14.11.2012 Views

Program Book

Program Book

Program Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1940 RB15<br />

PROTON THERAPY FOR RECURRENT LOCALLY<br />

ADVANCED RETINOBLASTOMA: COMBINED RESULTS<br />

FROM THE RETINOBLASTOMA CENTER OF HOUSTON<br />

& INDIANA UNIVERSITY<br />

D.S. Gombos MD FACS; A.L. Chang MD; D.L. Andolino MD; H.P. Fontanilla<br />

MD; C. Herzog MD; M. Chintagumpala MD; P. Zage MD; R. Hurwitz MD;<br />

P. Chevez-Barrios MD; A. Mahajan MD (dgombos@mdanderson.org)<br />

The Retinoblastoma Center of Houston<br />

MD Anderson Cancer Center<br />

Indiana University<br />

Texas Children’’s Cancer Center<br />

The Methodist Hospital Research Insitute<br />

Baylor College of Medicine<br />

Purpose. Despite significant advances with systemic and local<br />

chemotherapeutic modalities, relapsed retinoblastoma can be salvaged<br />

with adjuvant radiotherapy. We present a cohort of patients treated with<br />

fractionated proton beam radiotherapy for recurrent locally advanced<br />

retinoblastoma.<br />

Methods. A review of all patients with recurrent retinoblastoma treated<br />

with proton beam radiotherapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center and the<br />

Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute.<br />

Results. 14 patients / 16 eyes were treated. Median treatment dose was<br />

45 CGE with a median dose to the bony orbit of 24 CGE. Local control<br />

was achieved in 6 of 16 eyes (38%). Median time to local failure was<br />

eight months. Toxicity included peri-orbital erythema, cataract, retinal<br />

vasculopathy and neovascular glaucoma.<br />

Conclusions. Proton beam radiotherapy can be used in the salvage<br />

setting for patients with advanced disease refractory to other treatments<br />

with results comparable to other series.<br />

Dosimetric planning is superior to other modalities.<br />

Financial disclosure. Dr Gombos is a member of the Children’s Oncology Group and has received<br />

reimbursement for travel. He has provided consultation for IMS Health.<br />

1828 RB16<br />

COMPARISON OF HIGH-RISK HISTOPATHOLOGY<br />

BETWEEN UNTREATED AND TREATED EYES OF PA-<br />

TIENTS WITH RETINOBLASTOMA<br />

M.W. Wilson1,2,5, R. Brennan3,6, C. Rodriguez-Galindo3,6, C. Billups4,<br />

B.G. Haik5, I. Qaddoumi3,6 (mwilson5@uthsc.edu)<br />

Departments of 1. Surgery, 2. Pathology, 3. Oncology, and 4. Biostatics,<br />

St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA<br />

Departments of 5. Ophthalmology and 6. Pediatrics, University of<br />

Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA<br />

Purpose. To compare high risk histology between untreated and treated<br />

eyes of patients with retinoblastoma.<br />

Methods. A retrospective study identified 177 eyes of 172 patients<br />

enucleated between February 1986 and September 2010. Review of<br />

ocular histopathology focused on high risk features: tumor invasion of<br />

the anterior chamber, iris, ciliary body, choroid (massive), retro-laminar<br />

optic nerve, or sclera, and/or extraocular disease.<br />

Results. 116 eyes of 115 patients were primarily enucleated. The<br />

untreated group had a higher proportion of Reese-Ellsworth (RE) Group<br />

V eyes, 94% versus 59% (p0.19). Forty of the 52 patients were further<br />

treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n=40) and/or external beam<br />

radiation (n=12). 3 patients died; 2 untreated from metastatic disease<br />

despite adjuvant therapy and 1 with metastatic disease at diagnosis<br />

from complications related to bone marrow transplant.<br />

Conclusions. Despite more favorable Reese-Ellsworth Grouping, treated<br />

eyes with retinoblastoma had an equal risk of harbouring HRH compared<br />

to untreated eyes, committing patients to further adjuvant therapy.<br />

Financial disclosure. None<br />

2 Rb17<br />

PATHOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN UNILATERAL RETINO-<br />

BLASTOMA WITH & WITHOUT HISTOPATHOLOGIC<br />

HIGH-RISK FEATURES & THE ROLE OF ADJUVANT<br />

CHEMOTHERAPY: A COG STUDY<br />

P. Chévez-Barrios1-3,11, R. Eagle1,4, D. Albert1,5, G. Vemuganti6, S.<br />

Krishnakumar7, B. Langholz1, S. Honavar6, J. O’Brien1,8,9, A. Leahey1,8,<br />

K. Matthay1,10, A. Meadows1,8, M. Chintagumpala1,3,11<br />

(pchevez-barrios@tmhs.org)<br />

1. Children’s Oncology Group<br />

2. The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA<br />

3. Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, TX, USA<br />

4. Will’s Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />

5. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA<br />

6. LV Prasad Eye Institute, India<br />

7. Vision and Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, India<br />

8. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia , PA , USA<br />

9. Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />

10. University of California San Francisco Medical Center-Parnassus, CA, USA<br />

11. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA<br />

Purpose. Children’’s Oncology Group (COG) finalized a prospective<br />

multicenter international study in patients with unilateral retinoblastoma<br />

undergoing enucleation to determine the prevalence of specific, strictly<br />

defined histopathologic (high-risk) features (HRFs) and the role of<br />

chemotherapy to prevent recurrences.<br />

Methods. Eyes enucleated for unilateral retinoblastoma were submitted<br />

for central review and three pathologists (PCB, RE, DA) independently<br />

reviewed the slides. Additional slides were requested if material was<br />

thought inadequate for interpretation. Central pathology consensus<br />

stratified patients with one or more of the following: posterior uveal<br />

invasion >3mm, any degree of concomitant optic nerve and choroid<br />

involvement, and post-lamina optic nerve involvement. These patients<br />

received chemotherapy; others were observed.<br />

Results. Of 312 patients with central review, 49 patients had their risk<br />

classification changed (13% of initial non-risk had HRFs, 24% of initial<br />

HRFs had non-HRFs). The most important reason for discrepancy was<br />

initial inadequate sections and sampling. 92 patients (29.48%) had HRFs<br />

(post-laminar 16.35%, massive choroidal invasion 13.46 %, concomitant<br />

optic nerve and choroidal invasion 10.58%, others 10.89%) requiring<br />

adjuvant chemotherapy. Three of 312 patients developed recurrences.<br />

Conclusions. The study highlights the importance of histopathology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!