Program Book
Program Book
Program Book
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Methods. A retrospective chart review of 26 eyes of 25 patients receiving<br />
three-drug (melphalan, topotecan, and carboplatin) multi agent SSIAC<br />
was conducted between May 2006 and June 2011.<br />
Results. Twenty-six eyes, Reese-Ellsworth group 5b (22) 5a (1) 4a (2)<br />
and 3a (1), received 61 infusions of 3 drug multiagent chemotherapy<br />
for rescue of eyes with advanced retinoblastoma. The dose range for<br />
melphalan was 2.5 to 7.5 mg, 0.3 to 0.6 mg for topotecan, and 30 to 50<br />
mg for carboplatin. The median number of multi drug infusions was 2<br />
with a maximum of 4 and minimum of 1 averaging 2.3 per eye. Fourteen<br />
of 25(56%) patients presented after failing intravenous chemotherapy<br />
(IVC), 2/25(8%) after failing IVC and external beam radiotherapy and<br />
1/25(4%) after failing IVC and plaque brachytherapy. Twenty-four /26<br />
(92)% of eyes were salvage over a mean follow up period of 14 mo. (1-43<br />
mo.) Electroretinogram (ERG) showed improvement greater than in 25mv<br />
in 4/26 eyes (15%), greater than 25-mv loss in 12/26 eyes(46%), no<br />
change greater than 25mv in 10/26 eyes(39%).<br />
Conclusions. We have successfully used three-drug multiagent SSIAC to<br />
rescue eyes that have failed IVC and/ or single or double agent SSIAC.<br />
A significant portion of eyes avoided enucleation and retained ERG<br />
function. . Further investigation into multiagent SSIAC is required to<br />
determine its role in treatment of advanced retinoblastoma.<br />
Financial disclosure. None<br />
1550 RB27<br />
OCULAR COMPLICATIONS OF DIRECT INTRA-OPH-<br />
THALMIC ARTERY MELPHALAN TREATMENT FOR RE-<br />
FRACTORY RETINOBLASTOMA<br />
M Ashwin Reddy1,2, Wisam J. Muen1, Judith Kingston1,3, John<br />
Hungerford2, Fergus Robertson4, Stefan Brew4, Mandeep Sagoo1,2,<br />
Dorothy Thompson5 (mashwinreddy@hotmail.com)<br />
1. Retinoblastoma Unit, Barts & the London NHS Trust, Royal London<br />
Hospital, Whitechapel Road<br />
2. Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road<br />
3. Oncology Department, Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital<br />
4. National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queens Square<br />
5. Ophthalmology Department, Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital,<br />
London, UK<br />
Purpose. We report on patients receiving Intra-ophthalmic Artery<br />
Melphalan (IAM), which was delivered via direct catheterisation of the<br />
ophthalmic artery in cases of retinoblastoma refractory to systemic<br />
chemotherapy +/- radiation .<br />
Methods. All cases undergoing IAM between May 09 to August 10 were<br />
included and the results of ocular complications including reduced<br />
vision were recorded. Minimum follow-up was 11 months.<br />
Results. 15 eyes of 14 patients were treated. 5 developed IIIrd nerve<br />
palsies which resolved within 6 months. 5 patients with prior radiation<br />
developed more severe ocular complications. 2 patients demonstrated<br />
good ERG function post-treatment but a subtle deterioration of patternonset<br />
VEPs. 1 child had her vision reduce from 20/20 to 20/40 with<br />
treatment. 10 of 15 eyes (66%) showed a good tumour response. 2<br />
patients with vitreous seeding required enucleation despite systemic<br />
chemotherapy and intraarterial melphalan.<br />
Conclusions. Potentially amblyogenic complications may occur when<br />
using direct IAM. Complications are exacerbated with prior radiation.<br />
Families undergoing this experimental treatment need to be counselled<br />
accordingly.<br />
Financial disclosure. None<br />
RETINOBLASTOMA<br />
Abstracts<br />
44<br />
438 RB28<br />
LIMITATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICA-<br />
TION IN PREDICTING SUCCESS OF INTRA-ARTERIAL<br />
CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GROUP D/E INTRAOCULAR<br />
RETINOBLASTOMA<br />
Sotiria Palioura, MD, PhD, Y. Pierre Gobin, MD, Scott E. Brodie, MD, PhD,<br />
Brian P. Marr, MD, Ira J. Dunkel, MD, and David H. Abramson, MD (sotiria.<br />
palioura@gmail.com)<br />
Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,<br />
New York. Currently, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye<br />
and Ear Infirmary, Boston. Division of Interventional Neuroradiology,<br />
Departments of Radiology, Neurosurgery and Neurology, Weill Cornell<br />
Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York; Ophthalmic<br />
Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York;<br />
and Department of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine,<br />
New York; Brian P. Marr: Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial<br />
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Department of Pediatrics,<br />
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; David H. Abramson:<br />
Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,<br />
New York, NY, USA.<br />
Purpose. To report the success rate of superselective ophthalmic<br />
artery chemotherapy for International Classification group D and E<br />
retinoblastoma eyes and to compare it to reported success rates of<br />
systemic chemoreduction.<br />
Methods. Retrospective review of 41 group D (n=33) and E (n=8) eyes of<br />
40 retinoblastoma patients who were treated (May 2006-June 2011) with<br />
intra-arterial chemotherapy as primary treatment. Kaplan Meier data<br />
analysis on ocular event-free (enucleation or external beam radiation)<br />
survival is reported. The PubMed database was searched through June<br />
2011 for studies reporting success rates of systemic chemoreduction for<br />
Group D and E eyes.<br />
Results. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of ocular event-free survival at 2<br />
years were 75.5% (95% confidence interval, 58.2%-92.9%) for group D<br />
eyes and 100% (95% confidence interval, 62.5%-100%) for group E eyes.<br />
The success rates of systemic chemoreduction for group D eyes reported<br />
in the literature range from 23% to 47%. According to our literature<br />
search, all group E eyes were enucleated either at presentation or after<br />
failed systemic chemoreduction and/or external beam radiation.<br />
Conclusions. The high success rate of intra-arterial chemotherapy for<br />
group D and E eyes suggests that the International Classification falls<br />
short when predicting intra-arterial treatment success. It seems that<br />
clinical features used by the International Classification that would deem<br />
an eye “hopeless” for chemoreduction are not predictors of treatment<br />
failure when intra-arterial chemotherapy is used instead.<br />
Financial disclosure. None<br />
2330 RB29<br />
INTRA-ARTERIAL MELPHALAN DOSING REGIMENS<br />
FOR THE TREATMENT OF RETINOBLASTOMA<br />
Timothy G. Murray1, Samuel K. Houston1, Mohammad A. Aziz-Sultan2,<br />
Christina E. Fernandes3, Christina Decatur1, Yolanda Pina1 (TMurray@<br />
med.miami.edu)<br />
1. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute; 2. University of Miami, Department of<br />
Neurosurgery<br />
3. University of Miami, Department of Pediatrics