18.11.2012 Views

Symmetric Monoidal Categories for Operads - Index of

Symmetric Monoidal Categories for Operads - Index of

Symmetric Monoidal Categories for Operads - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1<br />

<strong>Symmetric</strong> <strong>Monoidal</strong> <strong>Categories</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Operads</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

The notion <strong>of</strong> a symmetric monoidal category is used to give a general<br />

background <strong>for</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> operads. Standard examples <strong>of</strong> symmetric<br />

monoidal categories include categories <strong>of</strong> modules over a commutative ring,<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> differential graded modules, various categories <strong>of</strong> coalgebras,<br />

the category <strong>of</strong> sets together with the cartesian product, the category <strong>of</strong> simplicial<br />

sets, and the category <strong>of</strong> topological spaces. Other possible examples<br />

include the modern categories <strong>of</strong> spectra used to model stable homotopy, but<br />

in applications operads come <strong>of</strong>ten from the category <strong>of</strong> topological spaces<br />

or simplicial sets and categories <strong>of</strong> spectra are not used as the base category<br />

in our sense (see next).<br />

The first purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapter is to survey definitions <strong>of</strong> symmetric<br />

monoidal categories.<br />

To set our constructions, we fix a base symmetric monoidal category, usually<br />

denoted by C, in which all small colimits, all small limits exist, and we<br />

assume that the tensor product <strong>of</strong> C preserves all colimits (see §1.1.1). In the<br />

sequel, operads are usually defined within this base category C. But, in our<br />

constructions, we use naturally algebras over operads in extensions <strong>of</strong> the base<br />

category to which the operad belongs. For this reason, we review definitions<br />

<strong>of</strong> symmetric monoidal categories to have an appropriate axiomatic background<br />

<strong>for</strong> our applications. The axiomatic structure, needed to generalize<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> an algebra over an operad, consists <strong>of</strong> a symmetric monoidal<br />

category over the base category C, an object under C in the 2-category <strong>of</strong><br />

symmetric monoidal categories (see §1.1.2).<br />

Definitions <strong>of</strong> symmetric monoidal categories are reviewed in §1.1 with this<br />

aim in mind. The structure <strong>of</strong> a symmetric monoidal category over the base<br />

category is made explicit in that section.<br />

In §1.2, we recall the definition and properties <strong>of</strong> particular colimits<br />

(namely, reflexive coequalizers and filtered colimits). We use repeatedly<br />

that these colimits are preserved by tensor powers in symmetric monoidal<br />

categories.<br />

B. Fresse, Modules over <strong>Operads</strong> and Functors, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1967, 21<br />

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89056-0 1, c○ Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!