Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Vol. 2010, No. 11 (06/01/2010) PDF - Administrative Rules - Utah.gov
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES DAR File <strong>No</strong>. 33641<br />
requirement that the renewal notices specify the renewal<br />
requirements with a provision that the renewal requirements<br />
be outlined in the online renewal process, and that each<br />
licensee much document or certify that they meet the<br />
requirements prior to renewal. Finally it allows for sending<br />
renewal notices by email in the future. Sixth, this filing<br />
revises the provisions <strong>gov</strong>erning reinstatement of licensure to<br />
eliminate a reinstatement fee for applicants applying for<br />
licensure more than two years after the expiration of their<br />
license. Applicants who have not been practicing without a<br />
license after the expiration of their license will only pay the<br />
application fee for a new applicant rather than a<br />
reinstatement fee and a renewal fee. This change better<br />
follows the intent of the statute and encompasses the<br />
Division's current policy choice and process. Finally, this filing<br />
makes cleanup and technical changes including capitalizing<br />
the word "Division" consistently throughout the rule and<br />
making other cleanup and technical changes. (DAR NOTE:<br />
H.B. 89 (<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>) is found at Chapter 240, Laws of <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>,<br />
and was effective 05/<strong>11</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>. H.B. <strong>11</strong> (<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>) is found at<br />
Chapter 227, Laws of <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, and was effective<br />
05/<strong>11</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>. S.B. 274 (<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>) is found at Chapter 180, Laws<br />
of <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, and was effective 05/<strong>11</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>. S.B. 90 (<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>)<br />
is found at Chapter 214, Laws of <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, and was<br />
effective 05/<strong>11</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>. H.B. 232 (<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>) is found at Chapter<br />
127, Laws of <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, and was effective 05/<strong>11</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>.)<br />
STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR<br />
THIS RULE: Section 58-1-308 and Subsection 58-1-1<strong>06</strong>(1)<br />
(a) and Subsection 58-1-5<strong>01</strong>(4)<br />
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:<br />
♦ THE STATE BUDGET: The proposed changes for<br />
contractor and lien recovery fund adjudicative proceedings<br />
will allow the Division to more efficiently handle these types of<br />
cases in an informal setting without unnecessarily devoting<br />
resources to formal proceedings. This savings allows the<br />
Division to more efficiently handle its increasing workload<br />
without requiring additional resources as soon as would<br />
otherwise be required or without reducing the level of service<br />
provided. These savings cannot be quantified. Changes to<br />
the renewal section will clarify the process for online renewals<br />
and allow for future use of email. The use of email will allow<br />
potential future mailing cost savings. These savings cannot<br />
be quantified. Taking out the reinstatement fee of $50 on top<br />
of the new application fee for licensees who file for a<br />
reinstatement over 2 years may result in a small decrease in<br />
state revenue. This change cannot be quantified as the<br />
Division is unable to determine how many licensees in the<br />
future will apply for reinstatement of licensure after their<br />
license has been expired for over two years. The changes<br />
necessitated by the <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> Legislature addressed in this filing<br />
do not result in any additional impacts beyond what was<br />
addressed by the Legislature.<br />
♦ LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed amendments only<br />
apply to licensed professions and occupations regulated by<br />
the Division and applicants for licensure in those professions<br />
and occupations. As a result, the proposed amendments do<br />
not apply to local <strong>gov</strong>ernments.<br />
♦ SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendments only<br />
apply to licensed professions and occupations regulated by<br />
the Division and applicants for licensure in those professions<br />
and occupations. Licensees and applicants for licensure may<br />
work in a small business; however, the proposed<br />
amendments would not directly affect the business.<br />
♦ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES,<br />
BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES:<br />
The elimination of the reinstatement fee for licensees<br />
applying for reinstatement of licensure after their license has<br />
been expired for 2 years will result in savings of the $50<br />
reinstatement fee. The Division is unable to determine how<br />
many licensees in the future will apply for reinstatement of<br />
licensure after their license has been expired for over two<br />
years.<br />
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The<br />
proposed amendments will not result in any additional costs<br />
or savings to licensees with regard to the change in<br />
classification of contractor and lien recovery fund adjudicative<br />
proceedings. Since most cases are currently resolved by<br />
informal means, those licensees will not be affected. For the<br />
more controversial cases, the overall expense to the licensee<br />
is not expected to change significantly. The changes<br />
necessitated by the <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> Legislature addressed in this filing<br />
do not result in any additional impacts.<br />
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE<br />
FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES:<br />
It is not expected that there will be a cost increase to the<br />
contractor industry as a result of the changes in the<br />
designation of adjudicative proceedings, as experience has<br />
shown that such cases are able to be resolved informally. A<br />
cost savings may result to licensees from the elimination of a<br />
reinstatement fee. As more fully discussed in the rule<br />
summary, no fiscal impact to other businesses is anticipated.<br />
THE FULL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECTED,<br />
DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT:<br />
COMMERCE<br />
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL<br />
LICENSING<br />
HEBER M WELLS BLDG<br />
160 E 300 S<br />
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84<strong>11</strong>1-2316<br />
or at the Division of <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>.<br />
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:<br />
♦ W. Ray Walker by phone at 8<strong>01</strong>-530-6256, by FAX at<br />
8<strong>01</strong>-530-65<strong>11</strong>, or by Internet E-mail at raywalker@utah.<strong>gov</strong><br />
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON<br />
THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO<br />
LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/<strong>01</strong>/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong><br />
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC<br />
HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:<br />
♦ <strong>06</strong>/30/<strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong> 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S,<br />
Conference Room 474, Salt Lake City, UT<br />
50 UTAH STATE BULLETIN, June <strong>01</strong>, <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>2<strong>01</strong>0</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. <strong>11</strong>