27.01.2015 Views

geostationary telecommunications satellites electronic telephone set ...

geostationary telecommunications satellites electronic telephone set ...

geostationary telecommunications satellites electronic telephone set ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1<br />

Acquisition costs for different designs of<br />

complete power supply equipment for a large<br />

<strong>telephone</strong> exchange ol the SPC type.<br />

The power consumption ol the exchange is<br />

250 kW, the <strong>electronic</strong>s factor 60 "h and the mean<br />

distribution distance 45 m. The costs are<br />

related to the cost of a 48 V booster converter<br />

system<br />

Fig. 5<br />

Plant cost as a function of the <strong>electronic</strong>s<br />

factor. The plant data, apart from the<br />

<strong>electronic</strong>s factor, are given in the text of<br />

table 1. The cost is related to a 48 V booster<br />

converter system with 60 °/o <strong>electronic</strong>s factor<br />

A higher <strong>electronic</strong>s factor reduces the additional<br />

outlay for direct converters. However, more<br />

expensive rack converters (greater regulation<br />

range) means that even with an <strong>electronic</strong>s factor<br />

of 100 Vo the 140 V plant is still more expensive<br />

than the equivalent 48 V booster converter plant<br />

46 V booster converter system<br />

= = 140 V system<br />

% Relative plant cost<br />

creased regulation range would, on<br />

average, increase the cost of the converters<br />

by about 15%. Regulation of<br />

the distribution voltage with DC/DC<br />

booster converters is carried out centrally<br />

and using units with relatively<br />

high power. This gives a low cost per<br />

watt output power. To this must be<br />

added the fact that the principle of<br />

booster converters is particularly economical<br />

owing to the fact that only<br />

about 20% of the total power passes<br />

the main circuit of the converters.<br />

Calculations have shown that with<br />

booster converters the regulation cost<br />

per watt is between 5 % and 8 % of<br />

the cost per watt for small rack converters.<br />

If this cost is compared with the additional<br />

cost (15%) of an increased regulation<br />

range for the rack converters,<br />

it is clear that central regulation of the<br />

system voltage using DC/DC booster<br />

converters is definitely economically<br />

advantageous.<br />

Higher system voltage<br />

An analysis of the characteristics of a<br />

power supply system with a system<br />

voltage in the range MOV to 300V<br />

shows that there are essentially two<br />

kinds of advantages with such a system:<br />

1. As a result of the higher voltage the<br />

current in the distribution cables is<br />

reduced for a certain distributed<br />

power. Thus smaller distribution<br />

cables can be used with higher<br />

voltages.<br />

2. It is only to a very small extent that<br />

the system voltage can be used for<br />

direct feeding of the power consuming<br />

units. Thus practically all<br />

the power must pass through (regulated)<br />

converters before it reaches<br />

the units that consume it. This<br />

means that larger battery voltage<br />

variations can be permitted than in<br />

the case of, for example, the full<br />

float system or the cell switching<br />

100 % system. Thus the batteries can be<br />

Electronics factor utilized better since they can be<br />

discharged to a lower level when<br />

there is a mains failure. A considerable<br />

reduction in the size of the<br />

battery can be achieved in this way.<br />

The cost of the rectifiers will also<br />

be reduced to some extent since,<br />

among other things, the end cell<br />

rectifier will not be required.<br />

As can be seen, the cost reductions in<br />

point 2 are not actually caused by the<br />

increased system voltage, but rather<br />

by the introduction of an efficient regulation<br />

of the system voltage during<br />

emergency operation. The same advantages<br />

are of course obtained with,<br />

for example, a booster converter system.<br />

Cost comparison for different<br />

power supply systems<br />

The relative costs for some different<br />

designs of a power supply plant for a<br />

<strong>telephone</strong> exchange of the SPC type<br />

are shown in table 1. As an example a<br />

large exchange with a power consumption<br />

of 250 kW has been chosen. The<br />

<strong>electronic</strong>s factor is 60% and the<br />

mean length of the distribution cables<br />

is 45 metres. These values are typical<br />

for exchanges of this type and size.<br />

Battery saving possible both in 48 V<br />

and 140 V systems<br />

It can be seen from table 1 that the battery<br />

costs are considerably higher in<br />

the cell switching system than in the<br />

other alternatives. 2 There is, however,<br />

no difference between the remaining<br />

alternatives in this respect, which illustrates<br />

the above mentioned argument<br />

that, from the point of view of the battery,<br />

it is unimportant whether the<br />

voltage regulation of the distributed<br />

power takes place centrally, using<br />

booster converters or locally, using<br />

rack converters and direct converters<br />

for 140/48 V.<br />

For the 140 V system direct converters<br />

are also required<br />

In the 140 V system the costs for boost^r<br />

fi^nuortorp lit/ill r\f rnnroo ho cayoH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!