health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Standard X-ray Diffraction Powder Patterns$

$Standard X-ray Diffraction Powder Patterns$

$Standard X-ray Diffraction$

I 1 I I 1 III 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 10 days 0,32 Mev 80 days 0,30 Mev 150 days 0.28 Mev 2 years 0,48 Mev . The average energy of potassium 40 according to Marineili, Brinkerhoff and Hine^ 10 © is 0.4< 40 Mev. We believe this to be the best approximation of the energy for mixed fission products among the available long-lived isotopes. 2. There are losses both in the collection process and in the sample processing. These are corrected for only by the overall factor of 1.6 relating mixed fission product p activity found in pot samples to that found in composite gummed film samples for the same periods. This factor of 1.6 was shown to be a good average value for New York City over a period of two years in 1954 and 1955, but does not necessarily apply to each individual sample. Welford© 11 © has shown the relative loss of several nuclides and has.found a factor of 1.85 for the year 1958. . ... 1 P 3. The general formula depends on the T * law which is not abso lutely applicable to each sample and each type of debris. On the average, however, for fallout remote from the test site, it is the best value presently available c (Later reports, such as NRDL-24? indicate an exponent of -1.2? which is not appreciably different^) 4. No allowance is made for fission product fractionation or for.in duced activities. The fractionation is probably less critical at considerable distances from the test site but radiochemical data .are not available for checking this point. Most of the induced activities are of relatively short half-life and are not counted .with the time lag inherent in the system. 5. The general formula does not allow for differences in geographic distribution of the debris, (For instance the 1958 USSR polar tests did not appear in the southern hemisphere). All samples are treated by the same formula. The effect of this can only be shown by comparing computed Sr^O values with the few data avail able for measured Sr90 deposition, 6. The general formula does not allow a time lag for the debris to reach different geographic areas. The inclusion of such a lag would .have made the computation impossibly complex. 7. The general formula does not allow for distribution of megaton debris between the stratosphere ; troposphere and local deposition. This could have been included but would have essentially doubled the computation. This was not considered worth while since the estimates of this distribution are of doubtful validity. - 8 -
I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I t . The .general formula does not allow for the cases when almost all -of the deUrls came ;£rom a single "burst , ,The individual daily results£ however^ have been reviewed* Where the. presence of fiallatit^ Iqaowii trajectories and supplementary data indicate that the fallout does result largely from a single "burst> corrections have "been made Individually * This^ ,of course^ results in de-» creasing the ^Sr^Q and gaimna dose values for these partictilar sanples d Since only markedly high values can "be -detected^ .the .process may, destroy .the relationship between stations so corrected and those n^t c0rrected 0 I .** 9 -
Page 1 and 2: HASL-93 health and safety laborator
Page 3 and 4: LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepar
Page 5 and 6: I I I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors
Page 7 and 8: I For many years, gummed film sampl
Page 9 and 10: t 81 others. These data were also r
Page 11 and 12: I 1 I f I 1 I I t I I 1 These data
Page 13: 1 I f i l I l l l I l l l t i t i .
Page 17 and 18: I_ to Justify a monthly summary* In
Page 19 and 20: 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I C
Page 21 and 22: I * TABLE 3 I Comparison of Pot Ana
Page 23 and 24: I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I
Page 25 and 26: I total p activity relation for rou
Page 27 and 28: TABLE 7 Comparison of Pot Analyses
Page 29 and 30: I Table 9 presents comparisons or s
Page 31 and 32: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 33 and 34: I 137 Since the dose calculation fo
Page 35 and 36: I TABLE 12 Comparison of Infinity G
Page 37 and 38: 1 1 11 1 stations having only gumme
Page 39 and 40: I I I I I to a 1-1/4" diameter plas
Page 41 and 42: MONTHLY DEPOSITION DAILY DEPOSITION
Page 43 and 44: SECTION II • MONTHLY SUMMARIES FO
Page 45 and 46: 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 t
Page 47 and 48: 1 I I 1 1 1 I I i i i i i i i i i i
Page 49 and 50: 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I
Page 51 and 52: 1 r> 1 1 1 111I 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 STA
Page 53 and 54: I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 • STATION
Page 55 and 56: 1 i1I i i i i i i i March April May
Page 57 and 58: 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 59 and 60: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 61 and 62: 1 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 July Aug
Page 63 and 64: 1 i Iii i i i i i i i i i i i i i S
Page 65 and 66:
' 1 111 1 i~k.f\ ESTIMATE OF Sr 1^
Page 67 and 68:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 69 and 70:
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 71 and 72:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jan. Fe
Page 73 and 74:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 75 and 76:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 77 and 78:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 79 and 80:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 81 and 82:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 83 and 84:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 85 and 86:
STATION # 141 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPO
Page 87 and 88:
STATION #204 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPOS
Page 89 and 90:
I ESTIMATE 1 1 i I 1 1 1 f I I I 1
Page 91 and 92:
I I 1 i i i t i i i i i i i I i i S
Page 93 and 94:
I I I i i i i i i * i i i i t t i i
Page 95 and 96:
1 1 1 I 1" 1 1 9 I t 1 1 1 1 Iw t 1
Page 97 and 98:
I I 1 I 1 i I 1 1 tI i STATION # Ja
Page 99 and 100:
1 1 I I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
Page 101 and 102:
1 1 I I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
Page 103 and 104:
May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.
Page 105 and 106:
1 111 1 ESTIMATE OF Sr^Q DEPOSITION
Page 107 and 108:
1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 109 and 110:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
Page 111 and 112:
ESTIMATE OF Sr^ DEPOSITION FROM GUM
Page 113 and 114:
1 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPOSITION FROM
Page 115 and 116:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I:^5
Page 117 and 118:
I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I
Page 119 and 120:
1 1 1111 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STA
Page 121 and 122:
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
Page 123 and 124:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
Page 125 and 126:
I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 135 and 136:
1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STATION # 50
Page 137 and 138:
1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
Page 145 and 146:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 147 and 148:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STATION # Jan. Feb.
Page 149 and 150:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1
Page 151 and 152:
1 1111 1 STATION # 516 ESTIMATE OF
Page 153 and 154:
1 1 1 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPOSITION F
Page 155 and 156:
1 1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
Page 157 and 158:
1 I I i I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1
Page 159 and 160:
. ESTIMATE OF 3r90 DEPOSITIONFBflfe
Page 161 and 162:
STATION # 523 ESTIMATE OF Sr^° DEP
Page 163 and 164:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 I 1 I^^ 1 STATION
Page 165 and 166:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 i i
Page 167 and 168:
1 ESTIMATE 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
Page 169 and 170:
1 ESTIMATE OF Sryu DEPOSITION FROM
Page 171 and 172:
1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 t
Page 173 and 174:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1«^
Page 175 and 176:
1 ESTIMATE 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Page 177 and 178:
1 1111111II11 1 11I 1 1 Jan. Feb. M
Page 179 and 180:
1 ESTIMATE 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1
Page 181 and 182:
1 11 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1
Page 183 and 184:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
Page 185 and 186:
1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 M
Page 187 and 188:
1 iiiiiiIi i i i i i i i i i Jan. F
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 193 and 194:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 195 and 196:
1 1111111111 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPOS
Page 197 and 198:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 199 and 200:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ESTIMATE OF Sr9
Page 201 and 202:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 203 and 204:
1 111111111111111 1 1 Nov. Dec. TOT
Page 205 and 206:
1 11111111111 1 111 1 1 Jan. Feb. M
Page 207 and 208:
1 111 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ja
Page 209 and 210:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 211 and 212:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 213 and 214:
1 1 1 1 1 STATION I Jail. Feb. Maro
Page 215 and 216:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 I• 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
Page 217 and 218:
I I I I 1 1 I I 1 a STATION # 722 J
Page 219 and 220:
I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I t I
Page 221 and 222:
I I t I 1 1 I I 1 i I i I i i i i i
Page 223 and 224:
I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1
Page 225 and 226:
I 1 1i i i t i ii i STATION # Jan,
Page 227 and 228:
1 I 1 i i i i i i i i i i t i i t t
Page 229 and 230:
I 1 1 STATION Jan, Feb. ESTIMATE OP
Page 231 and 232:
1 1 1 1 ESTIMATE OF Sr^ DEPOSITION
Page 233 and 234:
1 11 1 STB^TE'l aFSr90 DEPOSITIONJf
Page 235 and 236:
I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I
Page 237 and 238:
STATION # 7T2 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPO
Page 239 and 240:
i 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I
Page 241 and 242:
' I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I
Page 243 and 244:
I 1 111111f1I STATION # 801 FOTIMAT
Page 245 and 246:
I 1I111I11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jan. Feb.
Page 247 and 248:
1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1I 1 STATION # Jan,
Page 249 and 250:
1 11I11I1I111I1I111 STATION # 805 E
Page 251 and 252:
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
Page 253 and 254:
O • * • • • * » H H N) VO
Page 255 and 256:
i i iii i i i i i i i STATION # Jan
Page 257 and 258:
f*\ C*» CJ* CM vO CM H H O H H CM
Page 259 and 260:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 , ESTIMATE STA
Page 261 and 262:
Jan, Feb. March April May June July
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 271 and 272:
ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPOSITION FROM GU
Page 273 and 274:
1 111111 1 s. ESTIMATE OF (Sr^0 DEP
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
1 1 111111 I 1 1 I 1 I1 1 1 1 STATI
Page 279 and 280:
I I I II ESTIMATE OF Sr DEPOSITION
Page 281 and 282:
1 1 I11111I11 1 ESTIMATE OF pr*^ DE
Page 283 and 284:
I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I
Page 285 and 286:
I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 287 and 288:
I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 i i i i i i i i t i
Page 289 and 290:
I 1 I I I III 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I E
Page 291 and 292:
I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I
Page 293 and 294:
I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I
Page 295 and 296:
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I
Page 297 and 298:
I I I 1 1 I i i i i i i i i i i i i
Page 299 and 300:
1 1 1 1 ESTIMATE OF Sr90 DEPOSITION
Page 301 and 302:
1 1 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 303 and 304:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
Page 305 and 306:
I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I
Page 311 and 312:
1 ESTIMATE 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
1 ESTIMATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 STATION # Jan. Feb
Page 325 and 326:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
show all

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?