30.01.2015 Views

Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov

Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov

Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DAR File <strong>No</strong>. 33647<br />

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES<br />

An agency head shall dismiss or demote a career service<br />

employee only in accordance with Subsection 67-19-18(5) and<br />

Section R477-<strong>11</strong>-2.<br />

(5) If agency management determines that a career<br />

service employee endangers or threatens the peace and safety of<br />

others or poses a grave threat to the public service or is charged<br />

with aggravated or repeated misconduct, the agency may impose the<br />

following actions, under Subsection 67-19-18(4), pending an<br />

investigation and determination of facts:<br />

(a) paid administrative leave; or<br />

(b) temporary reassignment to another position or work<br />

location at the same current actual wage.<br />

(6) At the time disciplinary action is imposed, the<br />

employee shall be notified in writing of the discipline, the reasons<br />

for the discipline, the effective date and length of the discipline.<br />

(7) Disciplinary actions are subject to the grievance and<br />

appeals procedure by law for career service employees only. The<br />

employee and the agency representative may agree in writing to<br />

waive or extend any grievance step, or the time limits specified for<br />

any grievance step.<br />

KEY: discipline of employees, dismissal of employees,<br />

grievances, <strong>gov</strong>ernment hearings<br />

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />

<strong>No</strong>tice of Continuation: June 9, 2007<br />

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 67-19-6;<br />

67-19-18; 63G-2-3<br />

33627<br />

Human Services, Recovery Services<br />

R527-2<strong>01</strong><br />

Medical Support Services<br />

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE<br />

(Amendment)<br />

DAR FILE NO.: 33627<br />

FILED: 05/10/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />

RULE ANALYSIS<br />

PURPOSE OF THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE<br />

CHANGE: To clarify how the Office of Recovery Services will<br />

designate in administrative orders which parent's health,<br />

hospital, or dental insurance plan is primary and which<br />

parent's health, hospital, or dental insurance plan is<br />

secondary in accordance with Sections 30-3-5 and 30-3.5.5.<br />

This provision will take effect if, at any time, a dependent child<br />

is covered by both parents' health, hospital, or dental<br />

insurance plans.<br />

SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This change adds<br />

a new section, R527-2<strong>01</strong>-10, Coordination of Health<br />

Insurance Benefits, which clarifies that the parent whose<br />

birthday occurs first in the calendar year will carry the primary<br />

insurance coverage for the child, if at any time a dependent<br />

child is covered by both parents' health, hospital, or dental<br />

insurance plans. Also, adding the law reference for Sections<br />

30-3-5 and 30-3-5.5 to the Authorizing, and Implemented or<br />

Interpreted Law section.<br />

STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR<br />

THIS RULE: 45 CFR 303.30 and 45 CFR 303.31 and 45<br />

CFR 303.32 and Section 62A-1-<strong>11</strong>1 and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-107<br />

and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326 and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326.1 and<br />

Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326.2 and Section 62A-<strong>11</strong>-326.3 and Section<br />

63G-4-102 et seq. and Section 78B-12-212 and Subsection<br />

35A-7-105(2) and Subsection 62A-<strong>11</strong>-103(2) and Subsection<br />

62A-<strong>11</strong>-4<strong>06</strong>(9) and Subsection 78B-12-102(6)<br />

ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:<br />

♦ THE STATE BUDGET: There are no anticipated costs or<br />

saving to the state because the changes to the rule affect<br />

documents that are already being generated for other<br />

reasons. The office has been and is still required to provide<br />

the same services pursuant to federal regulations and state<br />

law.<br />

♦ LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: <strong>Administrative</strong> rules of the Office<br />

of Recovery Services/Child Support Services (ORS/CSS) do<br />

not apply to local <strong>gov</strong>ernment; therefore, there are no<br />

anticipated costs or savings for any local businesses due to<br />

this amendment.<br />

♦ SMALL BUSINESSES: There are no anticipated costs or<br />

savings to small businesses because the changes to the rule<br />

do not affect the ways that employers administer insurance<br />

policies. The changes to the rule are consistent with the way<br />

insurance companies currently determine the primary<br />

insurance carrier when/if both parents provide health,<br />

hospital, or dental insurance for the child.<br />

♦ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES,<br />

BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES:<br />

There are no anticipated costs or savings to other persons<br />

because the changes to the rule are consistent with the way<br />

insurance companies currently determine the primary<br />

insurance carrier when/if both parents provide health,<br />

hospital, or dental insurance for the child.<br />

COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There<br />

are no anticipated costs or savings to affected persons<br />

because the changes to the rule do not affect the way that the<br />

Office of Recovery Services does business. The changes to<br />

the rule only designate which parent's insurance will be<br />

designated in administrative orders issued by the Office of<br />

Recovery Services as the primary coverage when/if both<br />

parents provide heath, hospital, or dental insurance for a<br />

minor child. The designation is consistent with the way<br />

insurance companies currently determine the primary<br />

insurance carrier.<br />

COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE<br />

FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES:<br />

There are no anticipated costs or savings to affected persons<br />

because the changes to the rule do not affect the way that<br />

employers administer insurance policies. The changes to the<br />

rule only designate which parent's insurance will be<br />

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, June <strong>01</strong>, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. <strong>11</strong> <strong>11</strong>3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!