18.11.2012 Views

Symmetric Monoidal Categories for Operads - Index of

Symmetric Monoidal Categories for Operads - Index of

Symmetric Monoidal Categories for Operads - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Introduction<br />

study the homotopy invariance <strong>of</strong> the functor S(M) :E→Eassociated to a<br />

Σ∗-object M. We prove more globally that the bifunctor (M,X) ↦→ S(M,X)<br />

satisfies an analogue <strong>of</strong> the pushout-product axiom <strong>of</strong> tensor products in<br />

symmetric monoidal model categories.<br />

§12. The Homotopy <strong>of</strong> Algebras over <strong>Operads</strong><br />

To have a good homotopy theory <strong>for</strong> algebras over an operad P, wehave<br />

to make assumptions on the operad P. In general, it is only reasonable to<br />

assume that the unit morphism <strong>of</strong> the operad η : I → P defines a c<strong>of</strong>ibration<br />

in the underlying category <strong>of</strong> Σ∗-objects – we say that the operad P is Σ∗c<strong>of</strong>ibrant.<br />

In the differential graded context, this assumption implies that<br />

each component <strong>of</strong> the operad P(n) <strong>for</strong>ms a chain complex <strong>of</strong> projective Σnmodules.<br />

For certain good symmetric monoidal categories, we can simply<br />

assume that the unit morphism <strong>of</strong> the operad η : I → P defines a c<strong>of</strong>ibration<br />

in the base category C – we say that the operad P is C-c<strong>of</strong>ibrant. In the<br />

differential graded context, this assumption implies that the chain complex<br />

P(n) consists <strong>of</strong> projective k-modules, but we do not assume that P(n) <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

a chain complex <strong>of</strong> projective Σn-modules.<br />

The category <strong>of</strong> P-algebras PE inherits natural classes <strong>of</strong> weak-equivalences,<br />

c<strong>of</strong>ibrations, fibrations, which are defined by using the adjunction between<br />

PE and the underlying category E. But none <strong>of</strong> our assumptions, though<br />

reasonable, is sufficient to imply the full axioms <strong>of</strong> model categories: the lifting<br />

and c<strong>of</strong>ibration axioms hold in the category <strong>of</strong> P-algebras <strong>for</strong> morphisms with<br />

a c<strong>of</strong>ibrant domain only. In this situation, it is usual to say that P-algebras<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms a semi-model category.<br />

In fact, the structure <strong>of</strong> a semi-model category is sufficient to carry out<br />

every usual construction <strong>of</strong> homotopical algebra. For our purpose, we review<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> model structures by adjunction and the notion <strong>of</strong> a Quillen<br />

adjunction in the context <strong>of</strong> semi-model categories.<br />

We prove the existence <strong>of</strong> semi-model structures on the category <strong>of</strong> Palgebras<br />

PE <strong>for</strong> every symmetric monoidal model category E over the base<br />

category C when the operad P is Σ∗-c<strong>of</strong>ibrant. Since we prove that Σ∗-objects<br />

<strong>for</strong>m a symmetric monoidal model category over C, we can apply our result<br />

to obtain a semi-model structure on the category <strong>of</strong> P-algebras in Σ∗-objects,<br />

equivalently, on the category <strong>of</strong> left P-modules. Recall that a Σ∗-object is<br />

connected if M(0) = 0. We observe that the semi-model structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

category <strong>of</strong> P-algebras in connected Σ∗-objects is well defined as long as the<br />

operad P is C-c<strong>of</strong>ibrant.<br />

§13. The (Co)homology <strong>of</strong> Algebras over <strong>Operads</strong><br />

The category <strong>of</strong> algebras over an operad P has a natural cohomology theory<br />

H∗ P (A, E) defined as a derived functor from the functor <strong>of</strong> derivations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!