09.07.2015 Views

Stabilization and Reconstruction Staffing - RAND Corporation

Stabilization and Reconstruction Staffing - RAND Corporation

Stabilization and Reconstruction Staffing - RAND Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 <strong>Stabilization</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reconstruction</strong> <strong>Staffing</strong>: Developing U.S. Civilian PersonnelAccording to the GAO, although the total number of CPA employeesfluctuated, the composition of personnel, on average, remained relativelyconstant: 9••••Approximately 28 percent of the staff members was militarypersonnel.Approximately 13 percent was from other coalition countries.Approximately 26 percent was civilians from numerous U.S. governmentagencies, including the Department of Defense.About 25 percent was contractors <strong>and</strong> temporary employees hiredunder Section 3161 of Title 5, United States Code (5 USC 3161).These statistics indicate that the U.S. government supplied justover half (26 percent from U.S. government agencies <strong>and</strong> 25 percentfrom temporary hires) of those actually deployed under its mode ofoperation for Iraq <strong>and</strong> used other sources to field the rest of its staff,including military manpower <strong>and</strong> contributions from allies <strong>and</strong> coalitionpartners. As a percentage of need, the number is actually far lower,considering that at its maximum the CPA was never staffed to its articulatedrequirement. 10To begin to underst<strong>and</strong> why the U.S. government did not recruitthe needed personnel requires a basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how federalgovernment personnel systems work. Government personnel systemsrespond to documented (i.e., a job description exists) <strong>and</strong> validated (i.e., aformal determination that the position is needed <strong>and</strong> properly defined)requirements placed on them by their parent agencies. Specifically, avalidated request that describes a position (e.g., skills required, grade9 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Rebuilding Iraq: Resource, Security, Governance,Essential Services, <strong>and</strong> Oversight Issues, Report to Congressional Committees, Washington,D.C.: GAO-04-902-R, June 2004.10 These requirements were often not validated, thus putting no dem<strong>and</strong> on the U.S. governmentpersonnel systems. GAO numbers do not add to 100 percent; the report provides noexplanation about the supplier of the residual 8 percent of personnel. Furthermore, as notedpreviously, estimates are that the CPA staff was never above 58 percent of requirements,indicating that the civilian personnel system never produced more than approximately 28percent of the required personnel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!