19.11.2012 Views

2011 Environmental Statement 1.8 MB - Sappi

2011 Environmental Statement 1.8 MB - Sappi

2011 Environmental Statement 1.8 MB - Sappi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Material efficiency is based on the relation of<br />

produced paper (net saleable paper, NSP) to<br />

production loss. Production loss is the<br />

amount of purification sludge (external) and<br />

paper produced but disposed of (rejected<br />

product, unsuited for internal re-use). To facilitate<br />

objective comparisons, the bulk streams<br />

are first converted to 100% adro (100% dry<br />

substance share).<br />

Below is an overview of material efficiency,<br />

one of the key indicators in the EMAS III provisions,<br />

for paper production at <strong>Sappi</strong> Nijmegen<br />

BV.<br />

3.5 Soil<br />

3.5.1 Soil preservation<br />

The presence of certain potential sources for<br />

soil pollution within <strong>Sappi</strong> Nijmegen B.V. is<br />

inherently linked to the production process.<br />

On locations where this is the case, floors<br />

have been protected with liquid-proof layers,<br />

resistant to the chemicals used in the mill.<br />

This applies to:<br />

• work place floors<br />

• floors in storage areas for chemicals and<br />

oils<br />

• floor of the boiler house<br />

Target (related to disposal)<br />

No soil emissions<br />

All storage locations within <strong>Sappi</strong> Nijmegen<br />

B.V. have been equipped with adequate pro-<br />

Net Paper production Sales (NPS)<br />

95 % adro, in tons<br />

Purification sludge<br />

45 % adro, in tons<br />

Dirty white<br />

95 % adro, in tons<br />

Material efficiency (key indicator)<br />

Relation: NSP (purification sludge<br />

+ dirty white)<br />

28 <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Material efficiency<br />

visions to minimize the chance of soil pollution.<br />

This has been assessed in compiling the<br />

BRD (BodemRisicoDocument – Soil Risk Document),<br />

according to the NRB methodology.<br />

All measures proposed in this document have<br />

been implemented. In 2006, the document<br />

has been updated and new measures have<br />

been planned and implemented based on the<br />

new findings.<br />

3.5.2 Soil sanitation<br />

Target (related to disposal)<br />

Prevention of further spreading of present<br />

pollution<br />

Current status<br />

In the context of BSB, an exploratory investigation<br />

was conducted on the premises of<br />

<strong>Sappi</strong> Nijmegen BV in 1996, followed up by<br />

additional studies on specific locations. External<br />

consultants then suggested recommendations<br />

in a monitoring plan, which has<br />

been approved by BSB. The plan lists locations<br />

eligible for monitoring, also indicating<br />

frequency and phasing. The monitoring plan<br />

has been carried out by <strong>Sappi</strong> Nijmegen BV<br />

until January 1, 2008, when BSB Gelderland<br />

suspended its activities and the file was taken<br />

over by the City of Nijmegen.<br />

In consultation with the City of Nijmegen, a<br />

start has been made to update the previous<br />

soil surveys, to be followed by risk assessment<br />

as to severity and urgency of the existing<br />

situation. In 2008, the authorities in<br />

1985 2009 2010 <strong>2011</strong><br />

100% adro 100% adro 100% adro 100% adro<br />

120,600 114,570 197,184 187,325 217,923 207,027 194,633 184,901<br />

13,600 6,120 4,168 1,876 4,327 1,947 5,056 2,275<br />

97 92 219 208 326 310 279 265<br />

94.6 % 98.9 98.9 98.6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!