See full report - WCS Canada

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 8. Massive sulphide deposits (e.g., nickel/copper) used in the scenario. 87°W 86°W ! Webequie First Nation Kilometers 87°W 86°W 85°W 85°W 84°W 84°W 52°N 53°N 53°N Ring of Fire ! First Nation Communities Massive Sulphide Deposits for Future Mine Scenario Mining Claims in Study Area Study Area Eagle's Nest Multi-Metal Mine Project First Nation Reservations Protected Areas National Ecozones Boreal Shield Hudson Plains 0 25 50 Attawapiskat River Missisa Lake Manitoba Hudson Bay ONTARIO U.S.A. Victor Diamond Mine Quebec 22 Canadian Boreal Initiative | Wildlife Conservation Society <strong>Canada</strong>
! Figure 9. Forestry SFLs overlapping the study area. 90°W ! ! ! Kingfisher Lake First Nation 89°W Wapekeka First Nation ! ! Wawakapewin First Nation Wunnumin Lake ! Webequie Attawapiskat River First Nation ! First Nation ! ! 88°W Nibinamik First Nation 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W Attawapiskat First Nation 81°W 80°W 79°W ! Mishkeegogamang First Nation ! Neskantaga ! First Nation ! Eabametoong ! First Nation ! Aroland First Nation Marten Falls First Nation ! Kashechewan First Nation Fort Albany First Nation Moose Factory First Nation ! ! Moose Cree First Nation ! Constance Lake First Nation 49°N 50°N 51°N 52°N 53°N 49°N 50°N 51°N 52°N 53°N Manitoba ONTARIO U.S.A. Hudson Bay Quebec James Bay Albany River Moose River ! First Nation Communities Area of Undertaking (AOU) Study Area First Nation Reservations Protected Areas Sustainable Forest License (SFL) Big Pic Forest Gordon Cosens Forest Hearst Forest Kenogami Forest Nagagami Forest National Ecozones Boreal Shield Hudson Plains 0 50 100 Kilometers 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W A Fork in the Road: Future Development in Ontario’s Far North 23
Page 1: a fork in the Road Future developme
Page 4 and 5: About the Canadian Boreal Initiativ
Page 6 and 7: developments in the north. The simu
Page 8 and 9: viii Canadian Boreal Initiative | W
Page 10 and 11: These ecosystems also confer erosio
Page 12 and 13: 2. Study Area The pilot study area
Page 14 and 15: 3. Methods The project applied A La
Page 16 and 17: Table 1. Cover types used when para
Page 18 and 19: 3.2 Ecological Processes 3.2.1 Succ
Page 20 and 21: 3.3 Land Use 3.3.1 Hydroelectric Se
Page 22 and 23: ! Figure 3. Current, planned, and p
Page 24 and 25: 2,000 MW of hydropower potential in
Page 26 and 27: Figure 6. Kimberlite deposits used
Page 28 and 29: Figure 7. Chromite deposits used in
Page 32 and 33: Table 7. Simulated harvest levels w
Page 34 and 35: 39 http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/ Bus
Page 36 and 37: CD Long / The Wolverine Foundation
Page 38 and 39: 3.4.3 Moose The response of moose h
Page 40 and 41: Table 11. Scoring system when apply
Page 42 and 43: Figure 10. Response of anthropogeni
Page 44 and 45: Risk to herd viability approached t
Page 46 and 47: Figure 13. Simulated response of wo
Page 48 and 49: Figure 14. Response of moose densit
Page 50 and 51: Figure 16. Distribution of watershe
Page 52 and 53: expansion of forestry activity (Vor
Page 54 and 55: North and recommended that “trans
Page 56 and 57: Outcomes of the analysis demonstrat
Page 58 and 59: 6. Conclusion Many of these outcome
Page 60 and 61: References Abraham, K. F., L. M. Mc
Page 62 and 63: Golder Associates Ltd. 2011. Recove
Page 64 and 65: Rempel, R.S., P.C. Elkie, A.R. Rodg
Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1. Overview of ALCES® The
Page 68 and 69: Appendix 2. The Conservation Matrix
Page 70: Appendix 3. OMNR’s Cervid Managem

See full report - WCS Canada

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?