29.01.2015 Views

FoxHershockMappingCommunities

FoxHershockMappingCommunities

FoxHershockMappingCommunities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

many schools, resulting in the closure of the school serving<br />

these two villages. Children must now go to another school<br />

that requires a walk of one to two hours each way. There<br />

was a road connecting these two villages to the main road<br />

running to Luchun County Seat before 1998, but it was cut<br />

off because of floods. They have tried two times to construct<br />

new roads, but all were destroyed again. There has thus<br />

been no connection to the main road from the villages.<br />

Villagers must carry their own products to and from the<br />

market by themselves or with animal power. It takes about<br />

one hour to climb down to Shang Shapu Village, and two<br />

hours to climb down to Xia Shapu Village; however it takes<br />

twice as long when climbing up since the paths are very<br />

steep and curved. Villagers also need more time when they<br />

carry something.<br />

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY<br />

The evaluation group conducted two field studies during<br />

September 2003 (six days) and November 2003 (eight days).<br />

The first field trip focused on evaluating the mapping<br />

processes taken by the MIGIS group. We organized two<br />

group meetings and interviewed about ten key informants<br />

from each village. The second field trip evaluated the<br />

impacts of the MIGIS initiative. We organized three group<br />

meetings and interviewed the same villagers we interviewed<br />

during the first trip. The evaluation employed different<br />

methods, in particular semi-structured group meetings and<br />

key informants' interviewing.<br />

Secondary data gathering and analysis<br />

The evaluation group visited different organizations based in<br />

Kunming that have used PRA for indicator formulation and<br />

data collection for many SIT mapping activities. These<br />

included the Center for Biodiversity and Indigenous<br />

Knowledge (CBIK), the Yunnan Institute of Geography,<br />

Southwest Forestry College, the ICRAF Kunming Office, and<br />

the Great Nature Conservancy (TNC). We collected<br />

information on major activities regarding SIT mapping for<br />

each organization and discussed procedures taken by each<br />

working group, gaining much from the discussions. We also<br />

consulted with these organizations about our evaluation. We<br />

also gathered many relevant documents and papers from<br />

these organizations.<br />

The evaluation group spent almost two days learning from<br />

the MIGIS that group members, especially Dr. Cai Kui and<br />

Dr. Ma Huangcheng. We discussed the objectives and<br />

methodologies as well as the major findings for and from<br />

this initiative. We also collected their maps and listened to<br />

their interesting stories from the mapping period.<br />

The evaluation group then spent almost one week reviewing<br />

these documents and papers. This was a learning process for<br />

the evaluation group helped us in several ways: (1) let us<br />

understand better both the advantages and disadvantages of<br />

linking PRA with conventional GIS technology and involving<br />

local communities in the mapping processes actively; (2)<br />

helped us prepare more appropriate and relevant questions<br />

for the field studies; and (3) allowed us to enlarge some of<br />

the maps made by the MIGIS group which were very helpful<br />

in discussing and sharing information with villagers.<br />

Map reading and information verification<br />

The evaluation group enlarged twenty-two maps and charts<br />

that were made by the MIGIS group in 1999, including<br />

community maps, resource maps, venn diagrams, a land-use<br />

map for 1990, a land-use map for 1999, a historic transect<br />

map, food grain shortage charts, and seasonal calendar<br />

charts for farming, animal husbandry, and household<br />

economic security.<br />

The group showed these maps and charts either at the<br />

beginning or during the process of group meetings or<br />

individual interviews and asked villagers to provide what<br />

information they could, for instance, the location of their<br />

own homestead or where the well is located. The results<br />

indicate that, for the simple maps and charts such as<br />

community maps and food grain shortage charts, villagers<br />

who participated in the mapping process could very easily<br />

read and interpret the major information on the maps.<br />

Villagers who did not participate in the mapping process<br />

might also be able to read and interpret the maps with help<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!