13.03.2015 Views

ECSA - The Tramp Shipping Market Mar 2015

ECSA - The Tramp Shipping Market Mar 2015

ECSA - The Tramp Shipping Market Mar 2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ECSA</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Tramp</strong> <strong>Shipping</strong> <strong><strong>Mar</strong>ket</strong><br />

14.4 Pool arrangements<br />

One of the most common arrangements for working together in the shipping industry is the<br />

"Pool". <strong>Shipping</strong> pools are currently used in almost all segments of the tramp/non-liner shipping<br />

market including products tanker business, the chemical tanker business, the LPG business, the<br />

bulk carrier business and the crude tanker business. Recently established pools include a capesize<br />

bulker pool of over a hundred vessels, while in the tanker sector, at least 20% of VLCCs are<br />

understood to be in a pool, and almost a third of all long and mid-range product tankers (this<br />

includes all product tankers larger than 45,000 dwt in size).<br />

A shipping pool can be defined as “a collection of similar vessel types under various ownerships<br />

placed in the care of a central administration” 17 . Areas of potential co-operation are shown in<br />

table 5. Pools are generally developed for 2 reasons. Firstly to allow participants to provide the<br />

service levels required by their major customers. Secondly, to improve transport efficiency by<br />

special investment and increased ship utilisation e.g. by arranging backhaul cargoes more<br />

effectively than a small group of ships could do.<br />

14.5 Space Charter Agreements<br />

In the breakbulk era liner companies operated freight pools, particularly in thin trades, in order to<br />

spread operational costs. Containerisation saw the introduction of consortia (sharing<br />

administrative and operating costs and revenue) and alliances (sharing vessel operating costs) as<br />

carriers sought to drive down operating costs and increase vessel size to access scale. Vessel<br />

sharing agreements, today’s most common format, operate on the basis of slot swaps between<br />

participating carriers with inequalities of provision and usage settled by cash cross-payments at<br />

pre-determined prices. In addition, carriers sell slots to third parties, to competing lines without<br />

sufficient market support to start their own services, and to lines seeking to supplement their own<br />

service capacity as well as to container leasing companies seeking to reposition empty containers.<br />

Slot charters are generally on the basis of long term inter-line contractual arrangements, with slot<br />

prices set for a fixed duration, but the slot prices for spot arrangements are fixed ad hoc. Needless<br />

to say, carriers prefer to restrict slot sales to capacity that they cannot themselves make profitable<br />

use of. Instances in which space is subcontracted to cargo interests are extremely rare or nonexistent.<br />

Space charter arrangements also exist in some of the specialised sectors. Considering the<br />

customer structure and the service requirements they place on the carriers it is a need to optimise<br />

capacity utilisation, sailing frequencies and port coverage to the benefit of the customers. Carriers<br />

use both irregular ad hoc space charter arrangements mainly to cover short term fluctuations as<br />

well as more regular fixed positioning space charters.<br />

17 William V. Packard 1989 <strong>Shipping</strong> Pools, Lloyds of London Press Ltd, London p 5<br />

Clarkson Research Services Limited 33 <strong>Mar</strong>ch <strong>2015</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!