Year 2025 Transportation Master Plan Update - City of Oviedo
Year 2025 Transportation Master Plan Update - City of Oviedo
Year 2025 Transportation Master Plan Update - City of Oviedo
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.2.2 Alternative 1 – Additional Supply<br />
Alternative 1 is based on widening existing roadways to accommodate future traffic and<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> eight roadway widening projects as indicated on Table 4-1. These eight<br />
projects were coded into the future year model and the model was run to project future<br />
traffic volumes for the study area roadway network. Figure D-1 in Appendix D shows<br />
the changes in the model network associated with this alternative.<br />
Table 4-1: Alternative 1 – <strong>Year</strong> <strong>2025</strong> Additional Supply<br />
Project Roadway Improvement From To<br />
1-1 SR 434 (Alafaya Trail) 8 Lanes E. Mitchell Hammock Road McCulloch Road<br />
1-2 W. McCulloch Road 4 Lanes Rouse Road SR 434 (Alafaya Trail)<br />
1-3 SR 426 6 Lanes SR 417 (Greenway) Winter Springs Blvd<br />
1-4 SR 434 4 Lanes Mitchell Hammock Road SR 417 (Greenway)<br />
1-5 Lockwood Road 6 Lanes Mitchell Hammock Road CR 419 (E Broadway St)<br />
1-6 Snow Hill Road 4 Lanes CR 419 (Chuluota Road) Langford Road<br />
1-7 Mitchell Hammock Road 6 Lanes SR 426 SR 434 (Alafaya Trail)<br />
1-8 CR 426 4 Lanes Lockwood Road Pine Hills Blvd<br />
The model results were converted to AADT and peak hour/peak direction volumes, and<br />
compared to the future capacities based on the future year number <strong>of</strong> lanes in the<br />
alternative. A comparison table located at the end <strong>of</strong> this section, Table 4-2, shows the<br />
resulting future year volumes and peak hour/peak direction LOS for this alternative,<br />
highlighted in blue.<br />
As shown in Table 4-5 there are 17 roadway analysis segments which are projected to<br />
operate deficiently, or worse than their adopted LOS standard, in <strong>2025</strong> with the<br />
proposed widening improvements. Of those 17, 13 are projected to operate at LOS F.<br />
Of those 13, 5 operate worse than LOS F even with improvement. As indicated by the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> this analysis, even with several widening projects, there is still additional<br />
demand in certain corridors <strong>of</strong> the system that is not being met.<br />
For example, despite widening much <strong>of</strong> SR 434 (Alafaya Trail), many <strong>of</strong> the segments in<br />
this corridor still operate in a deficient condition. This is a strong indication <strong>of</strong> additional<br />
demand for north/south roadway capacity in this area.<br />
This alternative focused on directly improving failing corridors by adding capacity where<br />
failures exist. However, increasing capacity on major roads also increases the<br />
attractiveness <strong>of</strong> that road to the automobile driver. Thus, the operating condition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
roadway does not always improve although capacity is increased. This is due to the<br />
increase in demand as seen in this alternative.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> consistency with the guiding principles this Alternative is somewhat weak.<br />
Guiding principle A and B recommend against the creation <strong>of</strong> multi-lane highways and<br />
roads greater than 6 lanes. Alternative 1 is inconsistent with both <strong>of</strong> these<br />
recommendations in that it focuses on creating multiple lane highways where there is<br />
demand regardless <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> lanes. This Alternative is also somewhat inconsistent<br />
with principles C and H, in that it does not contain new connections and encourages<br />
more multi-lane facilities which are frequently not accommodating <strong>of</strong> bicycle and<br />
pedestrian modes. Figure 4-3 shows the deficient roadways included in this Alternative.<br />
<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oviedo</strong> 4-5<br />
<strong>Year</strong> <strong>2025</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Update</strong>