27.01.2015 Views

geostationary telecommunications satellites electronic telephone set ...

geostationary telecommunications satellites electronic telephone set ...

geostationary telecommunications satellites electronic telephone set ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

137<br />

Table 1<br />

Budgeted maintenance contributions for<br />

the AR system of JTAS in Denmark<br />

System<br />

Hours/subscriber line or trunk line<br />

1970 1971 1972 1973<br />

Local exchange system with crossbar exchange type ARF<br />

Rural exchange system with crossbar exchange type ARK<br />

Transit exchange system with crossbar exchange type ARM<br />

0.35<br />

0.33<br />

5.0<br />

0.30 0.26 0.28<br />

0.28 0.25 0.22<br />

4.20 3.20 2.80<br />

mentioned principles for their crossbar<br />

exchanges or similar types of exchanges,<br />

have been able to successively<br />

improve the service quality and<br />

to reduce their maintenance staff.<br />

As early as 1956, at the first Maintenance<br />

Conference, LM Ericsson expressed<br />

the opinion that the maintenance<br />

work for a normally maintained<br />

ARF exchange should not exceed 0.3<br />

hours per subscriber line and year,<br />

with an operational reliability such that<br />

the fault rate does not exceed 0.1 % 4 .<br />

Certain administrations have achieved<br />

very much better results and others<br />

are on the way to doing this. An example<br />

of this is presented in the article<br />

from Holland. It may also be mentioned<br />

that an article by B. J. Carrol,<br />

Australia, contains a statement to the<br />

effect that: "It is the opinion of the<br />

author that terminal exchanges equipped<br />

for 10,000 lines can be maintained<br />

satisfactorily by one man" 3 , which corresponds<br />

to a maintenance contribution<br />

per line and year that is only one<br />

half of the standardized value of 0.3.<br />

JTAS in Denmark have reported figures<br />

for the maintenance of AR type of<br />

exchanges. It is interesting to note the<br />

reduction from year to year for the different<br />

systems, table 1.<br />

The crossbar exchanges of type AR<br />

have been in operation, with good results,<br />

for over 25 years. In no case has<br />

it been shown that the maintenance<br />

required has increased as the equipment<br />

becomes older. However, in certain<br />

cases there may be good reason<br />

for thoroughly investigating common<br />

relay equipment, such as markers, after<br />

10 to 15 years in service, since these<br />

are so few in numbers yet of such vital<br />

importance for the correct operation<br />

of the whole exchange. This does not<br />

in any way detract from the substantial<br />

advantages that are gained with CCM.<br />

References<br />

1. Broby, S.-B.: Electronic Traffic<br />

Route Tester TRT m 70. Ericsson<br />

Rev. 51 (1974): 3, pp. 80—87.<br />

2. Moot, G.: The Effect of Human<br />

Factors on some Aspects of<br />

Australian Post Office Maintenance<br />

Operations. Maintenance<br />

Conference 1974.<br />

3. Carrol, B. J.: Maintenance and<br />

Performance of LM Ericsson<br />

Crossbar Switching Equipment in<br />

Australia. Part 1 and 2. The Telecommunication<br />

Journal of Australia<br />

1973, pp. 72—77, 143—149.<br />

4. Hansson, K. G.: Maintenance<br />

Conferences at LM Ericson. Ericsson<br />

Rev. 52 (1975): 1, pp. 2—13.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!