Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES DAR File <strong>No</strong>. 33639<br />
unnecessary. This is done in Subsections R156-46b-2<strong>01</strong>(1)<br />
and R156-46b-202(1). It should be noted that a companion<br />
rule filing that includes revisions to Section R156-1-109<br />
makes correlating changes to the designation of presiding<br />
officer to address the changes to the designation of<br />
adjudicative proceedings made by this rule filing. Finally, this<br />
filing makes other cleanup and technical changes including<br />
capitalizing the word "Division" consistently throughout the<br />
rule and deleting the reference to a private reprimand in<br />
Section R156-46b-202. (DAR NOTE: The proposed<br />
amendment to Rule R156-1 is under DAR <strong>No</strong>. 33641 in this<br />
issue, June 1, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, of the Bulletin.)<br />
STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR<br />
THIS RULE: Subsection 58-1-1<strong>06</strong>(1)(a) and Subsection<br />
63G-4-102(6)<br />
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:<br />
♦ THE STATE BUDGET: The Division does not anticipate any<br />
increased costs as a result of the proposed amendments.<br />
The changes will allow the Division to more efficiently handle<br />
these types of cases in an informal setting without<br />
unnecessarily devoting resources to formal proceedings. The<br />
savings allow the Division to more efficiently handle its<br />
increasing workload without requiring additional resources as<br />
soon as would otherwise be required or without reducing the<br />
level of service provided. The changes necessitated by the<br />
<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> Legislature addressed in this filing do not result in any<br />
additional impacts.<br />
♦ LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed amendments only<br />
apply to adjudicative proceedings in the Division with respect<br />
to contractors and Lien Recovery Fund claims. As a result,<br />
the proposed amendments do not apply to local<br />
<strong>gov</strong>ernments.<br />
♦ SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendments only<br />
apply to adjudicative proceedings in the Division with respect<br />
to contractors and Lien Recovery Fund claims. Contractors<br />
and companies who file a Lien Recovery Fund claim may<br />
qualify as a small business; however, these proposed<br />
amendments would not directly affect the business.<br />
♦ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES,<br />
BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES:<br />
The proposed amendments will not result in any additional<br />
costs or savings to licensees with regard to the change in<br />
classification of contractor adjudicative proceedings. Since<br />
most cases are currently resolved by informal means, those<br />
licensees will not be affected. For the more controversial<br />
cases, the overall expense to the licensee is not expected to<br />
change significantly. The changes necessitated by the <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
Legislature addressed in this filing do not result in any<br />
additional impacts.<br />
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The<br />
proposed amendments will not result in any additional costs<br />
or savings to licensees with regard to the change in<br />
classification of contractor adjudicative proceedings. Since<br />
most cases are currently resolved by informal means, those<br />
licensees will not be affected. For the more controversial<br />
cases, the overall expense to the licensee is not expected to<br />
change significantly. The changes necessitated by the <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
Legislature addressed in this filing do not result in any<br />
additional impacts.<br />
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE<br />
FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES:<br />
It is not expected that there will be a cost increase to the<br />
contractor industry as a result of the changes in the<br />
designation of adjudicative proceedings, as experience has<br />
shown that such cases are able to be resolved informally. <strong>No</strong><br />
fiscal impact to other businesses is anticipated by such<br />
change of procedures.<br />
THE FULL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECTED,<br />
DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT:<br />
COMMERCE<br />
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL<br />
LICENSING<br />
HEBER M WELLS BLDG<br />
160 E 300 S<br />
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84<strong>11</strong>1-2316<br />
or at the Division of <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>.<br />
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:<br />
♦ Dan Jones by phone at 8<strong>01</strong>-530-6720, by FAX at<br />
8<strong>01</strong>-530-65<strong>11</strong>, or by Internet E-mail at dansjones@utah.<strong>gov</strong><br />
♦ Dane Ishihara by phone at 8<strong>01</strong>-530-7632, by FAX at<br />
8<strong>01</strong>-530-65<strong>11</strong>, or by Internet E-mail at dishihara@utah.<strong>gov</strong><br />
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON<br />
THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO<br />
LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/<strong>01</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC<br />
HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:<br />
♦ <strong>06</strong>/30/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S,<br />
Conference Room 474, Salt Lake City, UT<br />
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/08/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
AUTHORIZED BY: Mark Steinagel, Director<br />
R156. Commerce, Occupational and Professional Licensing.<br />
R156-46b. Division <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Administrative</strong> Procedures Act Rule.<br />
R156-46b-103. Authority - Purpose.<br />
This rule is adopted by the [d]Division under the authority<br />
of Title 63G, Chapter 4, Subsection 58-1-108(1), and Subsection<br />
58-1-1<strong>06</strong>(1)(a). The purposes of this rule include:<br />
(a) classifying [d]Division adjudicative proceedings;<br />
(b) clarifying the identity of presiding officers at<br />
[d]Division adjudicative proceedings; and<br />
(c) defining procedures for [d]Division adjudicative<br />
proceedings which are consistent with the requirements of Titles 58<br />
and 63G and Rule R151-46b.<br />
92 UTAH STATE BULLETIN, June <strong>01</strong>, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. <strong>11</strong>