10.06.2015 Views

DownloadAsset?assetId=F14FC0EBB1C24FAC93A09302BE386549&filename=moe_vsb_review_report_june_2015

DownloadAsset?assetId=F14FC0EBB1C24FAC93A09302BE386549&filename=moe_vsb_review_report_june_2015

DownloadAsset?assetId=F14FC0EBB1C24FAC93A09302BE386549&filename=moe_vsb_review_report_june_2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Using these same assumptions with respect to funding and a stable asset base, VBE is projecting that<br />

by 2031 deferred maintenance will exceed the cost of replacing the District’s facilities. The below<br />

chart, prepared from data provided by VBE from its VFA information, shows the level of funding and<br />

impact on the FCI under three scenarios, all of which assume the current asset base remains<br />

unchanged:<br />

►<br />

Yellow - current level of funding VBE allocates to facility upgrades<br />

► Grey – level of funding VBE is required to allocate to maintain the current district-wide FCI of 0.48<br />

►<br />

Green – level of funding VBE is required to allocate to address immediate high priority deferred<br />

maintenance items and reduce the district-wide FCI to Provincial average of 0.43<br />

This chart below is provided to show the scale of VBE’s maintenance needs if it continues to maintain<br />

all 112 schools under the existing approach.<br />

EY was not provided with the deferred maintenance costs forecast on a school-by-school basis and<br />

accordingly is not able to provide a graphical comparison of what the deferred maintenance profile<br />

would look like if VBE reduced its current number of schools by 19 Underutilized Schools identified in<br />

section 6.6.4.<br />

162 Confidential | All Rights Reserved | EY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!