concept for more efficient support of the arts in 2007–2013 - Divadlo.cz
concept for more efficient support of the arts in 2007–2013 - Divadlo.cz
concept for more efficient support of the arts in 2007–2013 - Divadlo.cz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 6. Programme <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Integration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roma Community<br />
(<strong>in</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> Czk)<br />
Project <strong>support</strong> 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Table 7. Programme <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cultural Activities <strong>of</strong> Ethnic M<strong>in</strong>orities<br />
(<strong>in</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> Czk)<br />
Project <strong>support</strong> 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Table 8. Programme <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dissem<strong>in</strong>ation and Reception <strong>of</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Languages <strong>of</strong> Ethnic M<strong>in</strong>orities (<strong>in</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> Czk)<br />
Project <strong>support</strong> 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Table 9. Programme <strong>for</strong> Research and Development (<strong>in</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> Czk)<br />
2007–<br />
2013<br />
State budget 40 40 40 45 45 45 45 300<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
subsidy recipient<br />
2007–<br />
2013<br />
State budget 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 120<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
subsidy recipient<br />
2007–<br />
2013<br />
State budget 3 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5 28<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
subsidy recipient<br />
0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 9<br />
T o t a l 3.9 3.9 4.6 5.3 6 6.7 6.7 37.1<br />
5 5 6 7 7.7 8.1 8.5 9<br />
T o t a l 20 20 22 24 25.7 27.1 28.5 167.3<br />
12 12 12 14 14 14 14 92<br />
T o t a l 52 52 52 59 59 59 59 392<br />
MC expenditures on<br />
research programmes<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>arts</strong><br />
sub-programme<br />
2 365 2 173 2 173 2 273 2 376 11 360<br />
Socio-economic analyses<br />
sub-programme<br />
1 100 1 000 1 000 900 800 4 800<br />
Non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>arts</strong><br />
sub-programme<br />
1 136 1 231 1 232 1 231 595 5 425<br />
Audio-visual<br />
sub-programme<br />
0 200 400 400 100 1 100<br />
Programme expenditures are approved to 2011; government materials <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> period<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2012–2013 are to be approved.<br />
82<br />
Table 10. State Fund <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Support and Development <strong>of</strong> Czech<br />
C<strong>in</strong>ematography and <strong>the</strong> State Fund <strong>of</strong> Culture (<strong>in</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> Czk)*<br />
* For a comprehensive account <strong>the</strong> optimal development <strong>of</strong> funds outside <strong>the</strong> state budget adm<strong>in</strong>istered<br />
by <strong>the</strong> state funds is <strong>in</strong>dicated.<br />
State Fund <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CR<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Support and<br />
Development <strong>of</strong><br />
Czech<br />
C<strong>in</strong>ematography<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
2007–<br />
2013<br />
Support 600 650 700 750 750 750 750 4 950<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
subsidy recipient<br />
600 650 700 750 750 750 750 4 950<br />
T o t a l 1 200 1 300 1 400 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 9 900<br />
State Fund <strong>of</strong> Culture<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CR<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
2007–<br />
2013<br />
Support 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 28<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
subsidy recipient<br />
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 14<br />
T o t a l 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 42<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>support</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>arts</strong> are spent by o<strong>the</strong>r m<strong>in</strong>istries through <strong>the</strong>ir subsidy<br />
titles (M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Education, Youth and Sport, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Foreign Affairs, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>for</strong> Regional<br />
Development). However, exact figures cannot be provided because <strong>support</strong> <strong>for</strong> entities provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
public services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sphere <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>arts</strong> <strong>for</strong>m a part <strong>of</strong> broader bulk subsidies (e. g. Fund<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> Post-secondary Schools, Programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>for</strong> Regional Development).<br />
For <strong>the</strong> effective fulfilment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Concept it can be assumed that certa<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources<br />
will be spent out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r public budgets, especially those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> municipalities and<br />
<strong>the</strong> regions. However, it is not possible to specify <strong>the</strong> exact figures, as <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional authorities<br />
this material has <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> a recommendation and does not establish mandatory expenditures.<br />
83