19.06.2015 Views

Common Mental Disorders Depression - New Zealand Doctor

Common Mental Disorders Depression - New Zealand Doctor

Common Mental Disorders Depression - New Zealand Doctor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overall mental health<br />

A number of tools have been validated for assessment of common mental disorders,<br />

but the PHQ-9 appears to be the most robust: it is well-validated, acceptable to<br />

patients and quick for practitioners to review. 307 Other acceptable tools are the<br />

General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) 312,313 and the <strong>Common</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> Disorder<br />

Questionnaire (CMDQ). 314 A <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> tool, CHAT, appears to have good<br />

sensitivity and specificity for a range of lifestyle and mental health risk factors<br />

(depression, anxiety, alcohol and other drug misuse, problem gambling, stress, abuse,<br />

anger problems, and tobacco use). 305 It is less accurate as a check for inactivity<br />

and eating disorders. It should be noted that validation of the CHAT tool utilised a<br />

composite gold standard comprising other validated screening tools and diagnostic<br />

tests, rather than diagnostic interviews for all conditions. 305 The CHAT tool has been<br />

found acceptable in a large multi-ethnic <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> population. 301,315<br />

<strong>Depression</strong> and anxiety<br />

The verbal 2–3 question screening tool for depression (see Box 5.2) is as accurate<br />

as longer tools and is acceptable and feasible for use in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> populations. 299<br />

The Help question (see Box 5.2) has been validated in a written form. 302<br />

The PHQ-9 is reliable and valid for identifying depression and also for severity<br />

assessment, 316-320 and it is sensitive to changes for both major depression and<br />

dysthymia. 321 Other brief tools, such as the Center for Epidemiological Studies<br />

<strong>Depression</strong> scale (CES-D), 322 the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index<br />

(WHO-5), 319 and Duke-Anxiety-<strong>Depression</strong> scale (Duke-AD) 323 are less accurate<br />

for routine use in primary care.<br />

Both the GAD-7 and the 2-question version of the same instrument (GAD-2)<br />

are valid for detecting anxiety disorders. 298,324<br />

The K10 questionnaire measures psychological distress, focusing on anxiety<br />

and depression, and has been widely used in population surveys and secondary<br />

care clinical settings. 34,308 It has not been validated for test-retest reliability or for<br />

sensitivity to change 325 and no evidence was found on its validity in primary care.<br />

The recommended cut-off points are based on data from community samples. 325<br />

No valid case-finding tools for dysthymia were identified.<br />

Alcohol and/or substance abuse<br />

The AUDIT questionnaire was found to be the most accurate tool for identifying<br />

risky, harmful and hazardous drinking, 310 while CAGE (a 4-question acronym) is the<br />

most accurate for identifying lifetime alcohol abuse or dependence. 311 A US study 300<br />

identified two questions adapted from CAGE which detected 80% of current drug<br />

62<br />

Identification of <strong>Common</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Disorders</strong> and Management of <strong>Depression</strong> in Primary Care

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!