DOC request three complete - Cannabis Defense Coalition

From:
Serthon, Ralph M. (DOC)
Sent:
Friday, April 17, 2009 6:44 PM
To:
Wheeler, Judine L. (DOC)
Subject: . FW: 3aO 200 Community Supervision of Offenders
Marijuana disclosure
. From: Serthon, Ralph M. (DOC)
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:36 AM
To: Witten, Dell-Autumn W. COOC)
Subject: RE: 380 200· Community Supervision of Offenders
You're number 1!
. From: Witten, Dell-Autumn W. COOC)
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:46 PM
To: Berthon, Ralph M. (~OC)
Subject: RE: 380 200 Community Supervision of Offenders
Thanks Ralph! There is already an AS in the works for the violator policy, so I will work with Lin
on adding the violation language to it. I will need to check around on moving the medicinal
marijuana language; bufif I get clearance can move that in the same AS: '
Also, we are currently working on-improving the process for making changes to policy between
scheduled reviews. So hopefully your frustrations will be'addressed soon!
Have a great afternoon,
Autumn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Berthcin, Ralph M. (DOC)
Wednesday, AprtlOl, 200912:04 PM
Witten, Deli-Autumn W. (DOC); Meusborn-Marsh, Stefani L. (DOC)
FW: 380 200 Community Supervision of Offenders
Folks,
I really cannot tell you how many times I have seen this policy or ,who all have sent it to me
for review in the past year. I am excited (I hope it doesn't show!) to see we are close to
putting it to bed. I have read this version and made one minor change that 1 can live with or
without. It has to do with the ten day contact rule. I added a couple of words in regard to
intakes as it is not captured in the intake policy 310.100.
In regard to Autumn's remarks below, I can see adding the KIOSK language because it
directly applies to supervision on a global scale.
As for the violations language, we need to take it out and do an Admin Bulleting (AS) to the
violations policy. In this case the violation dat~ can be captured in an AB, the new 380.200
can go out, when the violation policy gets a re-write we add the AB data and .we are all
happy. Well almost all of us. And of course the same logic applies to the Community -
Supervision of high Risk offender's piece; take it out, put it into and AS and be done with it.
The medical marijuana piece; that too belongs in a violation policy as it related directly to the
process for establishing credibility to violate someone. In that there is an AS already out on
marijuana, we could amend that bulletin and re issue it and tie it to the violation policy.
Two more cents worth:
PDU-6655-3 000085