Common Mental Disorders Depression - New Zealand Doctor
Common Mental Disorders Depression - New Zealand Doctor
Common Mental Disorders Depression - New Zealand Doctor
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Overall mental health<br />
A number of tools have been validated for assessment of common mental disorders,<br />
but the PHQ-9 appears to be the most robust: it is well-validated, acceptable to<br />
patients and quick for practitioners to review. 307 Other acceptable tools are the<br />
General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) 312,313 and the <strong>Common</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> Disorder<br />
Questionnaire (CMDQ). 314 A <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> tool, CHAT, appears to have good<br />
sensitivity and specificity for a range of lifestyle and mental health risk factors<br />
(depression, anxiety, alcohol and other drug misuse, problem gambling, stress, abuse,<br />
anger problems, and tobacco use). 305 It is less accurate as a check for inactivity<br />
and eating disorders. It should be noted that validation of the CHAT tool utilised a<br />
composite gold standard comprising other validated screening tools and diagnostic<br />
tests, rather than diagnostic interviews for all conditions. 305 The CHAT tool has been<br />
found acceptable in a large multi-ethnic <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> population. 301,315<br />
<strong>Depression</strong> and anxiety<br />
The verbal 2–3 question screening tool for depression (see Box 5.2) is as accurate<br />
as longer tools and is acceptable and feasible for use in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> populations. 299<br />
The Help question (see Box 5.2) has been validated in a written form. 302<br />
The PHQ-9 is reliable and valid for identifying depression and also for severity<br />
assessment, 316-320 and it is sensitive to changes for both major depression and<br />
dysthymia. 321 Other brief tools, such as the Center for Epidemiological Studies<br />
<strong>Depression</strong> scale (CES-D), 322 the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index<br />
(WHO-5), 319 and Duke-Anxiety-<strong>Depression</strong> scale (Duke-AD) 323 are less accurate<br />
for routine use in primary care.<br />
Both the GAD-7 and the 2-question version of the same instrument (GAD-2)<br />
are valid for detecting anxiety disorders. 298,324<br />
The K10 questionnaire measures psychological distress, focusing on anxiety<br />
and depression, and has been widely used in population surveys and secondary<br />
care clinical settings. 34,308 It has not been validated for test-retest reliability or for<br />
sensitivity to change 325 and no evidence was found on its validity in primary care.<br />
The recommended cut-off points are based on data from community samples. 325<br />
No valid case-finding tools for dysthymia were identified.<br />
Alcohol and/or substance abuse<br />
The AUDIT questionnaire was found to be the most accurate tool for identifying<br />
risky, harmful and hazardous drinking, 310 while CAGE (a 4-question acronym) is the<br />
most accurate for identifying lifetime alcohol abuse or dependence. 311 A US study 300<br />
identified two questions adapted from CAGE which detected 80% of current drug<br />
62<br />
Identification of <strong>Common</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Disorders</strong> and Management of <strong>Depression</strong> in Primary Care