14.11.2012 Views

Program Book

Program Book

Program Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Purpose. To determine the presence of genetic heterogeneity (for<br />

chromosomes 3 and 8) in uveal tract melanoma and correlate this with<br />

tumour size and morphology.<br />

Methods. Ninety-five patients who underwent enucleation for primary<br />

uveal melanoma in the period of 2009-2011 were included in the study.<br />

Tumour dimensions were preoperatively measured (height, maximal<br />

diameter). Corresponding areas and volumes were calculated. Tumour<br />

morphology was classified in separate subcategories (collar-stud,<br />

dome-shaped, bilobed, multilobed, diffuse and other) through B-mode<br />

ultrasonography.<br />

Double blind analysis of uveal tract melanoma by fine needle aspiration<br />

biopsy (FNAB) (from the centre of the tumour) vs punch biopsy (from<br />

the base of the tumour) to assess the presence of genetic heterogeneity<br />

of chromosomes 3 and 8 using the appropriate probes. Results were<br />

correlated with tumour dimensions, tumour size according to COMS<br />

classification and tumour morphology. In addition the yield of FNAB was<br />

determined and similar correlations were done.<br />

Results. Fine needle aspiration biopsy yield i.e. sufficient cells for<br />

diagnosis was seen in 77% (73/ 95) of tumours. Yield was higher in large<br />

tumours according to the COMS classification (83% of large melanomas).<br />

The yield was worst for bilobed tumours (36%, 4/11).<br />

Genetic heterogeneity (GH) between FNAB and punch biopsies was<br />

assessed in the remaining 72 patients. GH was 4% (3 out of 72 tumours)<br />

for chromosome 3 and 21% (15 out of 72 tumours) for chromosome 8.<br />

Genetic heterogeneity strongly correlated with collar-stud morphology<br />

for chromosome 3 (100%, 3 out of 3 tumours) and for chromosome 8<br />

(53%, 8 out of 15 tumours). In addition heterogeneity for chromosome<br />

8 strongly correlated with large melanomas, according to COMS<br />

classification (73%, 11 out of 15 tumours)<br />

Conclusions. Genetic heterogeneity for chromosomes 3 and 8 is<br />

strongly associated with collar-stud lesion morphology. Heterogeneity<br />

for chromosome 8 is correlated with large uveal melanoma.<br />

Financial disclosure. None<br />

49 UM8<br />

DEVELOPMENTS IN PREDICTING METASTASIS FROM<br />

CHOROIDAL MELANOMA<br />

B.E. Damato, A. Eleuteri, A.F. Taktak, S.E. Coupland (bertil.damato@<br />

gmail.com)<br />

Royal Liverpool University Hospital; University of Liverpool<br />

Purpose. We previously developed prognostic models using neural<br />

networks but these were inaccurate when baseline data were incomplete.<br />

We therefore devoped new models based on Accelerated Failure Time.<br />

The aim of this presentation is to evaluate our improved tool in terms of<br />

its ability to estimate survival probability after treatment of choroidal<br />

melanoma.<br />

Methods. Data from 3653 patients were used to generate models for<br />

predicting all-cause mortality.<br />

The program produced all-cause mortality curves for patients and<br />

controls, thereby allowing risk of metastatic mortality to be estimated.<br />

Results. The predicted morality correlated well with the observed<br />

mortality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, 0.79. p value 0.80). The C-index<br />

for discrimination (correlating predictions with risk factors) was 0.75 for<br />

the clinical model and 0.79 for the laboratory model (with fewer data).<br />

Conclusions. Our AFT model is a significant improvement over neural<br />

networks and provides reasonably reliable prognosis relevant to<br />

individual patients with choroidal melanoma.<br />

Financial disclosure. None<br />

UVEAL MELANOMA<br />

Abstracts<br />

98<br />

444 UM9<br />

FISH-BASED PROGNOSTICATION OF UVEAL MELA-<br />

NOMA<br />

M. Turell 1, R. Tubbs 2 , C. Biscotti 3 , L. Schoenfield 3, Y. Sun 2 , G. Bebek<br />

4 , Y. Saunthararajah 5, P. Triozzi 6, A. Singh1 (turellm2@ccf.org)<br />

1. Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation<br />

2. Department of Molecular Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation<br />

3. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation<br />

4. Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve<br />

University<br />

5. Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic Foundation<br />

6. Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH<br />

Purpose. To compare detection of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma<br />

using single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A) and fluorescence<br />

in situ hybridization (FISH)<br />

Methods. Consecutive cases of uveal melanoma treated by enucleation<br />

from 2004 to 2010 were analyzed. DNA was isolated from fresh frozen<br />

tissue and was analyzed by SNP-A (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and by FISH<br />

using both centromeric (CEP3) and locus-specific (3p26) probes (Abbott<br />

Molecular, Des Plains, IL). A total of 200 interphase cells were scored<br />

and a cut-point of 20% was used to determine monosomy 3 status.<br />

Results. In this series, there were 50 Caucasian patients including 28<br />

males (56%) and 22 females (44%) with an average age at diagnosis<br />

of 64 years. Tumor location was choroidal in 24 (48%), ciliochoroidal<br />

in 18 (36%), and iridociliochoroidal in 8 cases (16%). Monosomy 3<br />

was detected by either SNP-A or FISH (CEP3) in 33 cases (66%). SNP-A<br />

detected monosomy 3 in 31 tumors (94%). CEP3 probe detected 25<br />

cases of monosomy 3 (76%). Locus-specific FISH probe (3p26) detected<br />

deletion in 28 of 31 cases (90%) of monosomy 3 positive tumors by<br />

SNP-A and every case of of monosomy 3 by CEP3 probe.<br />

Conclusions. There is a strong correlation between monosomy 3 detected<br />

by SNP-A and by 3p26 deletion detected by locus-specific FISH probe.<br />

Financial disclosure. This work was supported by a Falk Trust grant<br />

and a Research to Prevent Blindness Challenge Grant, Department of<br />

Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.<br />

1819 UM10<br />

FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION VS MULTI-<br />

PLEX LIGATION-DEPENDENT PROBE AMPLIFICATION<br />

FOR UVEAL MELANOMA PROGNOSTICATION: IN-VI-<br />

VO COMPARATIVE RESULTS<br />

Raffaele Parrozzani1, Elisabetta Pilotto2, Alessia Dario2, Giacomo<br />

Miglionico2, Edoardo Midena1,2 (parrozzani@libero.it)<br />

1. GB Bietti Eye Foundation, IRCCS, Roma, Italy.<br />

2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.<br />

Purpose. To compare fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and<br />

multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for uveal<br />

melanoma prognostication.<br />

Methods. Twenty-four patients affected by posterior uveal melanoma<br />

and scheduled for I125 brachytherapy were included in this prospective<br />

study. Patients underwent in-vivo 25-G transcleral FNAB (two passes)<br />

just before applying the radioactive plaque. Sampled material underwent<br />

both FISH and MLPA analysis using standard procedures. Follow-up was<br />

longer than 24 months.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!