Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...
Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...
Misconduct Resistance Framework - Corruption and Crime ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE RIGHT RISkS<br />
<strong>Misconduct</strong> risk identification <strong>and</strong> assessment are part of the wider corporate risk<br />
management planning process <strong>and</strong> include all of your agency’s functions <strong>and</strong><br />
operational areas.<br />
FOCuS QuESTIONS<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
w<br />
Does your agency underst<strong>and</strong> what misconduct is <strong>and</strong> what it might look like in your agency?<br />
Is your agency aware of all misconduct risks, including those which are unique to the core business<br />
of your agency, <strong>and</strong> those that are prevalent across the public sector?<br />
Have specific misconduct risks been linked to specific types of behaviours?<br />
Has your agency implemented a comprehensive risk identification process that involves<br />
consultation with all stakeholders, <strong>and</strong> identifies potential misconduct risks from internal <strong>and</strong><br />
external sources in all areas?<br />
Does your agency use the information obtained from misconduct <strong>and</strong> complaint reports <strong>and</strong> from<br />
reviews of systems <strong>and</strong> procedures to update its risk identification <strong>and</strong> assessment processes?<br />
Does your agency use a customised risk identification approach <strong>and</strong> language to identify<br />
misconduct risks within your particular agency?<br />
Does your agency underst<strong>and</strong> the impact of specific misconduct risks on business outcomes, <strong>and</strong><br />
can this impact be measured?<br />
Have your agency misconduct risks been evaluated against corporate risk criteria <strong>and</strong> prioritised<br />
for treatment as part of the corporate risk management plan?<br />
Does your agency use tailored criteria which reflect its business environment to ensure that the<br />
priority assessment is accurate in terms of the impact of misconduct risks on business outcomes<br />
(e.g. the dollar value may not be the best criterion for determining the damage caused by loss of<br />
public trust)?<br />
Is there a designated person, group or committee responsible for coordinating the assessment of<br />
misconduct risks <strong>and</strong> integrating it with corporate risk management planning processes?<br />
SignS of SuccESS<br />
Your agency has drawn on all stakeholder viewpoints to develop a comprehensive underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
of its misconduct risks, both those inherent to core business <strong>and</strong> those common across the<br />
sector. Your agency periodically reappraises its current misconduct risks <strong>and</strong> emerging threats in<br />
all work areas <strong>and</strong> across all operational <strong>and</strong> administrative functions.<br />
All identified risks are analysed, evaluated against your agency risk criteria <strong>and</strong> their impact on<br />
business outcomes quantified using relevant measures. You have included a prioritised list of<br />
misconduct risks requiring further treatment in the corporate risk management plan.<br />
Responsibility for the implementation <strong>and</strong> monitoring of misconduct risk assessment <strong>and</strong> planning<br />
processes has been allocated to a person or group who are also represented on the corporate<br />
risk management committee (or equivalent body).<br />
Your agency’s methodology for misconduct risk management meets recognised best practice<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> uses a customised process <strong>and</strong> language to address misconduct.<br />
10