29.01.2015 Views

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

PDF COPY - Manuel berberian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

subject to progressive subsidence and uniform thick<br />

shallow marine sedimentation (Table 2). There are very<br />

striking simple linear facies boundaries parallel to the<br />

old continental margin (Figs. 5 and 14). These were<br />

presumably normal faults formed during extensional<br />

movement at that time.<br />

In the north the sedimentary environment was more<br />

complex, with rapid facies changes and unstable conditions.<br />

There were large areas of shallow sea and small<br />

Red Sea type oceanic basins (the sites of the Central<br />

Iranian narrow ophiolite belts) with a few small land<br />

areas. Presumably these basins and shallow seas were<br />

associated with fragmentation of continental crust during<br />

the period of movement of the continental mass from<br />

Arabia to Asia (Figs. 4 and 5). There appears to be<br />

evidence on which to base speculation about when and<br />

how the Central Iranian narrow oceanic basins formed.<br />

However, the stratigraphic evidence suggests that the<br />

Central Iranian continental fragments were never widely<br />

separated (Tables 1, 2, and 3; Figs. 10 to 17).<br />

1.3.1--Late Cretaceous orogenic phases<br />

The Late Cretaceous Epoch in Iran is characterized by<br />

two episodes of ophiolite emplacement. The emplacement<br />

dates and the associated change of sedimentary<br />

conditions from oceanic to shallow marine are critical,<br />

since they determine the time of ocean closure. Detailed<br />

arguments outlined in Sections II.5.2b and II.5.3b constrain<br />

the dates of these changes together with the High-<br />

Zagros and the Central Iranian ophiolite emplacement to<br />

be nominally around 75 Ma and 65 Ma (Fig. 6; Table 2).<br />

The latter phase was associated with regional metamorphism,<br />

magmatism, and extensive folding and uplift<br />

throughout the country and is taken here to represent the<br />

final closure of the High-Zagros Alpine Ocean. The<br />

’High-Zagros-Oman ophiolite-radiolarite belt,’ which<br />

was emplaced in the form of a thrust stack around 75<br />

Ma, is apparently the remnant of the High-Zagros Alpine<br />

Ocean extending from southeastern Turkey via<br />

High-Zagros to Oman. The ’Central Iranian ophiolitemtlange<br />

belts’ were emplaced around 65 Ma and resulted<br />

from the subsequent closure of the ’small ocean<br />

basins’ created by fragmentation after the separation of<br />

Iran from Arabia. They form a complex system in the<br />

country (Fig. 6). The ’Makran ophiolite-mtlange’<br />

southeastern Iran (Figs. 1, 6, and 14) is not interpretable<br />

as a continental closure, since subduction of ocean crust<br />

BERBERIAN AND ~NG 217<br />

preceded and succeeded its emplacement. It may be<br />

speculated that it was associated with the collision of an<br />

island arc of the eastern High-Zagros Alpine Ocean.<br />

The Sevan-Akera and Vedi ophiolite belts of the Little<br />

Caucasus, which were emplaced around 118-105 Ma,<br />

were the remnants of the western part of the Hercynian<br />

Ocean in the northwest, and presumably were emplaced<br />

during the collision between northwestern Iran and the<br />

Caucasus (see Section 11.5. lc).<br />

The Central Iranian ophiolite-mtlange belts are associated<br />

with glaucophane-schist metamorphism (along<br />

the belt north of the Zagros fault line and in Makran),<br />

and simultaneously the active Central Iranian continental<br />

margin (the Sanandaj-Sirjan belt) was affected by<br />

greenschist metamorphic overprint (see Section<br />

II.5.3b; Figs. 6 and 14). Extensive magmatism<br />

not<br />

found associated with the closure of the internal ocean<br />

basins. This could be because the volcanism is concealed<br />

by later sediments, or because the area of ocean<br />

crust consumed was too small to allow significant volcanic<br />

arcs to become established. The second explanation<br />

is a plausible confirmation of the view that the<br />

internal ophiolites do not represent the remains of the<br />

large ocean basins.<br />

We take the Late Cretaceous events to represent the<br />

disappearance of the oceanic crust between Asia and<br />

Arabia. From this period to the present, all continued<br />

convergence of these plates apparently has been accommodated<br />

by processes that have progressively thickened<br />

and shortened the continental crust and caused its gradual<br />

emergence (Figs. 7 to 9). The compression has<br />

been accompanied by extensive volcanism and various<br />

tectonic episodes, but none have the characteristic of a<br />

closure episode and no ophiolites and pelagic sediments<br />

have been emplaced later than 55 Ma.<br />

1.4----MIDDLE AND LATE ALPIN EVENTS<br />

The Middle Alpine orogenic events started at the<br />

close of the Late Cretaceous movements (65 Ma) and<br />

ended at about 20 Ma. The Late Cretaceous movements<br />

created the main structural features of present-day Iran<br />

(Figs. 6 and 7). During the closure of the High-Zagros<br />

Alpine Ocean in the south, acid plutonic activity took<br />

place in Late Jurassic time (140 Ma) along the southern<br />

margin of Central Iran (the Sanandaj-Sirjan belt; Figs.<br />

and 14). Later plutonic activity and deformation in the<br />

volcanics and the comagmatic alkali granites apparently are the products of post-orogenic rifting. 8. Approximate boundary<br />

between different sedimentary facies. 9. Basement faults (N: Najd left-lateral fault system in Saudi Arabia; Z: Main Zagros and<br />

High-Zagros reverse fault system in Iran; and C: Chapedony fault delineating the western part of a possible Precambrian island<br />

arc in the eastern part of Central Iran). 10. Present continental shorelines.<br />

Principal sources of data: Reconstruction (Mercat6r Projection) is modified from Smith et al. (1973). The Iranian<br />

tectono-sedimentary data are based on our Fig. 10. Data outside Iran come from Abu-Bar and Jackson (1964), Wolfart (1967),<br />

Ketin (1966), Gas and Gibson (1969), Brown (1972), et al. (1974),and Frisch and A1-Shanti (1977).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!