Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global
Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global
Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Evaluation and <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Uruguayan Forest Certification scheme <strong>against</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong> Council<br />
1. Introduction<br />
In a letter dated 8 January <strong>2010</strong>, the President and Vice President <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong> Uruguay submitted<br />
an application to <strong>PEFC</strong>C (Programme for the Endorsement <strong>of</strong> Forest Certification Council) for<br />
the conformity <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Uruguayan Forest Certification Scheme (<strong>UFCS</strong>).<br />
On 14 April <strong>2010</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong>C appointed <strong>ITS</strong> <strong>Global</strong> to undertake an independent conformity<br />
<strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> <strong>against</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong>C.<br />
Scope <strong>of</strong> Assessment<br />
The conformity <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> was undertaken consistent with <strong>PEFC</strong>C minimum<br />
requirements for national and sub-national schemes as detailed in <strong>PEFC</strong>C Technical Document,<br />
Annex 7.<br />
Following a summary <strong>of</strong> the development and evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> (Chapter 2) the report<br />
assesses the conformity <strong>of</strong> <strong>UFCS</strong> <strong>against</strong> the framework relevant to:<br />
• Standard setting process (Chapter 3);<br />
• Implementation levels and organisation arrangement <strong>of</strong> the certification scheme (Chapter<br />
4);<br />
• Forest management standard (Chapter 5);<br />
• Chain <strong>of</strong> custody standard (Chapter 6);<br />
• Implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong> logo usage rights (Chapter 7);<br />
• Certification and accreditation arrangements (Chapter 8).<br />
The report also includes:<br />
• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the comments received from stakeholders resulting from the public<br />
consultation period (Annex 1);<br />
• Intelligence and insight gained from a Field Visit and meeting with stakeholders who have<br />
been involved in the development and/or use <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> (Annex 2);<br />
• <strong>PEFC</strong>C Minimum Requirements Checklist (Annex 3); and<br />
• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the comments from the Panel <strong>of</strong> Experts (which are provided in Annex 4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
• report)<br />
Assessment Process and Methodology for Report<br />
Evidence and <strong>assessment</strong>s detailed in the report are generated by benchmarking <strong>PEFC</strong>C’s<br />
requirements <strong>against</strong> the standards, processes and accountabilities detailed in the <strong>UFCS</strong>’s<br />
application documentation together with documentation and records reviewed during Field<br />
Visit.<br />
The following conformance definitions were applied in assessing the conformity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong><br />
with requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>PEFC</strong>C:<br />
• Conforms – the criteria and requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> are assessed as equivalent to <strong>PEFC</strong>C<br />
requirements;<br />
• Partly conforms – the criteria and requirement <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UFCS</strong> are assessed as being, in<br />
principle, equivalent to <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements but with minor inconsistencies or gaps when<br />
compared to <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements;<br />
• Does not conform – the criteria and requirement in the <strong>UFCS</strong> are assessed as having<br />
substantial differences to the <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements;<br />
• Not applicable (NA).<br />
www.itsglobal.net Page 9