocular histopathology focused on high risk features: tumor invasion of<br />
the anterior chamber, iris, ciliary body, choroid (massive), retro-laminar<br />
optic nerve, or sclera, and/or extraocular disease.<br />
Results. 116 eyes of 115 patients were primarily enucleated. The<br />
untreated group had a higher proportion of Reese-Ellsworth (RE) Group<br />
V eyes, 94% versus 59% (p0.19). Forty of the 52 patients were further<br />
treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n=40) and/or external beam<br />
radiation (n=12). 3 patients died; 2 untreated from metastatic disease<br />
despite adjuvant therapy and 1 with metastatic disease at diagnosis<br />
from complications related to bone marrow transplant.<br />
Conclusions. Despite more favorable Reese-Ellsworth Grouping, treated<br />
eyes with retinoblastoma had an equal risk of harbouring HRH compared<br />
to untreated eyes, committing patients to further adjuvant therapy.<br />
Financial disclosure. None<br />
2 Rb17<br />
PATHOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN UNILATERAL RETINO-<br />
BLASTOMA WITH & WITHOUT HISTOPATHOLOGIC<br />
HIGH-RISK FEATURES & THE ROLE OF ADJUVANT<br />
CHEMOTHERAPY: A COG STUDY<br />
P. Chévez-Barrios1-3,11, R. Eagle1,4, D. Albert1,5, G. Vemuganti6, S.<br />
Krishnakumar7, B. Langholz1, S. Honavar6, J. O’Brien1,8,9, A. Leahey1,8,<br />
K. Matthay1,10, A. Meadows1,8, M. Chintagumpala1,3,11<br />
(pchevez-barrios@tmhs.org)<br />
1. Children’s Oncology Group<br />
2. The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA<br />
3. Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, TX, USA<br />
4. Will’s Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />
5. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA<br />
6. LV Prasad Eye Institute, India<br />
7. Vision and Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, India<br />
8. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia , PA , USA<br />
9. Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />
10. University of California San Francisco Medical Center-Parnassus, CA, USA<br />
11. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA<br />
Purpose. Children’’s Oncology Group (COG) finalized a prospective<br />
multicenter international study in patients with unilateral retinoblastoma<br />
undergoing enucleation to determine the prevalence of specific, strictly<br />
defined histopathologic (high-risk) features (HRFs) and the role of<br />
chemotherapy to prevent recurrences.<br />
Methods. Eyes enucleated for unilateral retinoblastoma were submitted<br />
for central review and three pathologists (PCB, RE, DA) independently<br />
reviewed the slides. Additional slides were requested if material was<br />
thought inadequate for interpretation. Central pathology consensus<br />
stratified patients with one or more of the following: posterior uveal<br />
invasion >3mm, any degree of concomitant optic nerve and choroid<br />
involvement, and post-lamina optic nerve involvement. These patients<br />
received chemotherapy; others were observed.<br />
Results. Of 312 patients with central review, 49 patients had their risk<br />
classification changed (13% of initial non-risk had HRFs, 24% of initial<br />
HRFs had non-HRFs). The most important reason for discrepancy was<br />
initial inadequate sections and sampling. 92 patients (29.48%) had HRFs<br />
(post-laminar 16.35%, massive choroidal invasion 13.46 %, concomitant<br />
optic nerve and choroidal invasion 10.58%, others 10.89%) requiring<br />
adjuvant chemotherapy. Three of 312 patients developed recurrences.<br />
Conclusions. The study highlights the importance of histopathology