18.04.2015 Views

Mileage-Based User Fee Winners and Losers - RAND Corporation

Mileage-Based User Fee Winners and Losers - RAND Corporation

Mileage-Based User Fee Winners and Losers - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ratio of adults to vehicles<br />

As discussed above, the number of vehicles <strong>and</strong> workers in a household are each important<br />

predictors of dem<strong>and</strong>. However, it is also important to account for the ratio of vehicles to adults.<br />

VMT is increasing with both vehicles, as we have discussed above, <strong>and</strong> with adults, which follows<br />

logic. This variable categorizes each household into 9 types, 10 if households without any vehicles<br />

are included, based on the number of vehicles owned (1, 2 or more than 2) in different household<br />

sizes (1, 2 or more than 2 adults).<br />

Table 3.6 displays the proportion of households in each vehicle to adult category type. In<br />

addition, the coefficients for these variables are included, along with their robust st<strong>and</strong>ard errors<br />

because these were omitted from Table 3.2 for space constraints. All are significant at the 1 percent<br />

level of statistical significance with pooled data in the model with price interactions. 34 The<br />

coefficients, along with the mean VMT for each category, clearly show that VMT is increasing jointly<br />

with the number of vehicles <strong>and</strong> the number of adults.<br />

Table 3.6 Coefficients For the Vehicles to Adults Household Type Variable<br />

Number Number Percent of Average<br />

Robust<br />

Coefficient<br />

of Vehicles Of Adults Population VMT<br />

St. Error<br />

0 all 8.6 0 - -<br />

1 1 20.6 10,196 0 (1)<br />

1 2 10.0 11,633 0.16 0.02<br />

1 3 or more 1.7 11,527 0.20 0.05<br />

2 1 3.7 19,050 0.98 0.08<br />

2 2 29.0 24,482 1.15 0.07<br />

2 3 or more 3.6 25,224 1.22 0.08<br />

3 or more 1 1.9 31,500 1.27 0.09<br />

3 or more 2 12.9 36,389 1.33 0.08<br />

3 or more 3 or more 8.8 44,266 1.40 0.08<br />

Note: (1) The model would be over-specified if this coefficient was estimated.<br />

Life cycle groups<br />

These two categorical variables (condensed from ten groups of life cycle type) control for<br />

households with children <strong>and</strong> households comprised entirely of retired adults. 35 Households with<br />

children, comprising 35 percent of households, have a much greater dem<strong>and</strong> for VMT than other<br />

households. Retired households, in contrast, have a much lower dem<strong>and</strong> for VMT. Retired<br />

households comprise 27 percent of the population in 2008-09. This is an increase from 2001-02<br />

when retired households comprised 24 percent of the population. The differences in the travel<br />

behavior, <strong>and</strong> vehicle characteristics, between households in different lifecycle stages have important<br />

equity implications as well. It is also significant that these statistics reflect the aging of the American<br />

population as well as the increasing mobility of older Americans. The average VMT of retired<br />

households has increased from 13,164 in 2001-02 to 13,798 in 2008-09. This was during a period<br />

when, as previously noted, other households were reducing VMT due to higher travel costs <strong>and</strong><br />

lower incomes.<br />

34 The variables are not all individually significant at this level in the model without interactions but they are all jointly significant at the<br />

1 percent level of statistical significance.<br />

35 More information on the ten original life cycle groups <strong>and</strong> the details on the construction of this variable are available in the<br />

Technical Appendix.<br />

Page 40 of 131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!