314 H. LAZARATOU et al PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 201032. Dellatolas G, Watier L, Giannopulu I, Chevrie-Muller C.Behavior difficulties, attention difficulties and learning problemsin children aged from 3.5 to 8 years: a longitudinalschool study. Arch Pediatr 2007, 14:227–23333. Rutter M, Caspi A, Fergusson D, Horwood, LJ, Goodman R,Maughan B et al. Sex differences in developmental readingdisability: new findings from 4 epidemiological studies. JAm Med Assoc 2004, 291:2007–201234. St Sauver JL, Katusic SK, Barbaresi WJ, Colligan RC,Jakobsen SJ. Boy/girl differences in risk for reading disability:potential clues? Am J Epidemiol 2001, 154:787–79435. Abicoff H, Jensen P, Arnold L.A, Hoza B, Hechman L,Pollack S et al. Observed classroom behavior of childrenwith ADHD: relationship to gender and comorbidity. JAbnorm Child Psychol 2002, 30:349–35936. Newcorn JH, Halperin JM, Jensen PS, Abicoff HB, ArnoldLA, Cantwell DP et al. Symptom profiles in children withADHD: effects of comorbidity and gender. J Am Acad ChildAdolesc Psychiatry 2001, 40:137–14637. Biederman J, Mick E, Faraone SV, Braaten E, Doyle A,Spencer T et al. Influence of gender on attention deficithyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatricclinic. Am J Psychiatry 2002, 159:36–4238. Biederman J, Kwon A, Aleardi M, Chouinard VA, Marino T,Cole H et al. Absence of gender effects on attention deficithyperactivity disorder: finding in no referred subjects. AmJ Psychiatry 2005, 162:1083–108939. Rucklidge JJ, Tannock R. Neuropsychological profiles ofadolescents with ADHD: effects of reading difficulties andgender. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002, 43:988–100340. Goyette CH, Conners CK, Ulrich R. Normative data onrevised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. JAbnorm Child Psychol 1978, 6:221–23641. Werry JS, Sprague RL, Cohen MN. Conners’ Teacher RatingScale for use in drug studies with children – an empiricalstudy. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1975, 3:217–22942. Roussos A, Richardson C, Koumoula A, Kyprianos S,Lazaratou H, Marketos S et al. The Conners-28 teacherquestionnaire in clinical and nonclinical samples of Greekchildren 6–12 years old. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999b,8:260–26743. Giannopulu I, Escolano S, Cusin F, Citeau H, Dellatolas G.Teacher’s reporting of behavioural problems and cognitiveacademicperformances in children aged 5–7 years. Br JEduc Psychol 2008, 78:127–14744. McGee R, Prior M, Williams S, Smart D Sanson A. The longtermsignificance of teacher-rated hyperactivity and readingability in childhood: findings from two longitudinal studies.J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002, 43:1004–101745. Sabbagh SE, Soria C, Escolano S, Bulteau C, DellatolasG. Impact of epilepsy characteristics and behavioral problemson school placement in children. Epil Behav 2006,9:573–57846. Martinussen R, Hayden J, Hogg-Johnson S, Tannock, R. Ameta-analysis of working memory impairments in childrenwith attention – deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am AcadChild Adolesc Psychiatry 2005, 44:377–38447. Martinussen R, Tannock R. Working memory impairmentsin children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder withand without comorbid language learning disorders. J ClinExperim Neuropsychol 2006, 28:1073–109448. Brock S, Knapp P. Reading comprehension abilities of childrenwith attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J AttentDisord 1996, 1:173–18649. Ghelani K, Sidhu R, Jain U, Tannock R. Reading comprehensionand reading related abilities in adolescents withreading disabilities and Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity disorder.Dyslexia 2004, 10:364–38450. Aaron PG, Joshi RM, Palmer H, Smith N, Kirby E. Separatinggenuine cases of reading disability from reading deficitscaused by predominantly inattentive ADHD behavior. JLearn Disabil 2002, 35:425–435,47751. Pennington BF, Groisser D, Welsh MC. Contrasting cognitivedeficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder vs readingdisability. Development Psychol 1993, 29:511–52352. Du Paul GT, Stoner G. ADHD in the schools: Assessmentand intervention strategies. New York, Guilford Press,199453. Collett BR, Ohan JL, Myers KM. Ten-year review of ratingscales. V: scales assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivitydisorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003,42:1015–103754. Worley KA, Wolraich ML, Lambert WE, Bickman L (2001).Addressing the multiple informant aspect of the DSM IVin diagnosing ADHD. J Development Behav Pediatr 2001,22:347–33455. Mitsis EM, McKay KE, Schulz KP, Newcorn JH, HalperinJM. Parent-teacher concordance for DSM VI attention/deficithyperactivity disorder in a clinic referred sample J AmAcad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000, 39:308–31356. Wender E. ADHD symptoms and parent-teacher agreement.J Development Behav Pediatr 2004, 25:48–4957. Tripp G, Schaughency EA, Clarke, B. Parent and teacherrating scales in the evaluation of attention–deficit hyperactivitydisorder: contribution to diagnosis and differentialdiagnosis in clinically referred children. J DevelopmentBehav Pediatr 2006, 27:209–218Corresponding author: H. Lazaratou, Child Psychiatrist, Professor,Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Unit, Community Mental HealthCenter, 1st Psychiatric Department, Medical School, University ofAthens, Athens, Greecee-mail: elazar@med.uoa.gr
PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 315ReviewΑνασκόπησηCognitive theories of addiction:Α narrative reviewC. KouimtsidisSection of Alcohol Research, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UKPsychiatriki 2010, 21:315–323Several theories have been developed in order to understand the phenomenon of addiction.From a science development perspective, it is important to examine theories withshared concepts within a common framework, generate and test new hypotheses. Thispaper reviews those theories and models that consider substance misuse as a decisionmaking process involving conscious and unconscious cognitive processes including simple classicalconditioning models, cue reactivity, expectancy theory, social learning theory, neuropsychologicalmodels and the new hierarchical PRIME theory. A synthetic approach has been used as to identifysimilarities and to promote the incremental value of the discussed theories.Key words: addiction, theories, cognitions, behaviourIntroductionAddiction is a socially defined concept and refers toa syndrome, the centre of which is impaired controlover a reward-seeking behaviour; impaired controlthat is leading to significant harm. West (2006) 1 suggeststhat the definition should refer to a reward-seekingbehaviour that has become out of control, whichdescribes better the observed increase over time indrive to engage in the addictive behaviour. Addictionis a broad concept that includes any behaviour satisfyingthe above mentioned three criteria. One ofsuch reward seeking behaviours is substance abuse.Substance abuse per se does not equal addiction unlessthere is loss of control and associated harm.Over the years several theories aimed at understandingand explaining the above mentioned threecomponents of the definition of substance abuse asan addiction. Most theories explore the phenomenonfrom a generic point of view and they focus onthe behaviour involved rather than the specific substanceused. The concepts of "theory" and "model"are usually used interchangeably. There is though amajor difference between the two: A model is a representationof a system or an object or set of events.
- Page 5: PSYCHIATRIKIQuarterly journal publi
- Page 9 and 10: PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 277Άρθ
- Page 11 and 12: PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 279Resear
- Page 13 and 14: PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 HOSPITAL
- Page 15 and 16: PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 HOSPITAL
- Page 17 and 18: PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 HOSPITAL
- Page 19 and 20: PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010 287Resear
- Page 22 and 23: 290 P. TZOURAMANIS et al PSYCHIATRI
- Page 24 and 25: 292 P. TZOURAMANIS et al PSYCHIATRI
- Page 26 and 27: 294 PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010Resear
- Page 28 and 29: 296 M. VLASSOPOULOS et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 30 and 31: 298 M. VLASSOPOULOS et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 32 and 33: 300 M. VLASSOPOULOS et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 34 and 35: 302 M. VLASSOPOULOS et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 36 and 37: 304 PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010Resear
- Page 38 and 39: 306 H. LAZARATOU et al PSYCHIATRIKI
- Page 40 and 41: 308 H. LAZARATOU et al PSYCHIATRIKI
- Page 42 and 43: 310 H. LAZARATOU et al PSYCHIATRIKI
- Page 44 and 45: 312 H. LAZARATOU et al PSYCHIATRIKI
- Page 48 and 49: 316 C. Kouimtsidis PSYCHIATRIKI 21
- Page 50 and 51: 318 C. Kouimtsidis PSYCHIATRIKI 21
- Page 52 and 53: 320 C. Kouimtsidis PSYCHIATRIKI 21
- Page 54 and 55: 322 C. Kouimtsidis PSYCHIATRIKI 21
- Page 56 and 57: 324 PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010Specia
- Page 58 and 59: 326 B.J. HAVAKI-KONTAXAKI et al PSY
- Page 60 and 61: 328 B.J. HAVAKI-KONTAXAKI et al PSY
- Page 62 and 63: 330 B.J. HAVAKI-KONTAXAKI et al PSY
- Page 64 and 65: 332 PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010Genera
- Page 66 and 67: 334 C.I. Istokoglou et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 68 and 69: 336 C.I. Istokoglou et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 70 and 71: 338 C.I. Istokoglou et al PSYCHIATR
- Page 72 and 73: 340 PSYCHIATRIKI 21 (4), 2010• 10
- Page 74 and 75: SUBMISSIONPapers either in English
- Page 76 and 77: ΥΠΟΒΟΛΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΩΝΟι
- Page 78: ΣΥΝΟΔΕΥΤΙΚΟ ΕΝΤΥΠΟ