ICCS 2009 Technical Report - IEA

Table B.29.1: Allocation of student sample in NorwaySchool Participation Status—Student SurveyParticipating SchoolsExplicit Strata Total IneligibleNon-ParticipatingSampled Schools Schools Sampled First Second Schoolsreplacement replacementBokmål 127 0 79 26 6 16Nynorsk 23 0 16 1 1 5Total 150 0 95 27 7 21Table B.29.2: Allocation of teacher sample in NorwaySchool Participation Status—Teacher SurveyParticipating SchoolsExplicit Strata Total IneligibleNon-ParticipatingSampled Schools Schools Sampled First Second Schoolsreplacement replacementBokmål 127 0 44 15 3 65Nynorsk 23 0 9 1 1 12Total 150 0 53 16 4 77Note: 32 schools were regarded as non-participating because the within-school participation rate was below 50%.B.30. Paraguay• Very small schools (fewer than nine students in the target grade) and schools in thedepartments of Boquerón and Alto Paraguay were excluded at the school level.• Explicit stratification was performed by urbanization (urban, rural) and sector (public,private, op (subsidized)), resulting in six explicit strata.• No implicit stratification was applied.Table B.30.1: Allocation of student sample in ParaguaySchool Participation Status—Student SurveyParticipating SchoolsExplicit Strata Total IneligibleNon-ParticipatingSampled Schools Schools Sampled First Second Schoolsreplacement replacementUrban—public 71 0 69 2 0 0Urban—private 9 0 9 0 0 0Urban—op (subsidized) 15 0 15 0 0 0Rural—public 51 0 43 7 0 1Rural—private 2 0 2 0 0 0Rural—op (subsidized) 2 0 2 0 0 0Total 150 0 140 9 0 1306 ICCS 2009 technical report