30.06.2015 Views

Variance Application No - Upper Arlington

Variance Application No - Upper Arlington

Variance Application No - Upper Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Variance</strong> <strong>Application</strong> BZ-11-13<br />

Board of Zoning and Planning<br />

Monday, May 20, 2013<br />

I. Request/Code Requirements:<br />

This application requests approval of a garage room addition that encroaches 1’-1” into<br />

the ten-foot minimum east side yard setback and will encroach two feet into the side yard setback<br />

required where the length of the side wall exceeds 40 feet. Building permit #2013-00000690<br />

was submitted on April 15, 2013 and denied by Staff two days later for the above reasons. Plans<br />

were then resubmitted which removed the garage addition portion of the scope of work, and a<br />

permit was issued on May 7, 2013. Should this variance application be approved, plans would<br />

be re-submitted to include the proposed addition. Therefore, two variances have been requested.<br />

Article 5.02 of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires two-story<br />

homes in the R-1c (One-Family Residence District) to maintain a side yard setback of 12 feet<br />

and that the side yard setback increase two inches for each foot the side wall elevation length<br />

exceeds 40 feet. The side wall elevation length is 43’-8” along the east property line.<br />

Figure 1: Staff Photo of Front Elevation (L) and Figure 2: Property Map (R)<br />

II.<br />

Site Description/Proposal:<br />

The subject property, 1441 Kingsgate Road, is a rectangular-shaped lot found on the<br />

south side of the street, just east of Abbey Road. The R-1b, One-Family Residence District,<br />

zoned lot contains 94 feet of frontage with 130 feet of depth. The home was constructed in 1958<br />

and contains a front-loaded, attached garage on the west side of the property. It sits two feet<br />

behind the platted 40-foot building line and already has nonconforming side yard setbacks of<br />

nearly nine feet on the west side and 16’-1” on the east side.<br />

The applicants are proposing a 53.5-square foot garage addition on the west side of the<br />

property, a large sunroom and living room addition toward the center of the property, and a 120-<br />

square foot two bedroom/two bathroom addition on the east side of the property. A total of<br />

seven square feet of the garage addition encroaches into the side yard and side yard longwall<br />

setbacks. The one-story garage addition aligns with the existing garage, while the<br />

1


edroom/bathroom addition projects six feet out from the existing home, up to the ten-foot side<br />

yard setback. The garage addition encroaches 1’-1” into the side yard setback and two feet into<br />

the side yard longwall requirements (variance required). The additions contain siding to match<br />

the home with each elevation containing numerous windows. The garage addition measures ten<br />

feet tall, the sunroom at 16 feet tall and the bed/bath addition at 13 feet tall. An existing<br />

screened porch would be removed. Proposed building coverage is 23.1 percent, while proposed<br />

development coverage is 34.7 percent, both below permissible limits.<br />

Figure 3: Proposed west elevation of garage addition<br />

The application states that, “We believe this to be a somewhat unique situation due to the<br />

placement of the house relative to the setback line and therefore does not establish a special<br />

privilege.” “The required ten-foot side yard setback overlays the existing house, therefore any<br />

addition is unreasonably forced further inward as compared to homes where the setback is<br />

outside the house.” “We are a family of six and we do feel these improvements are necessary for<br />

our family, and are consistent with the kind of improvements and quality that <strong>Upper</strong> <strong>Arlington</strong> is<br />

known for.<br />

Figure 4: Proposed rear elevation of garage addition and sunroom<br />

III.<br />

Summary and Staff Recommendation:<br />

Staff reviewed the application, visited the site and is supportive of the requested<br />

variances. As part of this proposal, an existing screened porch will be removed and the existing<br />

2


garage will be expanded. The addition continues the existing plane of the garage at 8’-11 1/4”<br />

from the west side property line (Finding #6). Stepping in the addition to eliminate the variances<br />

would reduce the width of the garage addition to about ten, reducing its utility (Finding #7).<br />

Only seven square feet of encroachment is requested, and an existing four-foot tall wood fence<br />

helps soften some of that impact (Finding #3). The addition also uses different materials to help<br />

break up the west side elevation. For these reasons, Staff recommends that this application be<br />

approved as submitted.<br />

Attachments:<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>No</strong>. BZ-11-13<br />

:jam<br />

Figure 5: Bing ® aerial photo of the neighborhood<br />

Figure 6: Existing view along west elevation (L) and Figure 7: Existing rear elevation (R)<br />

3


Figure 8: View down the west side yard<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!