- Page 1 and 2: BIOMECHANICAL PERFORMANCE FACTORS O
- Page 3 and 4: AcknowledgmentsI would like to star
- Page 5: 6.1 Conclusion and Future Considera
- Page 9 and 10: Appendix AFigure 1: Calibration cur
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1: Introduction and Backgro
- Page 13: lightweight, tight fitting and havi
- Page 16 and 17: 1.2 CoachingThe Coaching Associatio
- Page 18 and 19: 2007b]. They can be implemented to
- Page 20 and 21: those that were not completed on th
- Page 22 and 23: The final chapter will provide an o
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1 Literature ReviewSports technol
- Page 26 and 27: One of the major advancements in at
- Page 28 and 29: measurement system and GPS can be u
- Page 30 and 31: Brodie et al’s (2008) instrumenta
- Page 32 and 33: published. However, it has been sug
- Page 34 and 35: Methods and Instrumentation used fo
- Page 36 and 37: 1 Introduction and BackgroundSlalom
- Page 38 and 39: (IMUs) has allowed for the implemen
- Page 40 and 41: 2 MethodsThe natural environment su
- Page 42 and 43: The ski based IMU and transceiver s
- Page 44 and 45: Wheatstone bridge on a piece of alu
- Page 46 and 47: was not practical and the number of
- Page 48 and 49: have almost fallen but recovered an
- Page 50 and 51: and acceleration peaks represent th
- Page 52 and 53: 8%) and the intermittent loss was a
- Page 54 and 55: 4 DiscussionDuring the experimental
- Page 56 and 57:
Nyquist theorem applies under the a
- Page 58 and 59:
study. Most significantly the skier
- Page 60 and 61:
Water Skiing Biomechanics a Study o
- Page 62 and 63:
1 Introduction and BackgroundWater
- Page 64 and 65:
There is a lack of quantitative exp
- Page 66 and 67:
Table 2: Summary of ski models used
- Page 68 and 69:
Vermont). An observational recordin
- Page 70 and 71:
average result for the subjects on
- Page 72 and 73:
SUECSTBTA400080350060Rope Load (N)3
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure 5 shows the total average ma
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure 7 shows the overall average
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 9 shows each ski’s overall
- Page 80 and 81:
Success rate results in Table 3 sho
- Page 82 and 83:
technique for slalom deep water sta
- Page 84 and 85:
would provide insight into the diff
- Page 86 and 87:
provide the same structure to their
- Page 88 and 89:
design concepts. Data of this natur
- Page 90 and 91:
Biomechanical Analysis of Slalom Wa
- Page 92 and 93:
1 IntroductionWater skiing requires
- Page 94 and 95:
An inertial measurement unit (IMU)
- Page 96 and 97:
course consists of a set-up cut, en
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 2: Summary of the four ski mo
- Page 100 and 101:
was minimal since whenever possible
- Page 102 and 103:
Ski Roll, Ski Acceleration, SkierVe
- Page 104 and 105:
the integral results represent uppe
- Page 106 and 107:
epresent the calculated pooled stan
- Page 108 and 109:
0Dom Non-DomIntegral of Deceleratio
- Page 110 and 111:
Figure 11 shows the overall average
- Page 112 and 113:
Figure 13 and Figure 14 show each s
- Page 114 and 115:
Figure 15 and Figure 16 show the ov
- Page 116 and 117:
Typical data profiles shown in Figu
- Page 118 and 119:
oll in the calculated integral. For
- Page 120 and 121:
The only parameter that had no sign
- Page 122 and 123:
analysis was only able to identify
- Page 124 and 125:
6.1 Conclusion and Future Considera
- Page 126 and 127:
References116
- Page 128 and 129:
Park, H.M. (2008b) Univariate Analy
- Page 130 and 131:
Appendix A: Sample calibration proc
- Page 132 and 133:
Appendix B: Sample qualitative surv
- Page 134 and 135:
1 2 3 4 More than 415. On average h
- Page 136 and 137:
Ski 3PoorScaleGoodExcellentSki 4Poo