31.01.2015 Views

edgar-mitchell

edgar-mitchell

edgar-mitchell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126<br />

The Way of the Explorer<br />

as a wave. However, since the later Greek thinkers, it was believed to be<br />

corpuscular or particle-like, and from Galileo to Newton onward for three<br />

centuries, the argument persisted. One side or the other would prevail,<br />

but only for a time, as new discoveries were made, lending credence to the<br />

opposing camp. Then by 1880, James Clerk Maxwell and his electromagnetic<br />

theory seemed to definitively settle the issue. His theory claimed that<br />

light was most certainly wavelike. Of course, this too passed.<br />

With the discovery of the photo-electric effect by Philipp von Lenard<br />

in 1902, and the solution to quantized heat radiation by Max Planck, the<br />

pendulous answer again began to swing toward Newton and those who<br />

believed light was a particle. It was Einstein, still an unknown in 1905,<br />

who put the wave and particle ideas together, with the mathematics to<br />

show that light came in little packets of energy, subsequently called photons,<br />

each carrying a quantum of energy proportional to the frequency of<br />

the light. Light, and all radiation, clearly had both wave and particle characteristics.<br />

Einstein had cobbled together concepts previously considered<br />

separate.<br />

A few years later, Louis de Broglie asserted that not only light, but all<br />

matter possessed both wave and particle properties at the subatomic level.<br />

That is to say, he brought into question the fundamental way matter was<br />

believed to exist. Atoms were not like little ping-pong balls after all. This<br />

brought us to the strange new world of quantum physics, an eerie world so<br />

baffling and mysterious that both Einstein and Planck had difficulty accepting<br />

it until the very end of their lives.<br />

The dual nature of matter as both particle and wave is the foundation<br />

of quantum physics; we now call it the wave/particle duality. 1 Since the<br />

days of Newton, waves and particles have been given precisely definable<br />

and measurable attributes, though the definiteness of the attributes of each<br />

are quite different. Particles may be said to have a definite position, mass,<br />

velocity, and spin. Their momentum and energy are attributes that can be<br />

computed. However, waves have no mass, no definite position, nor spin.<br />

Waves can also overlap constructively or destructively (in other words,<br />

coexist at the same location)—matter cannot. But waves do have polarization,<br />

energy proportional to frequency, and a constant velocity (the speed<br />

of light in free space). These different attributes and their measures were<br />

and are a source of consternation to many physicists. How can such different<br />

concepts be brought together<br />

Einstein resolved one critical issue even before the ascension of quantum<br />

theory by postulating that the energy equivalent of matter at rest was<br />

the product of its mass and the velocity of light squared, expressed in his<br />

famous equation, E=MC 2 . This equation helped relate the energy of waves<br />

to that of particles: Energy (waves) equals mass (particles) multiplied by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!