Learning Management Systems in Higher Education ... - CTools

More documents

Recommendations

Info

General Trends• No differences for <strong>in</strong>structors between campuses• Residential students rate most Learner-ContentLMS activities higher than commuter students.• Commuter students rate some Learner-Instructorand nearly all Learner-Learner LMS activitieshigher than residential students.Tuesday, November 9, 2010SI & USE LabUniversity of Michigan
User Log DifferencesBetween Campuses• 1,565 residential campus LMS sites287 commuter campus LMS sites• Aggregated all events by tool for coursesites <strong>in</strong> which student respondents wereenrolled.• Categorized tools by LC, LI, LL• Differences of average percentage ofuse across LMS sites by campus.Tuesday, November 9, 2010SI & USE LabUniversity of Michigan
Page 1 and 2: Learning Management Systemsin Highe
Page 3 and 4: USE LabResearch Team• Steven Lonn
Page 5 and 6: LMS GrowthSI & USE LabUniversity of
Page 7 and 8: Different Types ofInteractions• D
Page 9 and 10: Survey Items by Interaction TypeTue
Page 11 and 12: Survey Items by Interaction Type•
Page 13 and 14: Multi-InstitutionalResearch Questio
Page 15 and 16: Findings• Learner-Content (LC)•
Page 17: Residential vs.Commuter• Instruct
Page 21 and 22: Summary• No significant differenc
Page 23 and 24: How Does LMS AffectUse of In-Class
Page 25 and 26: Learner-Content(LC) InteractionsStu
Page 27 and 28: Other InteractionsStudents• "Many
Page 29: Negative Responses• Students main
Page 32 and 33: Qualitative Analysis Summary• Fac
Page 34 and 35: Examples of LMS Use• Principles o
Page 36 and 37: LectureTools• Hybrid for LC, LI,
Page 38 and 39: Conclusions• Across campuses, LMS
Page 40 and 41: Future LearningSpaces with LMS• A

Learning Management Systems in Higher Education ... - CTools

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?