Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DAR File <strong>No</strong>. 33647<br />
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES<br />
An agency head shall dismiss or demote a career service<br />
employee only in accordance with Subsection 67-19-18(5) and<br />
Section R477-<strong>11</strong>-2.<br />
(5) If agency management determines that a career<br />
service employee endangers or threatens the peace and safety of<br />
others or poses a grave threat to the public service or is charged<br />
with aggravated or repeated misconduct, the agency may impose the<br />
following actions, under Subsection 67-19-18(4), pending an<br />
investigation and determination of facts:<br />
(a) paid administrative leave; or<br />
(b) temporary reassignment to another position or work<br />
location at the same current actual wage.<br />
(6) At the time disciplinary action is imposed, the<br />
employee shall be notified in writing of the discipline, the reasons<br />
for the discipline, the effective date and length of the discipline.<br />
(7) Disciplinary actions are subject to the grievance and<br />
appeals procedure by law for career service employees only. The<br />
employee and the agency representative may agree in writing to<br />
waive or extend any grievance step, or the time limits specified for<br />
any grievance step.<br />
KEY: discipline of employees, dismissal of employees,<br />
grievances, <strong>gov</strong>ernment hearings<br />
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
<strong>No</strong>tice of Continuation: June 9, 2007<br />
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 67-19-6;<br />
67-19-18; 63G-2-3<br />
33627<br />
Human Services, Recovery Services<br />
R527-2<strong>01</strong><br />
Medical Support Services<br />
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE<br />
(Amendment)<br />
DAR FILE NO.: 33627<br />
FILED: 05/10/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
RULE ANALYSIS<br />
PURPOSE OF THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE<br />
CHANGE: To clarify how the Office of Recovery Services will<br />
designate in administrative orders which parent's health,<br />
hospital, or dental insurance plan is primary and which<br />
parent's health, hospital, or dental insurance plan is<br />
secondary in accordance with Sections 30-3-5 and 30-3.5.5.<br />
This provision will take effect if, at any time, a dependent child<br />
is covered by both parents' health, hospital, or dental<br />
insurance plans.<br />
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This change adds<br />
a new section, R527-2<strong>01</strong>-10, Coordination of Health<br />
Insurance Benefits, which clarifies that the parent whose<br />
birthday occurs first in the calendar year will carry the primary<br />
insurance coverage for the child, if at any time a dependent<br />
child is covered by both parents' health, hospital, or dental<br />
insurance plans. Also, adding the law reference for Sections<br />
30-3-5 and 30-3-5.5 to the Authorizing, and Implemented or<br />
Interpreted Law section.<br />
STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR<br />
THIS RULE: 45 CFR 303.30 and 45 CFR 303.31 and 45<br />
CFR 303.32 and Section 62A-1-<strong>11</strong>1 and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-107<br />
and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326 and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326.1 and<br />
Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326.2 and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326.3 and Section<br />
63G-4-102 et seq. and Section 78B-12-212 and Subsection<br />
35A-7-105(2) and Subsection 62A-<strong>11</strong>-103(2) and Subsection<br />
62A-<strong>11</strong>-4<strong>06</strong>(9) and Subsection 78B-12-102(6)<br />
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:<br />
♦ THE STATE BUDGET: There are no anticipated costs or<br />
saving to the state because the changes to the rule affect<br />
documents that are already being generated for other<br />
reasons. The office has been and is still required to provide<br />
the same services pursuant to federal regulations and state<br />
law.<br />
♦ LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: <strong>Administrative</strong> rules of the Office<br />
of Recovery Services/Child Support Services (ORS/CSS) do<br />
not apply to local <strong>gov</strong>ernment; therefore, there are no<br />
anticipated costs or savings for any local businesses due to<br />
this amendment.<br />
♦ SMALL BUSINESSES: There are no anticipated costs or<br />
savings to small businesses because the changes to the rule<br />
do not affect the ways that employers administer insurance<br />
policies. The changes to the rule are consistent with the way<br />
insurance companies currently determine the primary<br />
insurance carrier when/if both parents provide health,<br />
hospital, or dental insurance for the child.<br />
♦ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES,<br />
BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES:<br />
There are no anticipated costs or savings to other persons<br />
because the changes to the rule are consistent with the way<br />
insurance companies currently determine the primary<br />
insurance carrier when/if both parents provide health,<br />
hospital, or dental insurance for the child.<br />
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There<br />
are no anticipated costs or savings to affected persons<br />
because the changes to the rule do not affect the way that the<br />
Office of Recovery Services does business. The changes to<br />
the rule only designate which parent's insurance will be<br />
designated in administrative orders issued by the Office of<br />
Recovery Services as the primary coverage when/if both<br />
parents provide heath, hospital, or dental insurance for a<br />
minor child. The designation is consistent with the way<br />
insurance companies currently determine the primary<br />
insurance carrier.<br />
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE<br />
FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES:<br />
There are no anticipated costs or savings to affected persons<br />
because the changes to the rule do not affect the way that<br />
employers administer insurance policies. The changes to the<br />
rule only designate which parent's insurance will be<br />
UTAH STATE BULLETIN, June <strong>01</strong>, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>3