13.06.2015 Views

Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global

Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global

Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation and <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Uruguayan Forest Certification scheme <strong>against</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong> Council<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In a letter dated 8 January <strong>2010</strong>, the President and Vice President <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong> Uruguay submitted<br />

an application to <strong>PEFC</strong>C (Programme for the Endorsement <strong>of</strong> Forest Certification Council) for<br />

the conformity <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Uruguayan Forest Certification Scheme (<strong>UFCS</strong>).<br />

On 14 April <strong>2010</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong>C appointed <strong>ITS</strong> <strong>Global</strong> to undertake an independent conformity<br />

<strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> <strong>against</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong>C.<br />

Scope <strong>of</strong> Assessment<br />

The conformity <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> was undertaken consistent with <strong>PEFC</strong>C minimum<br />

requirements for national and sub-national schemes as detailed in <strong>PEFC</strong>C Technical Document,<br />

Annex 7.<br />

Following a summary <strong>of</strong> the development and evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> (Chapter 2) the report<br />

assesses the conformity <strong>of</strong> <strong>UFCS</strong> <strong>against</strong> the framework relevant to:<br />

• Standard setting process (Chapter 3);<br />

• Implementation levels and organisation arrangement <strong>of</strong> the certification scheme (Chapter<br />

4);<br />

• Forest management standard (Chapter 5);<br />

• Chain <strong>of</strong> custody standard (Chapter 6);<br />

• Implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong> logo usage rights (Chapter 7);<br />

• Certification and accreditation arrangements (Chapter 8).<br />

The report also includes:<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the comments received from stakeholders resulting from the public<br />

consultation period (Annex 1);<br />

• Intelligence and insight gained from a Field Visit and meeting with stakeholders who have<br />

been involved in the development and/or use <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> (Annex 2);<br />

• <strong>PEFC</strong>C Minimum Requirements Checklist (Annex 3); and<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the comments from the Panel <strong>of</strong> Experts (which are provided in Annex 4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

• report)<br />

Assessment Process and Methodology for Report<br />

Evidence and <strong>assessment</strong>s detailed in the report are generated by benchmarking <strong>PEFC</strong>C’s<br />

requirements <strong>against</strong> the standards, processes and accountabilities detailed in the <strong>UFCS</strong>’s<br />

application documentation together with documentation and records reviewed during Field<br />

Visit.<br />

The following conformance definitions were applied in assessing the conformity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong><br />

with requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong>C:<br />

• Conforms – the criteria and requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> are assessed as equivalent to <strong>PEFC</strong>C<br />

requirements;<br />

• Partly conforms – the criteria and requirement <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> are assessed as being, in<br />

principle, equivalent to <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements but with minor inconsistencies or gaps when<br />

compared to <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements;<br />

• Does not conform – the criteria and requirement in the <strong>UFCS</strong> are assessed as having<br />

substantial differences to the <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements;<br />

• Not applicable (NA).<br />

www.itsglobal.net Page 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!