29.01.2015 Views

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BERBERIAN AND KING 243<br />

Cretaceous Khami Group (James and Wynd 1965) were<br />

laid down in a steadily subsiding basin in the Zagros.<br />

The Jurassic carbonate platform extended from the<br />

High-Zagros to northern central Arabia and the climate<br />

seemed to be more humid than previously (Murris<br />

1978). The late Jurassic movements were of minor<br />

tectonic importance, causing slight and short-lived<br />

marine regression of the sea. This regression laid down a<br />

sheet of anhydrite (Hith Anhydrite) from the Arabian<br />

platform to the present foothills of the Zagros, indicating<br />

an arid climate (Murfis 1978). In the interior of the<br />

Zagros basin, near Shiraz, there was more or less<br />

continuous sedimentation during late Jurassic and early<br />

Cretaceous times (James and Wynd 1965; Setudehnia<br />

1978).<br />

As a result of the late Jurassic movements, the whole<br />

western part of Arabia was uplifted and heavily eroded.<br />

Subsequent movements associated with the reactivation<br />

of faults led to the extrusion of basalts in northwest<br />

Arabia until Albian times (Saint-Marc 1978).<br />

II. 5---CRETACEOUS MOVEMENTS<br />

The Cretaceous System was introduced to Iran by<br />

marine transgression over most of the country. In multibranched<br />

rifts, deep-water sediments, diabasic pillow<br />

lava, and continental slope deposits accumulated. Following<br />

the Lower and Middle Cretaceous marine carbonate<br />

deposits, the whole region underwent strong<br />

deformation towards the end of the Cretaceous Period<br />

(Table 2). The Cretaceous movements are divided here<br />

into three phases: the late Neocomian-Albian (118-105<br />

Ma), late Santonian (77 Ma), and late Maastrichtian<br />

Ma). They were associated with episodic imbrication<br />

and ophiolite-radiolarites were emplaced along the<br />

Sevan-Akera (and Vedi) belt in the Little Caucasus, the<br />

High-Zagros-Oman belt, the Central Iranian belts, and<br />

in the Makran region (Figs. 1, 6, and 14). The Iranian<br />

Mesozoic ophiolites have been explained either as remnants<br />

of a large oceanic crust (Pilger 1971; Takin 1972;<br />

Forster et al. 1972; Ricou 1974; Glennie et al. 1974;<br />

Haynes and McQuillan 1974; Stocklin 1974, 1977;<br />

Stoneley 1974, 1975; Lensch et al. 1975; Pilger and<br />

Rosier 1976; Alavi-Tehrani 1975, 1976, 1977; and<br />

Khain 1977, or as narrow intracratonic Red Sea type<br />

rifts (Sabzehei 1974; Nabavi 1976; Beloussov and<br />

Sholpo 1976; Hushmandzadeh 1977). Stoneley (1974)<br />

and Stocklin (1974) emphasized the existence of two<br />

ophiolite-m61ange belts. Stocklin (1977) divided the<br />

Middle Eastern Cretaceous ophiolite-radiolafite belts<br />

into two subbelts: the southern or outer subbelt (the<br />

’High-Zagros-Oman’ ophiolite-radiolarite in this<br />

study) south of the Main Zagros reverse fault line, and<br />

the northern or inner subbelt (the ’Central Iranian’<br />

separated ophiolite-m61ange belts; Figs. 1 and 14).<br />

H.5.1--Lower Cretaceous movements (118-105 Ma<br />

H.5.1a--The Zagros basin<br />

Despite the continuous Jurassic--Cretaceous marine<br />

carbonate sedimentation in Shiraz and northern Khuzestan<br />

area, the Cretaceous sequence of the Zagros covers<br />

the underlying Jurassic sediments (Surmeh, Hith, or<br />

Gotnia Formations) disconformably (the late Jurassic<br />

disconformity) with deposition of the Fahliyan (Neocomian-Aptian)<br />

and Gadvan (Barremian-Aptian)<br />

marine carbonates over the greater part of the Zagros<br />

(Table 2). In Lorestan and northwest Khuzestan,<br />

Lower Cretaceous grey-black radiolaria-bearing shales<br />

and deep-water argillaceous limestone (Garau Formation)<br />

were deposited disconformably over the Jurassic<br />

Gotnia anhydrite. The basin shallows towards Arabia<br />

(Murris 1978). The siltstone, sandstone, and glauconite<br />

found at the upper part of the Fahliyan Formation, and<br />

the strongly iron-stained sandy and glauconitic sediments<br />

on top of the Dariyan Formation indicate a period<br />

of regression, emergence, and erosion at the end of<br />

Aptian time and an ’Aptial-Albian (105 Ma) disconformity’<br />

in the Fars area (James and Wynd 1965;<br />

Setudehnia 1978; see Table 2). A widespread emergence<br />

is reported from Arabia during Albian time, but<br />

was followed by the Cenomanian Wasia (sandstoneshale)<br />

Formation (Powers 1968).<br />

ll.5.1b---Central Iran during Early Cretaceous time<br />

The Lower Cretaceous rocks in Central Iran are<br />

detrital limestone, reef limestone (Aptian Tiz Kuh<br />

Formation, Stocklin 1972), marl, shale (Biabanak<br />

Shale, Stocklin 1972), and volcanics, frequently intermpted<br />

by conglomerates and red beds. Large sedimentary<br />

gaps and unconformities reflect an unstable sedimentary<br />

environment in Central Iran (Table 2).<br />

lI.5.1c--Little Caucasus (northwest Iran) during<br />

Early Cretaceous time<br />

The extensive Jurassic and Cretaceous volcanics in<br />

the Great and Little Caucasus, northwest Iran, show an<br />

apparently subduction related variation of alkalinity.<br />

The K20/Na20 ratio in comparable rocks north of the<br />

Sevan-Akera ophiolite belt (Pontian-Transcaucasian<br />

island arc) also indicates subduction (Adamia et al.<br />

1977). The Sevan-Akera ocean was consumed during<br />

late Neocomian-Albian time (118-105 Ma; Knipper and<br />

Sokolov 1974; Adamia et al. 1977), when northwestern<br />

Shevchenko and Rezanov (1976); Yegorkina et al. (1976); Berberian (1976a,b); Huber (1978); Saint-Marc (1978);<br />

Setudehnia (1978); Afshar-Harb (1979); Berberian and Berberian (1980); Berberian (1981); and all available data<br />

the Geological and Mineral Survey of Iran to 1980. Lambert Conformal Conic Projection.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!