Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...
Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...
Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the right review<br />
Review <strong>and</strong> evaluation processes ensure your agency’s misconduct resistance<br />
approach remains relevant <strong>and</strong> effective in achieving stated objectives.<br />
Focus Questions<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
Is there a plan <strong>and</strong> mechanism in place for reviewing <strong>and</strong> assessing the effectiveness of your agency’s<br />
misconduct resistance strategies against key milestones, stated objectives <strong>and</strong> expected outcomes<br />
using st<strong>and</strong>ardised performance measures <strong>and</strong> indicators?<br />
Do review <strong>and</strong> evaluation processes make use of internal <strong>and</strong> external feedback, <strong>and</strong> information<br />
from misconduct complaints <strong>and</strong> investigations to improve business practices?<br />
Do your agency’s review <strong>and</strong> evaluation processes attempt to measure the extent to which your<br />
misconduct resistance approach has been integrated across different business activities?<br />
Has your agency assessed whether the individual components of the misconduct resistance approach<br />
(i.e. values, leadership, culture, treatment program, structures etc.) have increased or decreased the<br />
incidence of misconduct <strong>and</strong> its concealment?<br />
Has your agency assessed the impact of its misconduct resistance approach against general business<br />
efficiency <strong>and</strong> effectiveness indicators, such as numbers of complaints/customer satisfaction levels,<br />
staff turnover <strong>and</strong> morale, productivity figures, financial loss through theft <strong>and</strong> misuse of resources<br />
etc.?<br />
Have your agency’s misconduct resistance objectives been reviewed <strong>and</strong> confirmed or amended in<br />
light of organisational, environmental, business condition or government policy changes, including the<br />
results from updated risk assessments?<br />
Is business unit <strong>and</strong> corporate performance data consistently collected <strong>and</strong> analysed to inform the<br />
review <strong>and</strong> evaluation processes?<br />
Does your agency use benchmarking as a means of evaluating performance across work units <strong>and</strong><br />
against wider sector <strong>and</strong> industry norms?<br />
SignS of SucceSS<br />
Your agency has an established <strong>and</strong> appropriately resourced review <strong>and</strong> evaluation mechanism to<br />
assess whether misconduct resistance strategies are effective in achieving objectives. The review<br />
<strong>and</strong> evaluation mechanism also ensures that the strategies remain relevant <strong>and</strong> appropriate to your<br />
agency’s operations, <strong>and</strong> accommodate changes in the external operating environment.<br />
The review mechanism has specified timelines, incorporates both internal <strong>and</strong> external review<br />
processes, outlines key milestones <strong>and</strong> objectives to be achieved, <strong>and</strong> details the resources<br />
required.<br />
The results from review <strong>and</strong> evaluation processes are used to benchmark your agency’s performance<br />
(over time <strong>and</strong> across business units) <strong>and</strong> to support continual improvement in your agency’s<br />
misconduct resistance, business practices <strong>and</strong> service delivery, <strong>and</strong> general business efficiency <strong>and</strong><br />
effectiveness.<br />
20