DOC request three complete - Cannabis Defense Coalition

FW: 380 200 Community Sppervision of Offenders
Page 4 6f4
Quick Question - Regarding offender supervision, has the content on inactive Administrative Phases A ahd '
B been moved to the CCO manual, or has it.gone away entirely ' .
Please let me know,
Thank youl
From: McKenzie, Jane M. (DOC) On Behalf Of Lindell, Katrina R. (DOC)
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:23 PM
To: Witten, Dell-Autumn W. (DOC); Meusborn-Marsh, Stefani L. (DOC)
Cc:. Lindell, Katrina R. (DOC)
Subject: , FW: 380 200 Community Supervision of Offenders
Autumn, Katrina has reviewed and approved the below policy that has incorporated 380.100. There are
some formatting issues but am not sure if you want me to do that or not. Please let me know. Thanks,
Jane
I,
From: Miller, Merlin K. 'Lin' (DOC)
Sent: Tuesday, February p, 2009 B:S6 AM
To: Lindell, Katrina R. (DOC)
Cc: Meusborn-Marsh, Stefani L. (DOC)
Subject: FW: 3BO 200 Community SupervIsion of Offenders '
Katrina/Stef, a. couple more comments made in red in the attached.
(Stef, I know how you feel about the policy, now just want to it DONE.)
From: Meusborn-Marsh, Stefani L. (DOC)
Sent: FridaY,·February 13, 2009 2:22 PM
To: Lindell, Katrina R. (DOC); Witten, Dell-AutumnW. (DOC); Miller" Merlin K. 'Lin' (DOC); McKenzie, Jane
M. (DOC)' ,
Subject: 380 200 Community Supervision of Offenders
«File: 380 200 Community Supervision of Offenders. doc » Katrina - Here is the policy after
having gone through my simplification and run past the union, the policy owner, Lin and,the RA's for
comment. I have also combined this with 380.100 Offender Supervision Status. So that policy will no
longer exist. There was discussion about the Medicinal Use of Marijuana being included in this policy - I
really do nof think it belongs here, but am not sure just where is should go- this is the policy the AB put it in
so I left it here. In the future when the annual review is done, maybe there should be some consideration
of placing it in the 320.155 Violation Policy Also the other area that causes eyebrows to lift is the Duty
Officer Coverage section- it really does not belong in this policy but where does it belong. Un suggested
370.100- unfortunately, that policy is just being developed.
Autumn- This is on to you - I am keeping all of my notes fat reference on this one. Please also see the
above as you may want to switch some things around.
Lin- Please ta'ke o'ne last look to make sure this all makes sense, please .............it is all running together
oome now.
5/13/2009
PDU-6655-3 000111