14.11.2012 Views

Program Book

Program Book

Program Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Purpose. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) refers to<br />

precancerous and cancerous lesions of the conjunctiva ranging form<br />

conjuctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to an invasive tumor with<br />

destruction of the orbital tissues. OSSN used to affect elderly men, yet<br />

this pattern has changed. In Africa the incidence is rising in younger<br />

persons, mostly women around 35 years of age. This increasing<br />

prevalence is probably due to HIV infection and HPV co-infections.<br />

Methods. Clinical and immunological analysis including testing of<br />

specific T cell interferon-gamma immune responses, and tissue HPV<br />

type analysis.<br />

Results. A 50 year-old female presented with complaints of chronical<br />

blepharoconjunctivitis which had existed for a couple of years. She was<br />

HIV positive and used antiretroviral medication infrequently. An eye<br />

examination revealed extensive leukoplakia of the palpebral and bulbar<br />

conjunctiva and cornea in the left eye. As a biopsy revealed squamous<br />

cell carcinoma with infiltration of the tarsal and bulbar conjunctiva of<br />

the left eye, exenteration of the left orbit was planned.<br />

When admitted to the hospital after a patients delay of a couple of<br />

months, the lesion of the conjunctival lesion had almost disappeared.<br />

The patient mentioned that she had restarted to take her HAART<br />

medication conscientiously.<br />

Earlier biopsies showed the presence of HPV 16, and at the time of tumor<br />

regression, anti-HPV16 T-cell responses were found to be present.<br />

Conclusions. Meticulous use of antiretroviral medication may cause<br />

regression of OSSN. It is unclear whether the medication targets the<br />

underlying HIV or HPV infection, or indirectly led to healing by allowing<br />

the recurrence of an anti-HPV16 T cell immune response. The lack of<br />

compliance in the use of therapy could be added to the list of risk factors<br />

for OSSN. Further research is needed to confirm this suggestion.<br />

Financial disclosure. None<br />

12 EC8<br />

RUTHENIUM PLAQUE THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT<br />

OF CONJUNCTIVAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA<br />

INVADING THE EYE<br />

Priscilla L. Ballalai, Virginia L. Torres, Roberto Segretto (pbbordon@<br />

terra.com.br)<br />

Ocular Oncology Section - Federal University of Sao Paulo<br />

Radiotherapy - Federal University of Sao Paulo<br />

Purpose. To describe the outcome of patients with conjunctival<br />

squamous cell carcinoma invading the eye treated with Ruthenium<br />

(Ru106) plaque therapy.<br />

Methods. Retrospective, non-comparative review of charts of patients<br />

referred to the University and private office with conjunctival squamous<br />

cell carcinoma (SCC) invading the eye, from January 2001 to July 2011.<br />

Patients with focal invasions at the cornea, sclera or iris and ciliary body<br />

were included. Patients with orbital infiltrations or extensive intraocular<br />

infiltrations were excluded. All patients were submitted to Ru 106 plaque<br />

therapy, and the treatment dose was 50 Gy. The duration of the treatment<br />

was calculated according to the UBM measurements with a 1 mm safety<br />

margin. The patients were followed with a complete ophthalmological<br />

examination and systemic evaluation after the treatment.<br />

Results. Twenty patients with conjunctival SCC invading the eye were<br />

seen by the authors from January 2001 to July 2011. Six of them were<br />

eligible for salvage therapy with ruthenium plaque therapy. One patient<br />

was HIV positive. The mean age was 58 yo (range 29-82 yo), 4 were<br />

females and 2 males. The mean follow up of was 31,5 mo (range 6 -108<br />

EYELID, CONJUNTIVA & ORBIT<br />

Abstracts<br />

69<br />

mo). All of them had been treated previously with surgery or surgery and<br />

topical chemotherapy (Mitomycin C and/or Interferon). The mean number<br />

of surgeries was 2,1 (range 1-4). The pathological evaluation confirmed<br />

the diagnosis of SCC in all patients. Infiltration of the corneal stroma<br />

was observed in 3 patients, deep scleral infiltration in 4 patients and<br />

iris and ciliary body infiltration in 1 patient. All patients had regression<br />

of the tumor after the treatment without recurrence in the treatment<br />

site or elsewhere. None of them presented distant metastasis. The only<br />

complication observed with this treatment was cataract, in 3 patients.<br />

Conclusions. Ruthenium plaque therapy is safe and effective in the<br />

management of eyes with focal infiltrations by conjunctival squamous<br />

cell carcinoma.<br />

Financial disclosure. None<br />

1059 EC9<br />

INVASIVE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE<br />

CONJUNCTIVA TREATED BY PROTONS<br />

W. Sauerwein1, J. Herault2, P. Chauvel2, H. Westekemper3, R.<br />

Darawsha3, B. Zimmermann1, C. Maschi4, A. Wittig5, L. Brualla1, J.-P.<br />

Caujolle4 (w.sauerwein@uni-due.de)<br />

1. University Duisburg- Essen, University Hospital Essen, Department of<br />

Radiation Oncology, Essen, Germany<br />

2. Cyclotron Biomédicale, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France<br />

3. University Duisburg- Essen, University Hospital Essen, Department of<br />

Ophthalmology, Essen, Germany<br />

4. Service d’Ophtalmologie, CHU Saint Roch, Nice, France<br />

5. Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Department of Radiation<br />

Oncology Marburg, Germany<br />

Purpose. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the conjunctiva is an<br />

extremely rare disease. The disease is suspected to be associated<br />

with atrophic dermatitis and HIV in young women. After local excision<br />

the tumor often recurs instead of adjuvant therapies such as cryocoagulation,<br />

local chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Conventional external<br />

beam radiotherapy with electrons or photons is not conducive as the<br />

dose needed to control the tumor will destroy the eye. A sufficient dose<br />

can only be delivered by brachytherapy if the tumor is localized on the<br />

eyeball and if the target volume can be covered by a radioactive plaque.<br />

Therefore, exenteration is often the only curative approach. Protons<br />

might offer an alternative as they can be collimated and modulated to<br />

cover a complex area of the conjunctiva including fornix and tarsus while<br />

protecting the inner part of the eye and radiosensitive structures in the<br />

neighbourhood.<br />

Methods. The irradiation technique was initially developed to treat<br />

melanoma of the conjunctiva. The target volume to be considered is<br />

large and individually shaped. It includes often more than half of the total<br />

surface of the conjunctiva, with the goal to avoid further relapses at the<br />

margin of the treated volume. Because of the large volume, the number of<br />

fractions has been extended as compared to conventional proton therapy of<br />

uveal melanoma. The dose applied is given in 6 fractions of 5.2 Gy (36 Gy<br />

RBE) followed by a boost of 2 fractions of 7 Gy (16 Gy RBE). The technical<br />

principles of the treatment are as follows: - the clips are inserted on the eye<br />

for localization of the target volume and positioning. A bolus is set-up on the<br />

lid to give a homogeneous flat entrance for the proton beam collimated to<br />

the size of the tumor, - the beam passes through a semi-spherical acrylic<br />

glass compensator to adapt the range of the proton beam to the shape<br />

the inner sclera and let the protons irradiate the thickness of sclera and<br />

conjunctiva. The compensator is individually customized from an acrylic<br />

glass block by a computerized milling machine. The resulting dose distribution is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!