29.01.2015 Views

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

graphic maps. We present both sets of maps to allow the<br />

significance of the data on which our reconstructions are<br />

based to be easily assessed.<br />

This examination of the paleogeography and the paleotectonics<br />

of the region has clearly excluded some of<br />

the previous reconstructions, which scarcely considered<br />

important geological constraints. Our reconstructions,<br />

which are geometrically as simple as possible, are more<br />

consistent with the available data, but the data are limited<br />

and more work will be required to confirm some of<br />

our suggestions and extend others. In particular, large<br />

strike-slip motions such as those now occurring in Central<br />

Asia and Turkey could have occurred, but are undetectable.<br />

In this study we assume that ophiolites may<br />

represent the site of either a large old ocean or a small<br />

Red Sea type ocean. Evidence to distinguish between<br />

these for our reconstructions comes from large-scale<br />

geometric contraints and not from any known difference<br />

in the field observations of features left by their closure.<br />

Our account of the region, which starts in late Precambrian<br />

time, is divided into two sections. The first<br />

section describes the general evolution of Iran and the<br />

significance of various geological features in its interpretation<br />

and is intended to be an overview that is easy to<br />

read. The second section provides a detailed geological<br />

review and contains the data on which the interpretations<br />

of the first section are based. The major Iranian tectonosedimentary<br />

units together with their characteristics<br />

and the localities cited in the paper are given in Figs. 1<br />

and 2. Correlation charts of the Paleozoic, Mesozoic,<br />

and Tertiary formations, and sedimentary gaps and unconformities<br />

discussed in the text are given in Tables 1<br />

to3.<br />

1--Evolution of the region<br />

I. 1--PRECAMBRIAN<br />

It is not possible at present to produce a paleogeographic<br />

map and continental reconstructions prior to the<br />

Upper Precambrian. However, some features of Iran are<br />

recognizable from this period. These include a possible<br />

fossil island-arc (Chapedony, Posht-e-Badam), late Precambrian<br />

deformation followed by alkali-rift volcanism,<br />

the Hormoz Salt deposits with epicontinental red<br />

elastics, and some acid magmatism. Some major structures<br />

such as the Main Zagros, High Zagros, Chapedony,<br />

Posht-e-Badam, and Nayband faults apparently<br />

formed facies dividers in the Upper Precambrian and<br />

Lower Paleozoic (Figs. 3 and 10; see also Section II. 1).<br />

Like the Arabian craton, the Precambrian basement of<br />

Iran may be the crust from Precambrian calc-alkaline<br />

island arcs (see Section II.1), and if this is so their<br />

cratonization must have taken place prior to the deposition<br />

of the Upper Precambrian - Lower Cambrian salt,<br />

red detritus, and carbonates.<br />

BERBERIAN AND KING 211<br />

The Hormoz Salt was deposited in basins on the<br />

peneplaned Arabian shield during Late Precambrian-<br />

Early Cambrian time. The distribution of these sedimentary<br />

facies suggests that during the Late Precambrian,<br />

Central Iran and Zagros together with the Salt<br />

Ranges of Pakistan and Arabia were all part of the same<br />

landmass and were partly covered by a common shallow<br />

sea (Table 1). The present Main Zagros reverse fault<br />

probably marks the site of a normal fault controlling the<br />

sedimentation (see Fig. 10) and was associated with the<br />

formation of a passive continental margin to the north,<br />

recognizable by the Cambrian (Fig. 3). The Late Precambrian<br />

orogeny (around 850-570 Ma) and its associated<br />

magmatism represent an earlier compressional<br />

phase much before the Hormoz Salt deposition. The<br />

Upper Precambrian acid and basic alkali-volcanics<br />

(Figs. 3 and 10) are subsequent to the Late Precambrian<br />

orogeny and presumably developed during the rifting<br />

that formed the sedimentary basins in which the Hormoz<br />

Salt and the Upper Precambrian - Lower Cambrian<br />

sediments were deposited, and may be associated with<br />

this rifting.<br />

1.2--PALEOZOIC<br />

The first recognizable tectonic event in Iran occurred<br />

near the end of the Paleozoic Era, with the onset of the<br />

Late Paleozoic (Hercynian) orogeny. Prior to this time,<br />

the whole region was a relatively stable continental platform<br />

with epicontinental shelf deposits, and lacked<br />

major magmatism or folding.<br />

After deposition of the Upper Precambrian Hormoz<br />

Salt-dolomite, shallow-water red arkosic sandstones<br />

and shales of Cambrian age were deposited over a wide<br />

area from Arabia in the south to the Alborz mountains<br />

in the north. These deposits also occur in Pakistan,<br />

Afghanistan, and Turkey (Fig. 3; Table 1; Section<br />

II.2a). The red sandstone sedimentation was followed<br />

by the deposition of dolomite, marl, and shale (with salt<br />

pseudomorphs) in shallow sea conditions. The first fully<br />

marine carbonates were deposited in the Middle and<br />

Late Cambrian Epochs, and in the Ordovician or the<br />

Silurian the marine transgression was terminated with<br />

the deposition of sandstone (Table 1).<br />

All of these terrestrial to very shallow marine depositional<br />

environments are consistent with a passive and<br />

continuously connected continental margin at least between<br />

600 and 400 Ma. The fragments of the margin<br />

that we can now identify may not have been in the<br />

positions we suppose in our reconstruction. However,<br />

this would require large strike-slip motion to have occurred<br />

subsequently, for which, as yet, we have no<br />

evidence. During the same period the Asian part of the<br />

Caucasus, south Caspian, and Kopeh Dagh (north of the<br />

Hercynian suture line, not shown in Fig. 3; see Fig. 10)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!