05.07.2015 Views

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

health and safety laboratory - Digital Collections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

^valuation of Sr90 Data<br />

In estimating the validity of gummed film values for Sr90 , we have<br />

QO<br />

available radiochemical Sr7W measurements in monthly pot samples <strong>and</strong> in soil<br />

m samples* The earliest useful pot data began in April 1954 at New York City<br />

but even as late as January 1957, only a few stations were available* For<br />

the soil collections, a few locations were sampled in October of 1955 <strong>and</strong> a<br />

larger number in 1956 <strong>and</strong> 1958,<br />

Pot samples, like gummed film, are a measure of fallout rate 0 The<br />

m analyses are available on a monthly basis <strong>and</strong> no decay corrections are required.<br />

v» The comparison of calculated ,<strong>and</strong> .measured values must be made with a<br />

degree of caution <strong>and</strong> the pot values should not be automatically assumed as<br />

correct. In all of the comparative tables we have indicated where certain<br />

pot values are suspect* Suspicion is raised where other radiochemical data,<br />

£ such as Strontium-89/90 ratios indicate possible error in the Sr90 analysis.<br />

g It is also possible, .of course, that other pot samples may have suffered<br />

losses in the sample transfer without disturbing the 89/90 ratio* There is<br />

a.possible added factor in that many pot-gummed film comparisons are made<br />

for cases when the two collectors are separated by some distance even though<br />

£ in the same city,<br />

_ - Three sets of data are presented for New York City, Table 3 shows the<br />

pot data <strong>and</strong> the computed Sr^O values based on the original single burst<br />

^ 90<br />

assumption for several months in 1956* The computed Sr is obviously very<br />

low <strong>and</strong> the apparent age of the fallout is much greater than was assumed.<br />

I This disagreement was ^the reason for seeking a better model 0<br />

^ Table 4 couapares pot values with Sr^0 computed by the present model.<br />

i<br />

i<br />

Inspection of this table brings out several points:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!