Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global
Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global
Conformity assessment of UFCS against PEFC (2010).pdf - ITS Global
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Evaluation and <strong>assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Uruguayan Forest Certification scheme <strong>against</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>PEFC</strong> Council<br />
25 4.2.3 Group Certification This introduction relates in fact to the SFM system which<br />
relates to 5.3 <strong>of</strong> GD2<br />
25 35)<br />
The criteria and requirements for group certification as set<br />
The criteria and<br />
out in SD07 comply with <strong>PEFC</strong>C requirements.<br />
requirements for group There is no need to repeat the <strong>PEFC</strong>C reference!<br />
certification within <strong>UFCS</strong><br />
(SD07) comply with <strong>PEFC</strong>C<br />
requirements detailed in<br />
Annex 3, 4.1b.<br />
26 43) Comment – Under 7, it is explicit for the member but it is<br />
implicit for the Group Administrator!<br />
... forest area under his/her management should be added<br />
by <strong>PEFC</strong>C<br />
Comments noted. Text amended accordingly.<br />
Comments valid. Text amended accordingly<br />
Comments noted.<br />
p. 27,<br />
4.2.4, 46<br />
The consultants agree with the comment. The<br />
consultants used the exact wording <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>PEFC</strong> Council Minimum Requirements<br />
Checklist (GL 2/<strong>2010</strong>), but would recommend<br />
that <strong>PEFC</strong>C considers amending the<br />
documentation so that it does not contain<br />
gender specific references.<br />
27 45) The shading is missing for the Conforms Comments valid. Report has been amended<br />
27 48)<br />
… on ad hoc basis … … on an ad hoc basis …<br />
28 49)<br />
… on ad hoc basis … … on an ad hoc basis …<br />
28 4.4 Overall Assessment Comment: I have a real concern on the <strong>assessment</strong> for 7),<br />
10), 14), 17) and 43) – I would seek further evidence to<br />
justify the current <strong>assessment</strong>.<br />
5. Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>UFCS</strong> Forest Management Standards <strong>against</strong> PEOLG<br />
accordingly.<br />
Comments valid. Report has been amended<br />
accordingly.<br />
Comments valid. Report has been amended<br />
accordingly.<br />
Comments noted. Assessment modified to<br />
recognise non-conformity associated with a<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> documentation requirements for<br />
making summary <strong>of</strong> FMP publicly available.<br />
29 5.1 Assessment Framework,<br />
1st Para<br />
<strong>UFCS</strong> utilizes Norm<br />
(Standard) 1152: 2009 …<br />
The <strong>UFCS</strong> utilizes Norm (Standard) UNIT 1152: 2009 …<br />
The conformity <strong>of</strong> the Criteria and Indicators <strong>of</strong> Standard …<br />
It is the C&I which provide the equivalence with the<br />
Comments were noted. Report has been<br />
amended accordingly.<br />
Text amended.<br />
www.itsglobal.net Page 81