edgar-mitchell

Invisible Realities 139
independent existence in nature. Changing the process during the experiment
causes immediate adaptation by the wave/particles to maintain
nonlocal resonance with all parts of the setup, which are instantly correlated
throughout the experiment. When the wave/particle gives up its
energy to the collector, it ceases to be that wave/particle.
If we apply this idea to the Schrödinger Cat Paradox, what do we have
Replace the cat with a poison-molecule detector—one which records the
molecules’ time of impact. If the detector registers a poison molecule by
the time the probability is 50/50 that the cat is dead, then we can deduce
that the cat would have died. When the experimenter reads the recorder
and discovers the result is irrelevant. Were we to leave the poison-molecule
detector in place and add the cat, a philosopher, or a scientist, the only
difference would be the addition of a wave function representing a conscious,
sentient, quantum entity. The conclusion: flawed because it unequivocally
requires that the state of a quantum object can only be described
as probabilities between measurements (observations). The modern understanding
that all physical objects of every scale size possess quantum
attributes (a quantum hologram) nullifies that earlier interpretation.