13.06.2015 Views

Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global

Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global

Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation and <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Uruguayan Forest Certification scheme <strong>against</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong> Council<br />

8. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> Certification and Accreditation<br />

Arrangements <strong>against</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong>C Requirements<br />

8.1 Certification Bodies<br />

8.1.1 Competence <strong>of</strong> Certification Bodies<br />

1) Does the scheme documentation require that certification shall be carried out by<br />

impartial, independent third parties that cannot be involved in the standard-setting<br />

process as governing or decision making bodies, or in the forest management and are<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> the certified entity? (Annex 6, 3.1)<br />

<strong>UFCS</strong> documentation (refer to Section 5, SD03) requires that certification be performed by<br />

organisations that are “impartial and independent” and not involved in any process <strong>of</strong><br />

normalisation (standard setting) or part <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong> Uruguay.<br />

Conforms<br />

2) Does the scheme documentation require that a certification body for forest<br />

management certification or chain <strong>of</strong> custody certification <strong>against</strong> a scheme specific chain<br />

<strong>of</strong> custody standard shall fulfil requirements defined in ISO 17021 or ISO Guide 65?<br />

(Annex 6, 3.1)<br />

<strong>UFCS</strong> documentation (refer to SD03, Section 3) requires a certification body to have<br />

documented procedures “compatible with the requirements <strong>of</strong> ISO 17021 or ISO Guide 65”.<br />

Conforms<br />

3) Does the scheme documentation require that certification bodies carrying out chain <strong>of</strong><br />

custody certification <strong>against</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong> Annex 4 fulfil requirements defined in ISO Guide 65?<br />

(Annex 6, 3.1)<br />

<strong>UFCS</strong> documentation (refer to SD03, Section 3) requires certification bodies undertaking CoC<br />

certification to have a “system that complies with requirements <strong>of</strong> ISO 65 Guide”.<br />

Conforms<br />

4) Does the scheme documentation require that certification bodies carrying out forest<br />

certification shall have the technical competence in forest management on its economic,<br />

social and environmental impacts, and on the forest certification criteria? (Annex 6, 3.1)<br />

<strong>UFCS</strong> documentation requires certification bodies to have competencies in UNIT 1152:2009<br />

(Sustainable Forest Management – Criteria and Indicators) (refer to SD03, Section 3); and<br />

require personnel to have competence in the field <strong>of</strong> forest management and related social,<br />

economic and environmental impacts (refer to SD03, Section 5 (m)).<br />

Conforms<br />

5) Does the scheme documentation require that certification bodies carrying out chain <strong>of</strong><br />

custody certification have technical competence in forest based product procurement and<br />

processing, material flows in different stages <strong>of</strong> processing and trading? (Annex 6, 3.1)<br />

<strong>UFCS</strong> documentation requires certification bodies to have competencies in Chain <strong>of</strong> Custody<br />

(<strong>PEFC</strong> – Annex 4) (refer to SD03, Section 3); and personnel with required competencies in forest<br />

based chain <strong>of</strong> custody processes (refer to SD03, Section 5 (m)).<br />

Conforms<br />

www.itsglobal.net Page 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!