20.06.2015 Views

Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...

Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...

Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What is the integRation guide?<br />

The Integration Guide is a practical starting point, designed to help you implement the <strong>Misconduct</strong> <strong>Resistance</strong><br />

<strong>Framework</strong> in your agency. It is targeted at managers <strong>and</strong> others in specialist positions who have responsibility for<br />

the development, implementation <strong>and</strong> monitoring of agency misconduct resistance strategies.<br />

The guide contains detailed information about each outcome <strong>and</strong> provides a methodology for achieving these<br />

outcomes. The key elements underpinning the outcomes each have a set of Focus Questions <strong>and</strong> Signs of<br />

Success, with supporting Ideas to Build Capacity for each outcome area.<br />

The guide also includes a reference <strong>and</strong> resource section to help you access more detailed information should<br />

you need to.<br />

FOCUS QUESTiONS identify some of the potentially relevant issues that your agency may need to consider<br />

against the key elements. They are designed to help you evaluate how comprehensive <strong>and</strong> effective your current<br />

strategies are, <strong>and</strong> to help identify areas that may need further attention.<br />

SiGNS OF SUCCESS are descriptions of the types of results your agency should be working towards for a particular<br />

key element. They provide examples of what could be seen in agencies that have successfully implemented a key<br />

element.<br />

iDEAS TO BUiLD CApACiTy have been provided for each outcome to help your agency improve management<br />

of a specific issue where a gap or need has been identified. These ideas represent some commonly used<br />

countermeasures, actions <strong>and</strong> strategies that you can implement.<br />

The questions, signs <strong>and</strong> ideas are not exhaustive <strong>and</strong> simply provide a broad-based reference model.<br />

you should customise your use of the guide to capture your agency’s unique business environment <strong>and</strong> needs.<br />

ReMeMBeR<br />

the guide is not<br />

An audit or compliance checklist that must be strictly<br />

followed.<br />

A prescriptive method for addressing the key<br />

elements.<br />

A sequential list of activities.<br />

A definitive list of all questions <strong>and</strong> issues to be<br />

addressed.<br />

A one-size-fits-all model for how to integrate<br />

misconduct resistance.<br />

The only way to approach implementation of<br />

misconduct resistance.<br />

Intended to provide all the right questions or answers.<br />

A m<strong>and</strong>atory document.<br />

the guide is<br />

A place to start when considering how to integrate<br />

misconduct resistance.<br />

An overview of the key elements for your agency to<br />

address.<br />

A prompt of the issues <strong>and</strong> areas to consider.<br />

A reference from which to select areas needing<br />

attention.<br />

A generic model that can be customised to reflect your<br />

agency’s unique business <strong>and</strong> risk environments.<br />

A source of ideas for building capacity where a need<br />

is identified.<br />

A guide for obtaining further information <strong>and</strong><br />

resources.<br />

<strong>Misconduct</strong> is a significant business risk for all public sector agencies, <strong>and</strong> the costs of failing<br />

to manage it effectively can be severe. In a 2006 survey, KPMG found that 47% <strong>and</strong> 32% of<br />

Australian businesses, including the public sector, respectively reported fraud <strong>and</strong> unethical<br />

conduct by staff. The most commonly reported conduct risks (after fraud) were misuse of<br />

resources, false sick claims <strong>and</strong> disclosures of information.<br />

KPMG Forensic Fraud Survey 2006.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!