30.01.2015 Views

Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov

Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov

Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES DAR File <strong>No</strong>. 33639<br />

unnecessary. This is done in Subsections R156-46b-2<strong>01</strong>(1)<br />

and R156-46b-202(1). It should be noted that a companion<br />

rule filing that includes revisions to Section R156-1-109<br />

makes correlating changes to the designation of presiding<br />

officer to address the changes to the designation of<br />

adjudicative proceedings made by this rule filing. Finally, this<br />

filing makes other cleanup and technical changes including<br />

capitalizing the word "Division" consistently throughout the<br />

rule and deleting the reference to a private reprimand in<br />

Section R156-46b-202. (DAR NOTE: The proposed<br />

amendment to Rule R156-1 is under DAR <strong>No</strong>. 33641 in this<br />

issue, June 1, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, of the Bulletin.)<br />

STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR<br />

THIS RULE: Subsection 58-1-1<strong>06</strong>(1)(a) and Subsection<br />

63G-4-102(6)<br />

ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:<br />

♦ THE STATE BUDGET: The Division does not anticipate any<br />

increased costs as a result of the proposed amendments.<br />

The changes will allow the Division to more efficiently handle<br />

these types of cases in an informal setting without<br />

unnecessarily devoting resources to formal proceedings. The<br />

savings allow the Division to more efficiently handle its<br />

increasing workload without requiring additional resources as<br />

soon as would otherwise be required or without reducing the<br />

level of service provided. The changes necessitated by the<br />

<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> Legislature addressed in this filing do not result in any<br />

additional impacts.<br />

♦ LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed amendments only<br />

apply to adjudicative proceedings in the Division with respect<br />

to contractors and Lien Recovery Fund claims. As a result,<br />

the proposed amendments do not apply to local<br />

<strong>gov</strong>ernments.<br />

♦ SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendments only<br />

apply to adjudicative proceedings in the Division with respect<br />

to contractors and Lien Recovery Fund claims. Contractors<br />

and companies who file a Lien Recovery Fund claim may<br />

qualify as a small business; however, these proposed<br />

amendments would not directly affect the business.<br />

♦ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES,<br />

BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES:<br />

The proposed amendments will not result in any additional<br />

costs or savings to licensees with regard to the change in<br />

classification of contractor adjudicative proceedings. Since<br />

most cases are currently resolved by informal means, those<br />

licensees will not be affected. For the more controversial<br />

cases, the overall expense to the licensee is not expected to<br />

change significantly. The changes necessitated by the <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />

Legislature addressed in this filing do not result in any<br />

additional impacts.<br />

COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The<br />

proposed amendments will not result in any additional costs<br />

or savings to licensees with regard to the change in<br />

classification of contractor adjudicative proceedings. Since<br />

most cases are currently resolved by informal means, those<br />

licensees will not be affected. For the more controversial<br />

cases, the overall expense to the licensee is not expected to<br />

change significantly. The changes necessitated by the <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />

Legislature addressed in this filing do not result in any<br />

additional impacts.<br />

COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE<br />

FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES:<br />

It is not expected that there will be a cost increase to the<br />

contractor industry as a result of the changes in the<br />

designation of adjudicative proceedings, as experience has<br />

shown that such cases are able to be resolved informally. <strong>No</strong><br />

fiscal impact to other businesses is anticipated by such<br />

change of procedures.<br />

THE FULL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECTED,<br />

DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT:<br />

COMMERCE<br />

OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL<br />

LICENSING<br />

HEBER M WELLS BLDG<br />

160 E 300 S<br />

SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84<strong>11</strong>1-2316<br />

or at the Division of <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>.<br />

DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:<br />

♦ Dan Jones by phone at 8<strong>01</strong>-530-6720, by FAX at<br />

8<strong>01</strong>-530-65<strong>11</strong>, or by Internet E-mail at dansjones@utah.<strong>gov</strong><br />

♦ Dane Ishihara by phone at 8<strong>01</strong>-530-7632, by FAX at<br />

8<strong>01</strong>-530-65<strong>11</strong>, or by Internet E-mail at dishihara@utah.<strong>gov</strong><br />

INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON<br />

THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO<br />

LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/<strong>01</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />

INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC<br />

HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:<br />

♦ <strong>06</strong>/30/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S,<br />

Conference Room 474, Salt Lake City, UT<br />

THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/08/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />

AUTHORIZED BY: Mark Steinagel, Director<br />

R156. Commerce, Occupational and Professional Licensing.<br />

R156-46b. Division <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Administrative</strong> Procedures Act Rule.<br />

R156-46b-103. Authority - Purpose.<br />

This rule is adopted by the [d]Division under the authority<br />

of Title 63G, Chapter 4, Subsection 58-1-108(1), and Subsection<br />

58-1-1<strong>06</strong>(1)(a). The purposes of this rule include:<br />

(a) classifying [d]Division adjudicative proceedings;<br />

(b) clarifying the identity of presiding officers at<br />

[d]Division adjudicative proceedings; and<br />

(c) defining procedures for [d]Division adjudicative<br />

proceedings which are consistent with the requirements of Titles 58<br />

and 63G and Rule R151-46b.<br />

92 UTAH STATE BULLETIN, June <strong>01</strong>, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. <strong>11</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!