30.01.2015 Views

Year 2025 Transportation Master Plan Update - City of Oviedo

Year 2025 Transportation Master Plan Update - City of Oviedo

Year 2025 Transportation Master Plan Update - City of Oviedo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2.2 Alternative 1 – Additional Supply<br />

Alternative 1 is based on widening existing roadways to accommodate future traffic and<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> eight roadway widening projects as indicated on Table 4-1. These eight<br />

projects were coded into the future year model and the model was run to project future<br />

traffic volumes for the study area roadway network. Figure D-1 in Appendix D shows<br />

the changes in the model network associated with this alternative.<br />

Table 4-1: Alternative 1 – <strong>Year</strong> <strong>2025</strong> Additional Supply<br />

Project Roadway Improvement From To<br />

1-1 SR 434 (Alafaya Trail) 8 Lanes E. Mitchell Hammock Road McCulloch Road<br />

1-2 W. McCulloch Road 4 Lanes Rouse Road SR 434 (Alafaya Trail)<br />

1-3 SR 426 6 Lanes SR 417 (Greenway) Winter Springs Blvd<br />

1-4 SR 434 4 Lanes Mitchell Hammock Road SR 417 (Greenway)<br />

1-5 Lockwood Road 6 Lanes Mitchell Hammock Road CR 419 (E Broadway St)<br />

1-6 Snow Hill Road 4 Lanes CR 419 (Chuluota Road) Langford Road<br />

1-7 Mitchell Hammock Road 6 Lanes SR 426 SR 434 (Alafaya Trail)<br />

1-8 CR 426 4 Lanes Lockwood Road Pine Hills Blvd<br />

The model results were converted to AADT and peak hour/peak direction volumes, and<br />

compared to the future capacities based on the future year number <strong>of</strong> lanes in the<br />

alternative. A comparison table located at the end <strong>of</strong> this section, Table 4-2, shows the<br />

resulting future year volumes and peak hour/peak direction LOS for this alternative,<br />

highlighted in blue.<br />

As shown in Table 4-5 there are 17 roadway analysis segments which are projected to<br />

operate deficiently, or worse than their adopted LOS standard, in <strong>2025</strong> with the<br />

proposed widening improvements. Of those 17, 13 are projected to operate at LOS F.<br />

Of those 13, 5 operate worse than LOS F even with improvement. As indicated by the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> this analysis, even with several widening projects, there is still additional<br />

demand in certain corridors <strong>of</strong> the system that is not being met.<br />

For example, despite widening much <strong>of</strong> SR 434 (Alafaya Trail), many <strong>of</strong> the segments in<br />

this corridor still operate in a deficient condition. This is a strong indication <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

demand for north/south roadway capacity in this area.<br />

This alternative focused on directly improving failing corridors by adding capacity where<br />

failures exist. However, increasing capacity on major roads also increases the<br />

attractiveness <strong>of</strong> that road to the automobile driver. Thus, the operating condition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

roadway does not always improve although capacity is increased. This is due to the<br />

increase in demand as seen in this alternative.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> consistency with the guiding principles this Alternative is somewhat weak.<br />

Guiding principle A and B recommend against the creation <strong>of</strong> multi-lane highways and<br />

roads greater than 6 lanes. Alternative 1 is inconsistent with both <strong>of</strong> these<br />

recommendations in that it focuses on creating multiple lane highways where there is<br />

demand regardless <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> lanes. This Alternative is also somewhat inconsistent<br />

with principles C and H, in that it does not contain new connections and encourages<br />

more multi-lane facilities which are frequently not accommodating <strong>of</strong> bicycle and<br />

pedestrian modes. Figure 4-3 shows the deficient roadways included in this Alternative.<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oviedo</strong> 4-5<br />

<strong>Year</strong> <strong>2025</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Update</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!