10.07.2015 Views

Sisal Annual Report 2011 - Permira

Sisal Annual Report 2011 - Permira

Sisal Annual Report 2011 - Permira

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The excellent level of operating profitability and constant attention to workingcapital cash flows enabled the Group to generate a strong operating cash flow in<strong>2011</strong>, so that it was able not only to meet its financial debt servicing obligations(scheduled repayments of principal included) but also, and above all, to financethe sizeable programme of investments and acquisitions, worth more than EUR 75million, which was carried out during the year.Consequently, the overall financial debt fell slightly, by about 0.8%, and, as inprior years, the Group complied with the financial covenants provided for in theaforementioned loan agreement in each of the four quarterly monitoring periods.The following are the main developments as regards gaming concessions.Concession for the operation and development of national totalisatornumber games (NTNG)• On April 2, 2008, <strong>Sisal</strong> S.p.A. was declared outright winner of the tender procedureheld in July 2007 for the award of the concession for the operationand development of national totalisator number games, including Enalotto,being chosen in preference to the bids submitted by Lottomatica S.p.A andSnai S.p.A.• On June 26, 2009, after a process lasting approximately two years and thefavourable outcome of the verification processes conducted by the State MonopoliesBoard (AAMS), relating in particular to <strong>Sisal</strong>’s bid, an agreement governingthe concession was entered into between AAMS and <strong>Sisal</strong>.• On the legal front, <strong>Sisal</strong> S.p.A. had to contend with appeals to the administrativetribunal filed by the other two companies participating in the selectionprocedure (namely Snai S.p.A. and Lottomatica S.p.A.) and by other companies(including Stanley International Betting Limited), mainly with a view to gainingaccess to all the documentation and having the provisional and final concessionawards overturned. They include the appeals filed by Snai S.p.A., whichcomplained that the specific points contained in its proposals had not beensufficiently taken into consideration compared with the evaluation of the samepoints described in <strong>Sisal</strong>’s proposals, and by Lottomatica S.p.A., objecting tothe failure of the Examining Commission to carry out the verification procedureon an ‘anomalous’ bid. With specific reference to this latter appeal, on March25, 2009, AAMS announced its decision to instruct the Examining Commissionto carry out a preliminary investigation to verify the suitability of the bidsubmitted by the company. The verification by the Examining Commission wascompleted on May 18, 2009, and established that the technical and economicbid submitted by <strong>Sisal</strong> was suitable and reliable, thus effectively removing thesubstance of the appeal made to the Regional Administrative Tribunal (TAR) byLottomatica S.p.A. against the outcome of the selection procedure.24 <strong>Sisal</strong> ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!