05.07.2015 Views

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

t<br />

81 others. These data were also reported "by Eiseribud <strong>and</strong> Harley.(4>5)<br />

I The network since 1954 has been quite stable. In January 1959 it<br />

A Nations.<br />

consisted of 46 U. S. stations, 68 elsewhere in North America <strong>and</strong> overseas<br />

<strong>and</strong> 64 maintained in cooperation with other countries through the United<br />

As the approach to fallout problems became more sophisticated, it was<br />

desirable to have a measure of individual radionuclides, particularly Sr^<br />

<strong>and</strong> to have an estimate of the gamma dose delivered to the population in<br />

M various geographic areas. Actual Sr^ measurements could best be performed<br />

m on monthly samples but, because of the radiochemistry involved, this col<br />

lection system grew very slowly. It was apparent that it would be very use<br />

s© ful if a reasonable estimate of the Sr^ deposition could be made from the<br />

total beta measurements on gummed film.<br />

JH ,In the period before megaton weapons were fired, the radioactive debris<br />

m stayed in the troposphere <strong>and</strong> was cleared out with an average life of about<br />

t<br />

one month. Thus, it was usually possible to attribute fallout to a single<br />

QD<br />

burst <strong>and</strong> to make reasonable estimates of the $r content based on total<br />

beta measurements. It was also possible by a knowledge of the nuclides pro-<br />

duced, to estimate the infinite plane gamma dose.<br />

M The original calculations of Sr^ deposition from measurements of<br />

total beta activity on ashed gummed-film samples>were performed as follows:<br />

^3 1. The activity measured on a given sampling day was attributed to<br />

the test immediately preceding that sampling day.<br />

2. The measured activity on the counting day was extrapolated to a<br />

fixed day^(usually the first day of the following year) by the<br />

formula<br />

I<br />

- 3 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!