Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A2.6 LNG <strong><strong>Mar</strong>ket</strong> Profile<br />
World<br />
EU-28<br />
No. m. cu.m m. GT No. Owners No. m. cu.m m. GT No. Owners<br />
Fleet (Feb-<strong>2015</strong>) 419 61.1 42.3 62 97 13.8 9.3 18<br />
Orderbook (Feb-<strong>2015</strong>) 164 24.9 16.2 44 51 7.2 4.7 11<br />
O'book as % of fleet 39.1% 40.8% 38.2% 71.0% 52.6% 52.4% 50.5% 61.1%<br />
Top 20 Owners' Fleet (Feb-<strong>2015</strong>) 284 43.7 30.1 20 97 13.8 9.3<br />
% of fleet 67.8% 71.6% 71.2% 32.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Ownership Type (Feb-<strong>2015</strong>)<br />
Public Listed 172 23.5 16.4 16 32 4.8 3.1 4<br />
Independent Private 107 15.5 10.5 26 40 6.0 4.0 9<br />
Cargo Interests 61 11.3 7.7 8 2 0.1 0.1 2<br />
Oil Company 47 6.1 4.4 7 23 2.9 2.1 3<br />
State Interests 20 3.0 2.1 3<br />
Financial<br />
Other 12 1.6 1.1 2<br />
NB Contracts (2014) 75 11.2 7.2<br />
% of fleet 17.9% 18.3% 17.0%<br />
S/H Sales (2014) 11 1.6 1.1<br />
% of fleet 2.6% 2.6% 2.5%<br />
Entry Conditions*. Asset costs are extremely high - current NB prices are $200m. LNG transport by sea also requires substantial investment in<br />
liquefaction and cargo handling facilities. More specialised technical knowledge to operate.<br />
Type of Cargo, Charters. LNG (Methane). Typically newbuildings built against long term contracts but a small spot market has<br />
developed, and average contracts have reduced in length.<br />
Cargo Volumes 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />
Global Imports, m.tonnes 171 173 183 221 247 242 244 248<br />
growth 1% 6% 21% 11% -2% 1% 2%<br />
EU Imports, m.tonnes 36 39 48 59 63 45 34 31<br />
growth 7% 24% 23% 5% -28% -25% -7%<br />
Asian Imports, m.tonnes 112 119 114 133 154 167 174 178<br />
growth 6% -4% 17% 16% 8% 4% 2%<br />
Source: Clarkson Research, February <strong>2015</strong>. Vessels designed to carry liquefied natural gas.<br />
LNG Sector Overview<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem of moving “stranded” gas to points of demand is that it is a highly capital intensive,<br />
technologically sophisticated and expensive. That much of the surplus of natural gas supplies is also<br />
in remote and lesser-developed parts of the world has merely compounded the problems. <strong>The</strong> supply<br />
chain involves: Gas field production and pipeline, Liquefaction plant and storage, <strong>Shipping</strong>, Regasification<br />
plant and storage, Distribution and marketing.<br />
Natural gas liquefies at –162C (-260F) at atmospheric pressure, with a volume 1/600th of its gaseous<br />
state. Transportation and storage of the LNG is then viable in insulated cryogenic tanks. After transportation<br />
the LNG has to be re-gasified before being marketed. In a typical split of the costs of such<br />
an LNG supply chain, the biggest costs are the development of the gas field and building the liquefaction<br />
plant (each around 40%); shipping, re-gasification and marketing having nearly equal shares<br />
of the balance.<br />
<strong>The</strong> LNG industry has traditionally been tied to long term contracts of 20 years or more. Due to the<br />
cost of building facilities, finance was only available if banks could see long term guarantees of a<br />
project’s viability. <strong>The</strong> supply chain was characterised by fixed contracts with destination clauses to<br />
prevent cargoes being diverted into alternative markets. Specific import terminals serviced specific<br />
contracts, with shipping capacity contracted for specific routes. Whilst this is still the dominant<br />
structure, the growth of the industry has led to a rise in excess capacity above that demanded by long<br />
term contracts. As a result, a growing proportion of trade is now done on ether the spot market or<br />
Clarkson Research Services 58 <strong>Mar</strong>ch <strong>2015</strong>