Volume 2, ISSUE2/2011 - Review of Applied Socio-Economic ...

Pag׀ 120 ISSN: 2247-6172ISSN-L: 2247-6172Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research(Issue 2/ 2011)URL: http://www.reaser.eue-mail: editors@reaser.eu[12] Kitschelt, Herbert. (2001). Accounting for Post-Communist Regime Diversity. What Counts as a Good Cause? InRadoslaw Markowski and Edmund Wnuk-Lipinski (Eds). Transformative Paths in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 49-86).Warsaw: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.[13] Lugosi, Nicole V.T. (2011). “Truth-telling” and Legal Discourse: A Critical Analysis of the Neil Stonechild Inquiry. CanadianJournal of Political Science, 44: 299-315 doi:10.1017/S0008423911000187[14] Porter, Anna. (2010). The Ghosts of Europe: Journies Through Central Europe’s Troubled Pat and Uncertain Future.Vancouver/Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre Publishers Inc.[15] Ramit, Sabrina Petra. (1994). The reemergence of Slovakia. Nationalities Papers, 22(1): 99-117.[16] Reisch, Alfred. Hungarian Foreign Policy and the Magyar Minorities: New Foreign Policy Priorities. NationalitiesPapers, 24(3): 447-466.[17] Rothschild, Joseph and Nancy M. Wingfield. (2008). Return to Diversity. 4 ed. New York: Oxford University Press.[18] Snyder, Timothy. (2010). Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. New York: Basic Books.[19] Szépe, György. The Position of Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia. Nationalities Papers, 27(1): 69-92.[20] Tóth, Pál Péter. (1996). Hungarians in the Successor States: From World War I to World War II. Nationalities Papers,24(3): 425-436.[21] Wolczuk, Kataryna. (2007). Constitutional Politics. In Stephen White, Judy Batt and Paul G. Lewis (Eds.)Developments in Central and East European Politics 4 (pp. 229-244). Durham: Duke University Press.